Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 149, Issue 2, pp 161–167 | Cite as

Sex-differentiated migration patterns, protandry and phenology in North European songbird populations

Original Article


This study aims to investigate causes and mechanisms controlling protandrous migration patterns (the earlier breeding area arrival of males relative to females) and inter-sexual differences in timing of migration in relation to the recent climate-driven changes in phenology. Using standardised ringing data from a single site for eight North European migratory passerines collected throughout 22 years, we analysed sex-differentiated migration patterns, protandry and phenology of the entire populations. Our results show protandrous patterns for the first as well as later arriving individuals for all studied species. Males show more synchronous migration patterns compared to females and, hence, first arriving females followed males more closely than later arriving individuals. However, we found no inter-sexual differences in arrival trends as both sexes advance spring arrival over time with the largest change for the first arriving individuals. These findings seem in support of the “mate opportunity” hypothesis, as the arrival of males and females is strongly coupled and both sexes seem to compete for early arrival. Changes in timing of arrival in males and females as a response to climatic changes may influence subsequent mating decisions, with subsequent feedbacks on population dynamics such as reproductive success and individual fitness. However, during decades of consistent earlier spring arrival in all phases of migration we found no evidence of inter-sexual phenological differences.


Climate change Northern Europe Passerines Phenology Protandry 


  1. Ahola M, Laaksonen T, Sippola K, Eeva T, Rainio K, Lehikoinen E (2004) Variation in climate warming along the migration route uncouples arrival and breeding dates. Glob Change Biol 10:1610–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bairlein F, Winkel W (2001) Birds and climate chance. In: Lozan JL, Grassl H, Hupfer P (eds) Climate of the 21st century: changes and risks. Scientific Facts, GEO, pp 278–282Google Scholar
  3. Catry P, Campos A, Almada V, Cresswell W (2004) Winter segregation of migrant European robins Erithacus rubecula in relation to sex, age and size. J Avian Biol 35:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Catry P, Lecoq M, Araújo A, Conway G, Felgueiras M, King MB, Rumsey S, Salima H, Tenreiro P (2005) Differential migration of chiffchaffs Phylloscopus collybita and P. ibericus in Europe and Africa. J Avian Biol 36:184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coppack T, Tøttrup AP, Spottiswoode C (2006) Degree of protandry reflects level of extrapair paternity in migratory songbirds. J Ornithol 147:260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Francis CM, Cooke F (1986) Differential timing of spring migration in wood warblers (Parulinae). Auk 103:548–556Google Scholar
  7. Francis CM, Cooke F (1990) Differential timing of spring migration in rose-breasted grosbeaks. J Field Ornithol 61:404–412Google Scholar
  8. Grewal PS, Selvan S, Lewis EE, Gaugler R (1993) Male insect-parasitic nematodes—a colonizing sex. Experientia 49:605–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gunnarsson B, Johnsson J (1990) Protandry and molting to maturity in the spider Pityohyphantes phrygianus. Oikos 59:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasselquist D (1998) Polygyny in great reed warblers: a long-term study of factors contributing to male fitness. Ecology 79:2376–2390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jonzen N, Linden A, Ergon T, Knudsen E, Vik JO, Rubolini D, Piacentini D, Brinch C, Spina F, Karlsson L, Stervander M, Andersson A, Waldenstrom J, Lehikoinen A, Edvardsen E, Solvang R, Stenseth NC (2006) Rapid advance of spring arrival dates in long-distance migratory birds. Science 312:1959–1961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ketterson ED, Nolan V (1976) Geographic variation and its climatic correlates in sex-ratio of eastern-wintering dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis Hyemalis). Ecology 57:679–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kokko H (1999) Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. J Anim Ecol 68:940–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kokko H, Gunnarsson TG, Morrell LJ, Gill JA (2006) Why do female migratory birds arrive later than males? J Anim Ecol 75:1293–1303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Komar O, O’Shea BJ, Peterson AT, Navarro-Siguenza AG (2005) Evidence of latitudinal sexual segregation among migratory birds wintering in Mexico. Auk 122:938–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lehikoinen E, Sparks TH, Zalakevicius M (2004) Arrival and departure dates. In: Møller AP, Fiedler W, Berthold P (eds) Birds and climate change. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Michener GR (1983) Spring emergence schedules and vernal behaviour of Richardson’s ground squirrels: why do males emerge from hibernation before females? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morbey Y (2000) Protandry in Pacific salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1252–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morbey YE, Ydenberg RC (2001) Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review. Ecol Lett 4:663–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Myers JP (1981) A test of three hypotheses for latitudinal segregation of the sexes in wintering birds. Can J Zool 59:1527–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Otahal CD (1995) Sexual differences in Wilson Warbler migration. J Field Ornithol 66:60–69Google Scholar
  22. Quader S (2005) Mate choice and its implications for conservation and management. Curr Sci 89:1220–1229Google Scholar
  23. Rabøl J, Rahbek C (2002) Population trends in the Baltic passerine migrants, elucidated by a combination of ringing data and point- and summer-count indices. Dansk Ornitol Foren Tidsskr 96:15–38Google Scholar
  24. Rainio K, Laaksonen T, Ahola M, Vahatalo AV, Lehikoinen E (2006) Climatic responses in spring migration of boreal and arctic birds in relation to wintering area and taxonomy. J Avian Biol 37:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rainio K, Tøttrup AP, Lehikoinen E, Coppack T (2007) Has climate change affected the degree of protandry in migratory songbirds? Climate Research (in press)Google Scholar
  26. Rubolini D, Spina F, Saino N (2004) Protandry and sexual dimorphism in trans-Saharan migratory birds. Behav Ecol 15:592–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spottiswoode C, Tøttrup AP, Coppack T (2006) Sexual selection predicts advancement of avian spring migration in response to climate change. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:3023–3029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  29. Thorup K, Tøttrup AP, Rahbek C (2007) Patterns of phenological changes in migratory birds. Oecologia 151:697–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tøttrup AP, Thorup K, Rahbek C (2006a) Changes in timing of autumn migration in North European songbird populations. Ardea 94:527–536Google Scholar
  31. Tøttrup AP, Thorup K, Rahbek C (2006b) Patterns of change in timing of spring migration in North European songbird populations. J Avian Biol 37:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang G, Greenfield MD, Shelly TE (1990) Inter-male competition for high-quality host-plants: the evolution of protandry in a territorial grasshopper. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Macroecology, Institute of BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Zoological Museum and Center for Macroecology, Institute of BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations