Advertisement

Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 151, Issue 2, pp 309–315 | Cite as

What are we dealing with? An explicit test reveals different levels of taxonomical diagnosability in the Sylvia cantillans species complex

  • Mattia Brambilla
  • Severino Vitulano
  • Andrea Ferri
  • Fernando Spina
  • Elena Fabbri
  • Ettore Randi
Original Article

Abstract

Diagnosability is the ability to discriminate between similar taxa, including sibling or cryptic taxa. We have developed an explicit test of diagnosability, using the Sylvia cantillans species complex as a model, which compares an identification based on phenotype with that based on genotype. Individual warblers sampled during their migration in central Italy were first identified to the (sub)species level using putatively diagnostic plumage traits. Nucleotide sequences of a (598-bp) fragment of the mitochondrial (mt)DNA cytochrome b were then used to assign each individual to distinct phylogenetic clades, as determined by reference haplotypes that had been sequenced in breeding individuals. This resulted in the construction of clearly distinct clades corresponding to known taxa of the complex. The new haplotypes were assigned to one of the previously identified groups (corresponding to three different taxa); no sample was assigned outside of them. In contrast, when plumage traits were used to assign the birds into distinct phylogenetic clades, 11 of 58 birds were classified as ‘uncertain/intermediate’ among two taxa, while five were classified differently with the two methods. A perfect agreement between the two methods was found for only for one taxon (Sylvia subalpina, syn. S. moltonii). For the other two taxa of the complex, diagnosability is therefore not guaranteed, and their field identification by hand should be carefully addressed. We provide here an example of an explicit test for establishing the diagnosability of taxa in which two or more ‘markers’ can be used for determining discordant identification and/or unambiguous diagnosability. Our results outline the importance of considering different features for taxa diagnosis and illustrate the weakness of visual appearance-based identification (currently widely used for taxa determination) in our study complex.

Keywords

Appearance Identification mtDNA Plumage Subspecies Variability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to all the people who helped us with field and laboratory work, and especially to F. Akriotis, P. Arrojo, N. Baccetti, J. Blondel, R. Carini, J. Cecere, F. Davoli, A. De Faveri, A. Flitti, P. Giusti, F. Guidali, O. Hameau, K. Kravos, D. Iavicoli, N. Mucci, P. Perret, E. Savo, D. Sere, A. Sorace, E. Strinella and P. Sunyer. A special thanks goes to O. Janni, M. Wink and an anonymous reviewer for very helpful comments and to all volunteer ringers at Ventotene, who were partly supported by a grant from the Riserva Naturale Statale Isole di Ventotene e Santo Stefano. We also thank the Municipality of Ventotene and the Centro di Educazione Ambientale Luca Bertolaccini for support and logistics. Results from “Progetto Piccole Isole” ISPRA: paper n 39.

Supplementary material

10336_2009_457_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (320 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 319 kb)

References

  1. Alström P, Rasmussen PC, Olsson U, Sundberg P (2008) Species delimitation based on multiple criteria: the Spotted Bush Warbler Bradypterus thoracicus complex (Aves: Megaluridae). Zool J Linn Soc 154:291–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brambilla M (2007) Distribuzione, ecologia e differenziazione in Sylvia cantillans. PhD thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, MilanGoogle Scholar
  3. Brambilla M, Guidali F (2005) Quando la voce è tutto: l’identificazione delle sottospecie di sterpazzolina Sylvia cantillans. Avocetta 29:154Google Scholar
  4. Brambilla M, Tellini Florenzano G, Sorace A, Guidali F (2006) Geographical distribution of Subalpine Warbler Sylvia cantillans subspecies in mainland Italy. Ibis 148:568–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brambilla M, Reginato F, Guidali F (2007) Habitat use by Moltoni’s Warbler Sylvia cantillans moltonii in Italy. Ornis Fenn 84:91–96Google Scholar
  6. Brambilla M, Vitulano S, Spina F, Baccetti N, Gargallo G, Fabbri E, Guidali F, Randi E (2008a) A molecular phylogeny of the Sylvia cantillans complex: Cryptic species within the Mediterranean basin. Mol Phylogenet Evol 48:461–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brambilla M, Janni O, Guidali F, Sorace A (2008b) Song perception among incipient species as a mechanism for reproductive isolation. J Evol Biol 21:651–657CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brambilla M, Quaglierini A, Reginato F, Vitulano S, Guidali F (2008c) Syntopic taxa in the Sylvia cantillans species complex. Acta Ornithol 43:217–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cramp S (ed) (1992) The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol 6. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. de Queiroz K (1999) The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In: Wilson RA (ed) Species, new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 49–89Google Scholar
  11. Helbig AJ, Knox AG, Parkin TD, Sangster G, Collinson M (2002) Guidelines for assigning species rank. Ibis 144:518–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kidd MG, Friesen VL (1998) Sequence variation in the Guillemot (Alcidae: Cepphus) mitochondrial control region and its nuclear homolog. Mol Biol Evol 15:61–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Li S-H, Li J-W, Han L-X, Yao C-Y, Shi H, Lei F-M, Yen C (2006) Species delimitation in the Hwamei Garrulax canorus. Ibis 148:698–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martens J, Sun Y-H, Päckert M (2008) Intraspecific differentiation of Sino-Himalayan bush-dwelling Phylloscopus leaf warblers, with description of two new taxa (P. fuscatus, P. fuligiventer, P. affinis, P. armandii, P. subaffinis). Vertebr Zool 58:233–266Google Scholar
  17. Olsson U, Alström P, Ericson PGP, Sundberg P (2005) Non-monophyletic taxa and cryptic species—evidence from a molecular phylogeny of leaf-warblers (Phylloscopus, Aves). Mol Phylogenet Evol 36:261–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Päckert M, Martens J, Dietzen C, Wink M, Kvist L (2006) Radiation of Atlantic goldcrests Regulus regulus spp.: evidence of a new taxon from the Canary Islands. J Avian Biol 37:364–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Randi E, Tabarroni C, Rimondi S, Lucchini V, Sfougaris A (2003) Phylogeography of the rock partridge (Alectoris graeca). Mol Ecol 12:2201–2214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shirihai H, Gargallo G, Helbig AJ (2001) Sylvia Warblers. Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Sorenson MD, Fleischer RC (1996) Multiple independent transpositions of mitochondrial DNA control region sequences to the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:15239–15243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Swofford DL (2001) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods) version 408b. Sinauer Assoc, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  23. Watson DM (2005) Diagnosable versus distinct: evaluating species limits in birds. BioScience 55:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wink M (2006) Use of DNA markers to study bird migration. J Ornithol 147:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mattia Brambilla
    • 1
  • Severino Vitulano
    • 2
  • Andrea Ferri
    • 2
  • Fernando Spina
    • 2
  • Elena Fabbri
    • 2
  • Ettore Randi
    • 2
  1. 1.Fondazione Lombardia per l’AmbienteSettore Biodiversità e Aree protetteMilanItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA) Sede amministrativa ex-INFSOzzano EmiliaItaly

Personalised recommendations