Advertisement

Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 151, Issue 4, pp 827–831 | Cite as

Sexual dimorphism of egg size in the European Blackbird Turdus merula

  • Rafał MartykaEmail author
  • Joanna Rutkowska
  • Anna Dybek-Karpiuk
  • Mariusz Cichoń
  • Kazimierz Walasz
Original article

Abstract

Recently, a number of studies have shown that female birds are able to control the sex of their progeny at the stage of the gamete. There is also some evidence that females adjust their investment in offspring depending on the sex of the embryo during egg formation. Differential maternal investment to the eggs depending on their sex is usually interpreted as an adaptive strategy, by which females can increase competitive abilities of the smaller sex, or preferentially invest towards the sex with the potentially higher fitness returns. Here, we studied variation in egg size in relation to embryo sex and laying order in the European Blackbird Turdus merula. We found male and female eggs to differ in size, with larger eggs containing male embryos, as well as a significant interaction between embryo sex and laying order. This interaction resulted from the fact that egg size increased with the laying sequence among eggs bearing females but did not change with laying order among eggs bearing males. There was no relationship between offspring sex and the laying sequence within a clutch. We suggest that sexual dimorphism in egg size recorded in the European Blackbird may reflect favouritism of the sex which may give higher fitness returns.

Keywords

Egg volume Hatching asynchrony Laying sequence Maternal effects Sex allocation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Verhulst, D. Acevedo Seaman and anonymous reviewers for comments. This research was founded by Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education in years 2003–2006, partly by DS/WBiNoZ/INoŚ/757/06 and EC Center of Excellence IBAES. J. Rutkowska is supported by The Foundation for Polish Science. This study was conducted in agreement with the current laws of Poland.

References

  1. Anderson DJ, Reeve J, Bird DM (1997) Sexually dimorphic eggs, nestling growth and sibling competition in American kestrels Falco sparverius. Funct Ecol 11:331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold KE, Griffiths R (2003) Sex-specific hatching order, growth rates and fledging success in jackdaws Corvus monedula. J Avian Biol 34:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanco G, Martínez-Padilla J, Serrano D, Dávila JA, Vińuela J (2003) Mass provisioning to different-sex eggs within the laying sequence: consequences for adjustment of reproductive effort in a sexually dimorphic bird. J Anim Ecol 72:831–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cichoń M, Dubiec A, Stoczko M (2003) Laying order and offspring sex in blue tits Parus caeruleus. J Avian Biol 34:355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark AB, Wilson DS (1981) Avian breeding adaptations: hatching asynchrony, brood reduction and nest failure. Q Rev Biol 56:253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1984) Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature 308:358–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1986) Great expectations: dominance, breeding success and offspring sex ratios in red deer. Anim Behav 34:460–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cordero PJ, Griffiths SC, Aparicio JM, Parkin DT (2000) Sexual dimorphism in house sparrow eggs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cordero PJ, Vinuela J, Aparicio JM, Veiga JP (2001) Seasonal variation in sex ratio and sexual egg dimorphism favouring daughters in first clutches of the spotless starling. J Evol Biol 14:829–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cramp S (1988) Birds of the western Palearctic, vol 5. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Creighton E (2000) Reproductive strategies in the European Blackbird, Turdus merula. PhD thesis, The Open UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham EJA, Russell AF (2001) Reply to Petrie et al. Nature 412:498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffith SC, Owens IP, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoyt DF (1979) Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs. Auk 96:73–77Google Scholar
  17. Leitner S, Marshall RC, Leisler B, Catchpole CK (2006) Male song quality, egg size and offspring sex in captive canaries (Serinus canaria). Ethology 112:554–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lezalova R, Tkadlec E, Obornik M, Simek J, Honza M (2005) Should males come first? The relationship between offspring hatching order and sex in the black-headed gull Larus ridibundus. J Avian Biol 36:478–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Magrath RD (1989) Hatching asynchrony and reproductive success in the blackbird. Nature 339:536–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Magrath MJL, Brouwer L, Komdeur J (2003) Egg size and laying order in relation to offspring sex in the extreme sexually size dimorphic brown songlark, Cinclorhamphus cruralis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mead PS, Morton ML, Fish BE (1987) Sexual dimorphism in egg size and implications regarding facultative manipulation of sex in mountain white-crowned sparrows. Condor 89:798–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Müller W, Groothuis TGG, Eising CM, Daan S, Dijkstra C (2005) Within clutch co-variation of egg mass and sex in the black-headed gull. J Evol Biol 18:661–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Petrie M, Schwabl H, Brande-Lavridsen N, Burke T (2001) Sex differences in avian yolk hormone levels. Nature 412:498–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rutkowska J, Cichoń M (2005) Egg size, offspring sex and hatching asynchrony in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata. J Avian Biol 36:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheldon BC, West SA (2004) Maternal dominance, maternal condition, and maternal offspring sex ratio in ungulate mammals. Am Nat 163:40–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 170:90–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wysocki D (2002) Biometrical analysis of an urban population of the blackbird (Turdus merula) in Szczecin in Poland. Ring 24(2):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Young RL, Badyaev AV (2004) Evolution of sex-biased maternal effects in birds: I. Sex-specific resource allocation among simultaneously growing oocytes. J Evol Biol 17:1355–1366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafał Martyka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joanna Rutkowska
    • 1
  • Anna Dybek-Karpiuk
    • 1
  • Mariusz Cichoń
    • 1
  • Kazimierz Walasz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Environmental SciencesJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations