Advertisement

Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 149, Issue 1, pp 123–130 | Cite as

Cryptic plumage signaling in Aphelocoma Scrub-Jays

  • Eli S. Bridge
  • Jennifer Hylton
  • Muir D. Eaton
  • Louis Gamble
  • Stephan J. Schoech
Original Article

Abstract

Recent studies of avian vision and plumage coloration have revealed a surprising degree of cryptic sexual dimorphism, with many examples of male–female differences in UV reflectance that are invisible to humans. We examined the potential for male–female and adult–subadult differences in plumage coloration in the genus Aphelocoma. This group of jays comprises 10 phylogenetic species, which are found across southern and central North America and include cooperatively breeding species, as well as species that form socially monogamous pair-bonds typical of most species of birds. Our goal was to determine whether male–female and adult–subadult differences in plumage coloration were more common in species with complex social systems (i.e., cooperative breeders). We collected a series of reflectance measurements from hundreds of museum specimens and analyzed the results using a model of an avian visual system. We found that age- and sex-related differences were not more frequent in species that practice cooperative breeding. Hence, plumage signaling relating sex and age may not be strongly associated with complex social systems. Rather, the relative lack of a stable and familiar social environment, as well as other selective pressures and constraints (e.g., habitat use and plumage complexity), may have favored a greater degree of age- and sex-related differences in plumage coloration in jays that practice simple biparental care.

Keywords

Plumage reflectance Cooperative breeding Avian vision Avian color space Sexual dichromatism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Museum of Natural History, the Field Museum, The Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, and the University of Kansas Natural History Museum, as well as their ornithology curators and collection managers for being so generous and accommodating with their specimens. Thanks also to the University of Memphis Biology department for funding E.S.B.'s participation in the 2006 IOC. E.S.B. also received supported as a post-doctoral fellow from a National Science Foundation grant (IOB-0346328) to S.J.S., who also was funded in part by this grant. J.H.’s participation in this research was supported by an NSF Undergraduate Mentoring in Environmental Biology (DBI-0309679) grant to the Department of Biology at the University of Memphis.

References

  1. Andersson S (1999) Morphology of UV reflectance in a whistling-thrush: implications for the study of structural colour signaling in birds. J Avian Biol 30:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson S Örnborg J, Andersson M (1998) Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC (1993) Ultraviolet vision in birds: what is its function? Vision Res 34:1471–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berggren A, Armstrong DP, Lewis RM (2004) Delayed plumage maturation increases overwinter survival in North Island robins. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2123–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JL, Li S-H (1995) Phylogeny of social behavior in Aphelocoma jays: a role for hybridization. Auk 112:464–472Google Scholar
  6. Brown CR, Bryant DM (1996) Energy expenditure during molt in dippers (Cinclus cinch): no evidence of elevated costs. Physiol Zool 69:1036–1056Google Scholar
  7. Burt DB, Peterson AT (1993) Biology of the cooperatively breeding scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) of Oaxaca, Mexico. Auk 110:207–214Google Scholar
  8. Curry RL, Delaney KS (2002) Island Scrub-Jay Aphelocoma insularis. In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, No 713. Birds of North America, Philadelphia, pp 1–36Google Scholar
  9. Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Partridge JC, Maier EJ (1999) Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian sexual dichromatism. Am Nat 153:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dale J (2006) Intraspecific variation in coloration. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration, Volume 2, Function and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 36–86Google Scholar
  11. Dartnall HJA, Bowmaker JK, Mollon JD (1983) Human visual pigments—microspectrophotometric results from the eyes of 7 persons. Proc R Soc Lond B 220:115–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eaton MD (2005) Human vision fails to distinguish widespread sexual dichromatism among sexually ‘“monochromatic” birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10942–10946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eaton MD, Lanyon SM (2003) The ubiquity of avian ultraviolet plumage reflectance. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1721–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldsmith TH (1991) The evolution of visual pigments and colour vision. In: Gouras P (ed) The perception of colour vision and visual dysfunction, vol 6. Macmillan, London, pp 62–89Google Scholar
  15. Hart NS (2001) Variations in cone photoreceptor abundance and the visual ecology of birds. J Comp Physiol (A) 187:685–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart NS, Partridge JC, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD (2000) Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.). J Comp Physiol (A) 186:375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunt S, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Griffiths R (1999) Preferences for ultraviolet partners in the blue tit. Anim Behav 58:809–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawton MF, Lawton RO (1986) Heterochrony, deferred breeding, and avian sociality. Curr Ornithol 3:187–222Google Scholar
  19. Lyon BE, Montgomerie RD (1986) Delayed plumage maturation in passerine birds—reliable signaling by subordinate males. Evolution 40:605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McNaught MK, Owens IPF (2002) Interspecific variation in plumage colour among birds: species recognition or light environment? J Evol Biol 15:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McNett GD, Marchetti K (2005) Ultraviolet degradation in carotenoid patches: live versus museum specimens of wood warblers (Parulidae). Auk 122:793–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ödeen A, Håstad O (2003) Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA. Mol Biol Evol 20:855–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson AT (1991a) Geographic variation in the ontogeny of beak coloration of gray-breasted jays (Aphelocoma ultramarina). Condor 93:448–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peterson AT (1991b) Sociality and ontogeny of coloration in the blue-and-black jays. Wilson Bull 103:59–67Google Scholar
  25. Peterson AT, Burt DB (1992) Phylogenetic history of social evolution and habitat use in the Aphelocoma jays. Anim Behav 44:859–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pitelka FA (1945) Pterylography, molt, and age determination of American jays of the genus Aphelocoma. Condor 47:229–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pitelka FA (1951) Speciation and ecologic distribution in American jays of the genus Aphelocoma. Univ Calif Publ Zool 50:195–464Google Scholar
  28. Rice NH, Martinez-Meyer E, Peterson AT (2003) Ecological niche differentiation in the Aphelocoma jays: a phylogenetic perspective. Biol J Linn Soc 80:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vorobyev M, Osorio D (1998) Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vorobyev M, Osorio D, Bennett ATD, Marshall NJ, Cuthill IC (1998) Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours. J Comp Physiol (A) 183:621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Webber T, Brown JL (1994) Natural history of the unicolored jay in Chiapas, Mexico. Proc West Found Vert Zool 5:135–160Google Scholar
  32. Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW (1984) The Florida scrub jay: demography of a cooperatively-breeding bird. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eli S. Bridge
    • 1
  • Jennifer Hylton
    • 2
  • Muir D. Eaton
    • 3
  • Louis Gamble
    • 2
  • Stephan J. Schoech
    • 2
  1. 1.Oklahoma Biological SurveyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentUniversity of MemphisMemphisUSA
  3. 3.Biology DepartmentDrake UniversityDes MoinesUSA

Personalised recommendations