Journal of Ornithology

, 151:201 | Cite as

Variation in body condition of breeding Savi’s Warblers Locustella luscinioides: the reproductive stress and flight adaptation hypothesis revisited

Original Article

Abstract

Current theory suggests that mass change in adult birds while breeding may be adaptive (to reduce wing-loading during nestling feeding) or result from physiological stress. To test which might be more important in determining mass loss in breeding Savi’s Warblers (Locustella luscinioides), we used a new approach in which the variation in four indices of body condition was described: weight, fat score, muscle score and lean weight (i.e. excluding fat and muscle). We expected weight variations to be adaptive if they involved changes in fat and lean weight, whereas physiological stress should influence the muscle score to a greater extent. As in other species, females showed a greater variation in weight, and carried more fat, than males during the breeding cycle. During incubation, females had greater weight and fat score than males. The weight remained constant and lean weight declined in both sexes, whereas females increased in muscle, which probably reflects the regression of the reproductive organs. During the nestling stage, both sexes declined significantly in all four indices of condition, showing evidence of physiological stress. However, the greater decline in weight in females than in males is consistent with the flight-adaptation hypothesis, as are the cyclic changes in lean weight associated with the various nesting attempts. The fact that both sexes declined significantly in weight, muscle and lean weight with an increasing number of nesting attempts, but not in fat, which was recovered after each nestling period, also indicates that both reproductive stress and adaptive changes occur during breeding. When the whole breeding season was considered, females showed a greater decline in muscle than males, which we interpret to be evidence for a greater reproductive stress in females. We suggest that the small breast muscle size and depleted protein reserves at the end of the breeding period might influence future survival through impaired flight ability and a compromised post-breeding moult.

Keywords

Body condition Fat Muscle Reproduction Physiological stress 

References

  1. Carrascal LM, Senar JC, Mozetich I, Uribe F, Domenech J (1998) Interactions among environmental stress, body condition, nutritional status, and dominance in great tits. Auk 115:727–738Google Scholar
  2. Cavitt JF, Thompson CF (1997) Mass loss in breeding house wrens: effects of food supplements. Ecology 78:2512–2523Google Scholar
  3. Cichoń M (2000) Cost of incubation and immunocompetence in the collared flycatcher. Oecologia 125:453–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cichoń M (2001) Body-mass changes in female collared flycatchers: state-dependent strategy. Auk 118:550–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cucco M, Malacarne G (1997) The effect of supplemental food on time budget and body condition in the black redstart Phoenicurus ochrurus. Ardea 85:211–221Google Scholar
  6. Dietz MW, Piersma T, Hedenström A, Brugge M (2007) Intraspecific variation in avian pectoral muscle mass: constraints on maintaining maneuverability with increasing body mass. Funct Ecol 21:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freed LA (1981) Loss of mass in breeding wrens: stress or adaptation? Ecology 62:1179–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaston AJ, Hipfner JM (2006) Body mass changes in Brünnich’s guillemots Uria lomvia with age and breeding stage. J Avian Biol 37:101–109Google Scholar
  9. Gosler AG (1991) On the use of greater covert moult and pectoral muscle as measures of condition in passerines with data for the great tit Parus major. Bird Study 38:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gosler AG (1996) Environmental and social determinants of winter fat storage in the great tit Parus major. J Anim Ecol 65:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hillström L (1995) Body mass reduction during reproduction in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: physiological stress or adaptation for lowered cost of locomotion? Funct Ecol 9:807–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hinsley SA, Rothery P, Ferns PN, Bellamy PE, Dawson A (2003) Wood size and timing of moult in birds: potential consequences for plumage quality and bird survival. Ibis 145:337–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holt S, Whitfield DP, Duncan K, Rae S, Smith RD (2002) Mass loss in incubating Eurasian dotterel: adaptation or constraint? J Avian Biol 33:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houston DC, Donnan D, Jones P (1995) Use of labelled methionine to investigate the contribution of muscle proteins to egg production in zebra finches. J Comp Physiol B 164:161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaiser A (1993) A new multi-category classification of subcutaneous fat deposits in songbirds. J Field Ornithol 64:246–255Google Scholar
  16. Kullberg C, Metcalfe NB, Houston DC (2002) Impaired flight ability during incubation in the pied flycatcher. J Avian Biol 33:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lind J, Jakobsson S (2001) Body building and concurrent mass loss: flight adaptations in tree sparrows. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1915–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindström A, Kvist A, Piersma T, Dekinga A, Dietz MW (2000) Avian pectoral muscle size rapidly tracks body mass changes during flight, fasting and fuelling. J Exp Biol 203:913–919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Merilä J, Wiggins DA (1997) Mass loss in breeding blue tits: the role of energetic stress. J Anim Ecol 66:452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merkle MS, Barclay MRM (1996) Body mass variation in breeding mountain bluebirds Sialia currucoides: evidence of stress or adaptation for flight? J Anim Ecol 65:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moe B, Langseth I, Fyhn M, Gabrielsen GW, Bech C (2002) Changes in body condition in breeding kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla. J Avian Biol 33:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moreno J (1989a) Strategies of mass change in breeding birds. Biol J Linn Soc 37:297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moreno J (1989b) Body-mass variation in breeding Northern Wheatears: a field experiment with supplementary food. Condor 91:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moreno J, Carlson A (1989) Clutch size and the cost of incubation in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Scand 20:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nagy LR, Stanculescu D, Holmes RT (2007) Mass loss by breeding female songbirds: food supplementation supports energetic stress hypothesis in black-throated blue warblers. Condor 109:304–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neto JM, Gosler AG (2005) Breeding biology of the Savi’s warbler Locustella luscinioides in Portugal. Ardea 93:89–100Google Scholar
  27. Neto JM, Gosler AG (2006) Post-juvenile and post-breeding moult of Savi’s warblers Locustella luscinioides in Portugal. Ibis 148:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Norberg RA (1981) Temporary weight decrease in breeding birds may result in more fledged young. Am Nat 118:838–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nur N (1984) The consequences of brood size for breeding blue tits I. Adult survival, weight change and the cost of reproduction. J Anim Ecol 53:479–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pettifor RA, Perrins CM, McCleery RH (1988) Individual optimisation of clutch size in great tits. Nature 336:160–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rands SA, Houston AI, Cuthill IC (2006) Measurement of mass change in breeding birds: bibliography and discussion of measurement techniques. Ring Migr 23:1–5Google Scholar
  32. Ricklefs RE, Hussel DJT (1984) Changes in adult mass associated with the nesting cycle in the European starling. Ornis Scandinavica 15:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanz JJ, Moreno J (1995) Mass loss in brooding female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca: no evidence for reproductive stress. J Avian Biol 26:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Slagsvold T, Johansen MA (1998) Mass loss in female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca during late incubation: supplementation fails to support the reproductive stress hypothesis. Ardea 86:203–211Google Scholar
  35. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Suárez F, Traba J, Herranz J (2005) Body mass changes in female tawny pipits Anthus campestris during the nestling stage. J Ornith 146:372–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines, 4th edn. Lars Svensson, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  38. Svensson E, Nilsson J-A (1997) The trade-off between molt and parental care: a sexual conflict in the blue tit? Behav Ecol 8:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Swaddle JP, Biewener AA (2000) Exercise and reduced muscle mass in starlings. Nature 406:585–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Veasey JS, Houston DC, Metcalfe NB (2000) Flight muscle atrophy and predation risk in breeding birds. Funct Ecol 14:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veasey JS, Houston DC, Metcalfe NB (2001) A hidden cost of reproduction: the trade-off between clutch size and escape take-off speed in female zebra finches. J Anim Ecol 70:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Woodburn RJW, Perrins CM (1997) Weight change and the body reserves of female blue tits, Parus caeruleus, during the breeding season. J Zool 243:789–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIBIO/UP-Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos GenéticosUniversidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de VairãoVairãoPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Animal EcologyEcology BuildingLundSweden
  3. 3.Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations