Journal of Ornithology

, 151:241 | Cite as

Tail-racket removal increases hematocrit in male Turquoise-browed Motmots (Eumomota superciliosa)

Short Note


Graduated avian tails with short outer tail feathers and longer central tail feathers are thought to handicap aerodynamic function. The Turquoise-browed Motmot (Eumomota superciliosa) has a highly graduated tail with a long racket-tip that may impose a substantial aerodynamic cost. Previous research on this species has demonstrated a moderate sexual dimorphism in the tail, and has provided evidence that the racketed tail functions as a sexually selected trait only in males. To explore whether costs are associated with the maintenance of the ornamental male tail, I tested whether tail-racket removal affected hematocrit, a measure of condition and metabolic activity. I removed tail rackets from a manipulated group of males and left the rackets intact among a control group. I then compared change in hematocrit between the two groups over the breeding season. Males with rackets removed experienced a greater increase in hematocrit than did control males. This result suggests that males either experienced an increase in condition after being emancipated from bearing a costly sexually selected ornament, or that a social cost was associated with the loss of an ornament used in communication. This work supports previous research showing that the male tail functions as a sexual signal.


Aerodynamic costs Hematocrit Tail-plumage Sexual selection Eumomota superciliosa 



This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (DDIG-0206584; IRFP-0700953). Steve Emlen, Paul Sherman, Kern Reeve, and David Winkler provided useful comments throughout the study. I am thankful to Chris Egan, Valerie Steen, Erin Macchia, and Jennifer Smith for their help in the field. Bob Montgomerie and anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on the manuscript. This research was conducted under Cornell University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol 99-23-02.


  1. Amand WB (1986) Avian clinical hematology and blood chemistry. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1982) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balmford A, Jones IL, Thomas ALR (1993) On avian asymmetry––evidence of natural-selection for symmetrical tails and wings in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 252:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F, Pellatt EJ (1998) Sexual selection in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata: condition, sex traits and immune capacity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown ME (1996) Assessing body condition in birds. In: Nolan V, Ketterson ED (eds) Current ornithology. Plenum, New York, pp 67–135Google Scholar
  6. Burley N (1988) The differential-allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am Nat 132:611–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bush BM (1975) Veterinary laboratory manual. Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell TW (1988) Avian hematology and cytology. Iowa State University Press, IowaGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell TW, Dein FJ (1984) Avian hematology. The basics. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 14:223–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter FL (1975) Bird hematocrits––effects of high-altitude and strength of flight. Comp Biochem Physiol 50:415–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coles BH (1997) Avian medicine and surgery. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Dein J (1986) Hematology. In: Harrison GJ, Harrison WR (eds) Clinical avian medicine. Saunders, London, pp 174–191Google Scholar
  13. Evans MR (2004) Limits on the evolution of tail ornamentation in birds. Am Nat 163:341–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans MR, Hatchwell BJ (1992) An experimental-study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird.1. The role of pectoral tufts in territorial defense. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:413–419Google Scholar
  15. Evans MR, Thomas ALR (1992) The aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird––measuring the cost of a handicap. Anim Behav 43:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fair J, Whitaker S, Pearson B (2007) Sources of variation in haematocrit in birds. Ibis 149:535–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzpatrick S (1999) Tail length in birds in relation to tail shape, general flight ecology and sexual selection. J Evol Biol 12:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hõrak P, Ots I, Murumägi A (1998) Haematological health state indices of reproducing Great Tits: a response to brood size manipulation. Funct Ecol 12:750–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones PJ (1983) Hematocrit values of breeding red-billed queleas Quelea quelea (Aves, Ploceidae) in relation to body condition and thymus activity. J Zool 201:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Limbourg T, Mateman AC, Andersson S, Lessells CM (2004) Female blue tits adjust parental effort to manipulated male UV attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1903–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McFarlane ML (2006) Tail length and flight performance in Cape sugarbirds (Promerops cafer). Dissertation, University of Stellenbosch, MatielandGoogle Scholar
  22. Møller AP, Barbosa A, Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Merino S, Saino N (1998) Sexual selection and tail streamers in the barn swallow. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy TG (2006) Predator-elicited visual signal: why the turquoise-browed motmot wag-displays its racketed tail. Behav Ecol 17:547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murphy TG (2007a) Dishonest ‘preemptive’ pursuit-deterrent signal? Why the turquoise-browed motmot wags its tail before feeding nestlings. Anim Behav 73:965–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murphy TG (2007b) Racketed tail of the male and female turquoise-browed motmot: male but not female tail length correlates with pairing success, performance, and reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:911–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murphy TG (2008) Lack of assortative mating for tail, body size, or condition in the monomorphic elaborate turquoise-browed motmot (Eumomota superciliosa). Auk 125:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orejuela JE (1977) Comparative biology of turquoise-browed motmot and blue-crowned motmot in the Yucatan Peninsula Mexico. Living Bird 16:193–208Google Scholar
  28. Palomeque J, Planas J (1978) Blood-volume in domestic pigeons. Comp Biochem Phys A 59:413–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peek FW (1972) Experimental study of territorial function of vocal and visual display in male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Anim Behav 20:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Potti J, Moreno J, Merino S, Frias O, Rodriguez R (1999) Environmental and genetic variation in the haematocrit of fledgling pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Oecologia 120:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pryke SR, Andersson S (2005) Experimental evidence for female choice and energetic costs of male tail elongation in red-collared widowbirds. Biol J Linn Soc 86:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pryke SR, Andersson S, Lawes MJ, Piper SE (2002) Carotenoid status signaling in captive and wild red-collared widowbirds: independent effects of badge size and color. Behav Ecol 13:622–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saino N, Cuervo JJ, Krivacek M, de Lope F, Møller AP (1997a) Experimental manipulation of tail ornament size affects the hematocrit of male barn swallows (Hirundo rustica). Oecologia 110:186–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saino N, Cuervo JJ, Ninni P, de Lope F, Møller AP (1997b) Haematocrit correlates with tail ornament size in three populations of the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). Funct Ecol 11:604–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott PE, Martin RF (1986) Clutch size and fledging success in the turquoise-browed motmot Eumomota superciliosa. Auk 103:8–13Google Scholar
  36. Thomas ALR (1993) On the aerodynamics of birds’ tails. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 340:361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomas ALR, Balmford A (1995) How natural selection shapes birds’ tails. Am Nat 146:848–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Winquist T, Lemon RE (1994) Sexual selection and exaggerated male tail length in birds. Am Nat 143:95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyTrinity UniversitySan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations