Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 150, Issue 4, pp 845–852 | Cite as

Distance from the forest edge matters in habitat selection of the Blue-footed Booby Sula nebouxii

  • Adolfo Christian Montes-Medina
  • Hugh Drummond
  • Sin-Yeon Kim
Original Article


The relationships between breeding site location in forest habitat and age, behaviour and reproductive performance of Blue-footed Boobies Sula nebouxii were examined in two different plots on the northeast corner of Isla Isabel, Mexico. Birds nesting closer to the forest edge, where nest density is highest, laid their clutches earlier and fledged more chicks. In plot A, proximity to the forest edge was associated with more wakefulness and wing drooping in chicks and more interactions with other species in female breeders. In plot B, ages of breeders increased closer to the forest edge. The patterns of nest density, laying date and age distribution suggest that, on the northeast corner of Isla Isabel, the boobies prefer to nest close to the forest edge, possibly because the benefits, including easy landing and take-off, are greater than the costs associated with inclement weather, high density of conspecifics and allospecifics, and negative social interactions.


Behaviour Habitat selection Nest location Sula nebouxii 



We thank to two anonymous reviewers and Peter H. Becker for very helpful comments on the manuscript. We are very grateful to Rene Beamonte, Cristina Carmona, Fabrice Dentressangle, Myrna Hernández, Natalia Lifshitz, Beatriz Peña, Cristina Rodriguez, Oscar Sánchez, Jaime Villareal and Emma Villaseñor who provided help in fieldwork. We also thank many fishermen and the Mexican navy for friendship and the logistical efforts. S.-Y. Kim was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (CGL2006-10357-C02-01/BOS). The investigation we performed did not involve any licensed procedures and complied with the current laws of Mexico.


  1. Bartholomew GA, Dawson WR (1954) Temperature regulation in young pelicans, herons, and gulls. Ecology 35:466–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brouwer A, Spaans AL (1994) Egg predation in the herring gull Larus argentatus: why does it vary so much between nests? Ardea 82:223–230Google Scholar
  3. Burger J (1980) Territory size differences in relation to reproductive stage and type of intruder in herring gulls (Larus argentatus). Auk 97:733–741Google Scholar
  4. Cody ML (1985) Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Côté SD (2000) Aggressiveness in king penguins in relation to reproductive status and territory location. Anim Behav 59:813–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley MJ (2005) Statistics: an introduction using R. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis JWF (1976) Breeding success and experience in the arctic skua Stercorarius parasiticus (L.). J Anim Ecol 45:531–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drummond H (2001) The control and function of agonism in avian broodmates. In: Slater PJB, Rosenblatt JS, Snowdon CT, Roper TJ (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, vol 30. Academic Press, New York, pp 261–301Google Scholar
  9. Drummond H, Gonzalez E, Osorno JL (1986) Parent-offspring cooperation in the blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drummond H, Torres R, Krishnan VV (2003) Buffered development: resilience after aggressive subordination in infancy. Am Nat 161:794–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Espie RHM, Oliphant LW, James PC, Warkentin IG, Lieske DJ (2000) Age-dependent breeding performance in merlins (Falco columbarius). Ecology 81:3404–3415Google Scholar
  12. Ezard THG, Becker PH, Coulson T (2007) Correlations between age, phenotype, and individual contribution to population growth in Common Terns. Ecology 88:2496–2504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forero MG, Tella JL, Hobson KA, Bertellotti M, Blanco G (2002) Conspecific food competition explains variability in colony size: a test in Magellanic penguins. Ecology 83:3466–3475Google Scholar
  14. Fretwell SD (1969) Dominance behavior and winter habitat distribution in juncos (Junco hyemalis). Bird Banding 40:1–25Google Scholar
  15. Geslin T, Questiau S, Eybert M-C (2004) Age-related improvement of reproductive success in bluethroats Luscinia svecica. Bird Study 51:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill G (1988) Age, plumage brightness, territory quality, and reproductive success in the black-headed grosbeak. Condor 90:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
  18. Howell TR, Bartholomew GA (1962) Temperature regulation in the red-tailed tropic bird and the red-footed booby. Condor 64:6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim S-Y, Monaghan P (2005a) Effect of vegetation on nest microclimate and breeding performance of lesser black-backed gulls (Larus fuscus). J Ornithol 146:176–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim S-Y, Monaghan P (2005b) Interacting effects of nest shelter and breeding quality on behaviour and breeding performance of herring gulls. Anim Behav 69:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim S-Y, Torres R, Rodriguez C, Drummond H (2007) Effects of breeding success, mate fidelity and senescence on breeding dispersal of male and female blue-footed boobies. J Anim Ecol 76:471–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kokko H (1999) Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. J Anim Ecol 68:940–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kokko H, Harris MP, Wanless S (2004) Competition for breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalge. J Anim Ecol 73:367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langston NE, Freeman S, Rohwer S, Gori D (1990) The evolution of female body size in red-winged blackbirds: the effects of timing of breeding, social competition, and reproductive energetics. Evolution 44:1764–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lozano GA, Perreault S, Lemon RE (1996) Age, arrival date and reproductive success of male American redstarts Setophaga ruticilla. J Avian Biol 27:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meddis R (1975) On the function of sleep. Anim Behav 23:676–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Møller AP (1994) Phenotype-dependent arrival time and its consequences in a migratory bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nelson JB (1978) The Sulidae: gannets and boobies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Osorio-Beristain M, Drummond H (1993) Natal dispersal and deferred breeding in the blue-footed booby. Auk 110:234–239Google Scholar
  30. Pärt T (2001) Experimental evidence of environmental effects on age-specific reproductive success: the importance of resource quality. Proc R Soc London B 268:2267–2271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearson J, Nisbet ICT, Ottinger MA (2005) Age-related differences in nest defense in common terns: relationship to other life-history parameters. Age 27:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perdeck AC, Cave AJ (1992) Laying date in the coot: effects of age and mate choice. J Anim Ecol 61:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. R Development Core Team (2006) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.3.1 [Internet]; [cited 2006 June]. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; available from:
  34. Ratcliffe N, Furness RW, Hamer KC (1998) The interactive effects of age and food supply on the breeding ecology of great skuas. J Anim Ecol 67:853–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryder PL, Ryder JP (1981) Reproductive performance of ring-billed gulls in relation to nest location. Condor 83:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Salzman AG (1982) The selective importance of heat stress in gull nest location. Ecology 63:742–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stamps J, Anda MC, Perez C, Drummond H (2002) Collaborative tactics for nest site selection by pairs of blue-footed boobies. Behaviour 139:1383–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stokes DL, Dee Boersma P (2000) Nesting density and reproductive success in a colonial seabird, the Magellanic penguin. Ecology 81:2878–2891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sutherland WJ (1996) From individual behaviour to population ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Tenaza R (1971) Behaviour and nesting success relative to nest location in Adelie penguins. Condor 73:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Torres R, Drummond H (1999a) Does large size make daughters of blue-footed boobies more expensive than sons? J Anim Ecol 68:1133–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Torres R, Drummond H (1999b) Variably male-biased sex ratio in a marine bird with females larger than males. Oecologia 118:16–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tveraa T, Sether B-E, Aanes R, Erikstad KE (1998) Regulation of food provisioning in the Antarctic petrel; the importance of parental body condition and chick body mass. J Anim Ecol 67:699–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Velando A, Drummond H, Torres R (2006) Senescent birds redouble reproductive effort when ill: confirmation of the terminal investment hypothesis. Proc R Soc London B 273:1443–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wagner RH (1993) The pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds: a new hypothesis of colony formation. J Theor Biol 163:333–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wagner RH, Danchin E, Boulinier T, Helfenstein F (2000) Colonies as byproducts of commodity selection. Behav Ecol 11:572–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wiklund CG (1982) Fieldfare (Turdus pilaris) breeding success in relation to colony size, nest position and association with merlins (Falco columbarius). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adolfo Christian Montes-Medina
    • 1
  • Hugh Drummond
    • 1
  • Sin-Yeon Kim
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Instituto de EcologíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía AnimalUniversidade de VigoVigoSpain

Personalised recommendations