Advertisement

Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 146, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Molecular data reveal some major adaptational shifts in the early evolution of the most diverse avian family, the Furnariidae

  • Jon Fjeldså
  • Martin Irestedt
  • Per G. P. Ericson
Original Article

Abstract

A robust phylogeny estimate for the family Furnariidae (sensu lato) was obtained using sequences of two nuclear introns and one mitochondrial gene (cyt b). Contrary to the widely accepted sister-group relationship of ovenbirds (Furnariinae) and woodcreepers (Dendrocolaptinae), a basal clade is suggested for Sclerurus and Geositta, while Xenops, hitherto considered an aberrant ovenbird, was found to occupy a basal position on the woodcreeper lineage. The morphological variation is re-interpreted in view of this revised phylogenetic hypothesis. Presumably, the remarkable adaptive radiation in this family started as primitive, Sclerurus-likes forms, which used the tail as a prop during terrestrial feeding, lured up to seek food on tree-trunks. The two basal woodcreeper genera, Xenops and then Glyphorynchus, show strong cranial specializations for hammering in wood, thus presenting a remarkable parallelism with the family Picidae, Xenops resembling a piculet, Glyphorynchus, a diminutive woodpecker. However, this specialization was lost in other woodcreepers, which show a more normal passerine skull, adapted for probing and prying in tree-trunk crevices and sallying for escaping insects. The ovenbirds developed a more flexible (rhynchokinetic) bill, well suited for probing and retrieving hidden prey in dead-leaf clusters and debris suspended in the vegetation, and in epiphyte masses. Adaptations to live in open terrain are secondary.

Keywords

Adaptative shifts Bayesian analysis Dendrocolaptinae Furnariinae Nuclear introns 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Tissue samples were collected over many years by the Swedish Museum of Natural History in collaboration with the Museo Nacional de Historia Natural del Paraguay, San Lorenzo, and by the Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen supported by the Danish Research Council (mainly grants 11–0380 and 9502155). Important samples were also obtained from the American Museum of Natural History, New York (Paul Sweet). Mari Källersjö and Pia Eldenäs provided logistic support and advice for the work at the Molecular Systematics Laboratory at the Swedish Museum of Natural History. We are also grateful to Jan Ohlson and Dario Zuccon for assistance with sequence procedures. Funding for the laboratory work was provided by the Swedish Research Council (grant no. 621–2001–2773). Jan Bolding Kristensen is thanked for careful preparation of skeletons, and Gary Graves and Storrs Olson for providing a Xenops skeleton. Also thanks to Per Christiansen for comments on the morphological observations and for agreeing to follow up with a more thorough ecomorphological analysis of the cranial morphology of Xenops and Glyphorynchus skulls. Bruno Walther is thanked for translations to German.

Supplementary material

Appendix1.pdf (29 kb)
Appendix 1 (PDF 30 KB)
Appendix2.pdf (21 kb)
Appendix 2 (PDF 22 KB)
SupplTables1-2.xls (82 kb)
Suppl. Tables1-2 (Excel 82 KB)

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademini Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  2. Alexio A (2002) Molecular systematics and the role of the “Várzea”-”Terra-Firme” ecotone in the diversification of Xiphorhynchus woodcreepers (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae). Auk 119:621–640Google Scholar
  3. Alström P, Ödeen A (2002) Incongruence between mitochondrial DNA, nuclear DNA and non-molecular data in the avian genus Motacilla: implications for estimates of species phylogenies. In: Alström P Species limits and systematics in some passerine birds. PhD Thesis, Uppsala University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  4. Ames PL (1971) The morphology of the syrinx in passerine birds. Bull Peabody Mus Nat Hist 37:1–194Google Scholar
  5. Bock WJ (1964) Kinetics of the avian skull. J Morph 114:1–42Google Scholar
  6. Bock WJ (1999) Functional and evolutionary morphology of woodpeckers. Ostrich 70:23–31Google Scholar
  7. Chesser RT (2004) Molecular systematics of New World Suboscine birds. Mol Phyl Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Cibois A, Kalyakin MV, Lian-Xian H, Pasquet E (2002) Molecular phylogenetics of babblers (Timaliidae): revaluation of the genera Yuhina and Stachyris. J Avian Biol 33:380–390Google Scholar
  9. Clench MH (1995) Body pterylosis of woodcreepers and ovenbirds (Dendrocolaptidae and Furnariidae). Auk 112:800–804Google Scholar
  10. Degnan S (1993) The perils of single gene trees mitochondrial versus single-copy nuclear DNA variation in white-eyes (Aves: Zosteropidae). Mol Ecol 2:219–225Google Scholar
  11. Desjardins P, Morais R (1990) Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome: a novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J Mol Biol 212:599–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards SV, Wilson AC (1990) Phylogenetically Informative length polymorphism and sequence variability in mitochondrial DNA of Australian songbirds (Pomatostomus) Genetics 126:695-711Google Scholar
  13. Ericson PGP, Christidis L, Irestedt M, Norman JA (2002) Systematic affinities of the lyrebirds (Passeriformes: Menura), with a novel classification of the major groups of passerine birds. Mol Phyl Evol 25:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ericson PGP, Christidis L, Cooper A, Irestedt M, Jackson J, Johansson US, Norman JA (2002) A Gondwanan origin of passerine birds supported by DNA sequences of the endemic New Sealand wrens. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:235–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Feduccia A (1973) Evolutionary trends in the Neotropical ovenbirds and woodhewers. Ornithol Monogr 13:1–69Google Scholar
  16. Fjeldså J, Zuccon D, Irestedt M, Johansson US, Ericson PG (2003) Sapayoa aenigma: a New World representative of ‘Old World suboscines’. Proc R Soc Lond B. [Suppl] 270:238–241Google Scholar
  17. Fürbringer M (1888) Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Systematik der Vögel, vols 1, 2. Holkema, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Heimerdinger MA, Ames PL (1967) Variation in the sternal norches of suboscine passeriform birds. Postilla Peabody Mus 105:1–44Google Scholar
  19. Hellmayr CE (1925) Catalogue of birds of the Americas, pt 4.Field Mus Nat Hist Zool Ser 13Google Scholar
  20. Heslewood MM, Elphinstone MS, Tidemann SC, Baverstock PR (1998) Myoglobin intron variation in the Gouldian Finch Erythrura gouldiae assessed by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 19:142 –151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Holder M., Lewis PO (2003) Phylogeny estimation: Traditional and Bayesian approaches. Nat Gen 4:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755Google Scholar
  23. Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Miller RE, Ronquist F (2002) Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst Biol 51:673–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Irestedt M, Fjeldså J, Johansson US, Ericson PGP (2002) Systematic relationships and biogeography of the tracheophone suboscines (Aves: Passeriformes). Mol Phyl Evol 23:499–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Irestedt M, Fjeldså J, Ericson PGP (2004a) Phylogeny and morphological plasticity in woodcreepers (Dendrocolaptinae). J Avian Biol 35:280–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irestedt M, Fjeldså J, Nylander JAA, Ericson PGP (2004b) Phylogenetic relationships of typical antbirds (Thamnophilidae) and test of incongruence based on Bayes factors. BMC Evol Biol 4:23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. James HF, Ericson PGP, Slikas B, Lei F-M, Gill FB, Olson SL (2003) Pseudopodoces humilis, a misclassified terrestrial tit (Aves: Paridae) of the Tibetan Plateau: evolutionary consequences of shifting adaptive zones. Ibis 145:185–202Google Scholar
  28. Johansson US, Irestedt M, Parsons TJ, Ericson PGP (2002) Basal phylogeny of the Tyrannoidea based on comparisons of cytochrome b and exons of nuclear c-myc and RAG-1 genes. Auk 199:984–995Google Scholar
  29. Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Pääbo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and se-quencing with conserved primers. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 86:6196–6200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kratter AW, Parker TA III (1997) Relationship of two bamboo-specialized foliage-gleaners: Automolus dorsalis and Anabazenops fuscus (Furnariidae). Ornithol Monogr 48:383–397Google Scholar
  31. Leisler B (1977) Ökomorphologische Aspekte von Speziation und adaptiver Radiation bei Vögeln. Vogelwarte 29:136–153Google Scholar
  32. Lipscomb D, Platnick N, Wheeler Q (2003) The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol 18:65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maddison WP, Donoghue MJ, Maddison DR (1984) Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst Zool 33:83–103Google Scholar
  34. Marantz CA, Aleixo A, Bevier LR, Patten MA (2003) Family Dendrocolaptidae (Woodcreepers). In: del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Christie D (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 8. Lynx, Barcelona, pp 358–447Google Scholar
  35. Moore WS (1995) Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 49:718–726Google Scholar
  36. Moore WS, DeFillipis VR (1997) The window of taxonomic resolution for phylogenies based on mitochondrial cytochrome b. In: Mindell DP (ed) Avian molecular evolution and systematics. Academic Press, London, pp 83–119Google Scholar
  37. Müller JP (1878) On certain variation in the vocal organs of the Passeres that have hitherto escaped notice. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Nylander JAA (2002) MrModeltest v.1.0. Program distributed by the author. Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  39. Raikow RJ (1994) A phylogeny of the woodcreepers (Dendrocolaptinae). Auk 111:104–114Google Scholar
  40. Raven PH, Axelrod D (1975) History of the flora and fauna of Latin America. Am Sci 63:420–429Google Scholar
  41. Remsen JV Jr (2003) Family Furnariidae (Ovenbirds). In: del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Christie D (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 8. Lynx, Barcelona, pp 162–357Google Scholar
  42. Ridgely RS, Tudor G (1994) The birds of South America, vol II. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosenberg KV (1997) Ecology of dead-leaf foraging specialists and their contribution to Amazonian bird diversity. Ornithol Monogr 48:673–700Google Scholar
  45. Sclater PL (1890) Catalogue of the birds in the British Museum, vol 15. British Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
  47. Slade RW, Moritz C, Heideman A, Hale PT (1993) Rapid assessment of single-copy nuclear DNA variation in diverse species. Mol Ecol 2:359 –373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Swofford DL (1998) Paup*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), v.4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  49. Vaurie C (1971) Classification of the ovenbirds (Furnariidae). Witherby, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Vaurie C (1980) Taxonomy and geographical distribution of the Furnariidae (Aves, Passeriformes). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 166:1–357Google Scholar
  51. Willis EO (1994) Review of: evolutionary trends in the Neotropical ovenbirds and woodhewers. Wilson Bull 86:487–489Google Scholar
  52. Zusi RL (1967) The role of the depressor mandibulae muscle in kinesis of the avian skull. Proc US Natl Mus 123:1–28Google Scholar
  53. Zyskowski K, Prum RO (1999) Phylogenetic analysis of the nest architecture of neotropical ovenbirds (Furnariidae). Auk 116:891–911Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V.  2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Fjeldså
    • 1
  • Martin Irestedt
    • 2
  • Per G. P. Ericson
    • 3
  1. 1.Zoological MuseumUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of StockholmStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Vertebrate Zoology and Molecular Systematics LaboratorySwedish Museum of Natural HistoryStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations