Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 145, Issue 4, pp 352–355 | Cite as

Chemistry of the uropygial gland secretion of Hume’s ground jay Pseudopodoces humilis and its taxonomic implications

  • Axel Gebauer
  • Jürgen Jacob
  • Martin Kaiser
  • Siegfried Eck
Short Note

Abstract

Hume’s ground jay (Pseudopodoces humilis), a species living in the high altitude steppes of the Qinghai-Tibet-Plateau (China), was traditionally thought to be a ground jay related to the genus Podoces (Corvidae). Recently, however, based on three independent datasets (comparative osteology, nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences), this species was discovered to be a member of the Paridae. Here, we reinvestigate the systematic position of Pseudopodoces humilis using the chemical composition of uropygial gland secretions, which have previously been shown to be phylogenetically informative in birds, including Corvidae and Paridae. We found strong similarities in the fatty acid composition of uropygial gland secretions between Pseudopodoces humilis and parids, but clear differences from corvids. This result supports the parid affinites of Pseudopodoces, but stands in contrast to behavioural and vocal characteristics which are clearly more similar to corvids than to parids.

Keywords

Bird taxonomy Qinghai-Tibet-Plateau Uropygial gland secretion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the taxidermists of the Museum für Tierkunde Dresden for the extraction of the uropygial gland. The chemical analysis of the uropygial gland secretion was financially supported by the Research Fund of Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft. Our thanks go to Prof. Jochen Martens (Mainz) for valuable comments on the manuscript and to Marina Proutkina for help with the translation.

References

  1. Amadon D (1944) The genera of Corvidae and their relationships. Am Mus Novit 1251:1–21Google Scholar
  2. Bianki W (1907) Mongolii i vostochnago Tibeta. Aves expeditions P.K. Kozlowi po Mongoliam et Tibetiam orientalem :4–5Google Scholar
  3. Borecky SR (1978) Evidence for the removal of Pseudopodoces humilis from the Corvidae. Bull BOC 98:36–37Google Scholar
  4. Clench MH (1985) Body pterolysis of Atrichornis, Menura, the “corvid assamblage” and other possibly related passerines (Aves: Passeriformes). Rec Aust Mus 37:115–142Google Scholar
  5. Gebauer A, Kaiser M (1998) Zwerglaufhäher (Pseudopodoces humilis)—die Springbälle Tibets. J Orn 139:212Google Scholar
  6. Gebauer A, Kaiser M (2000) Der Zwerglaufhäher (Pseudopodoces humilis)—ein “Exot” vom Dach der Erde, Freilanduntersuchungen und Welterstzucht in Menschenobhut. Tagungsband XXI. Tag Trop Vögel Ges Tropenornithol :11–13Google Scholar
  7. Goodwin D (1986) Crows of the world, 2nd edn. British Museum (Nat Hist), LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartert E (1894) On little known and undescribed eggs from the Kuku-Noor. Novit Zool I:673Google Scholar
  9. Hartert E (1910) Die Vögel der paläarktischen Fauna,. vol I. Friedländer, Berlin, p 40Google Scholar
  10. Hartert E, Steinbacher F (1932) Die Vögel der paläarktischen Fauna, Ergänzungsband. Friedländer, Berlin, p 30Google Scholar
  11. Hope S (1989) Phylogeny of the avian family Corvidae. PhD dissertation. City University of New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Hume A (1871) Stray notes on ornithology in India. Ibis Ser 3,1:403–413Google Scholar
  13. Jacob J (1980) The pattern of uropygial gland secretions as a chemotaxonomic parameter in avian systematics. Acta Congr Int Ornithol 17(2):1221–1225Google Scholar
  14. Jacob J, Grimmer G (1973) Zusammensetzung der Bürzeldrüsensekrete der Dohle (Coloeus monedula), Raben- (Corvus corone corone) und Nebelkrähe (Corvus corone cornix). Z Naturforsch 28c:75–77Google Scholar
  15. Jacob J Hildebrandt A (1983) Chemische Verwandtschaft zwischen Zaunkönigen (Troglodytidae) und Meisen (Paridae). Funkt Biol Med 2:115–118Google Scholar
  16. Jacob J, Ziswiler V (1982) The uropygial gland. In: Farner DS, King SR, PARKS KC (eds) Avian biology, Vol VI. Academic Press, London, pp 199–323Google Scholar
  17. Jacob J, Balthazart J, Schoffeniels E (1979) Sex differences in the chemical composition of uropygial gland waxes in domestic ducks. Biochem Syst Ecol 7:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. James HF, Ericson PGP (2000) An overlooked species of tit in a novel adaptive zone for the Paridae. Joint Millenium Meeting of the AOU, BOU and SCO, Newfoundland, 14–19 August 2000Google Scholar
  19. James HF, Ericson PGP, Slikas B, Lei FM, Gill FB, Olson SL (2003) Pseudopodoces humilis, a misclassified terrestrial tit (Paridae) of the Tibetan Plateau: evolutionary consequences of shifting adaptive zones. Ibis 145:185–202Google Scholar
  20. Kleinschmidt O, Weigold H (1922) Corvidae, Certhiidae, Sittidae, Paridae, Cinclidae, in: Zoologische Ergebnisse der Walter Stötznerschen Expeditionen nach Szetschwan, Osttibet und Tschili auf Grund der Sammlungen und Beobachtungen Dr. Hugo Weigolds. Abh Ber Zool Anthropol-Ethnogr Mus Dresden XV, 3, 1:1–18Google Scholar
  21. Londei T (1998) Observations on Hume’s groundpecker Pseudopodoces humilis. Forktail 14:74–75Google Scholar
  22. Londei T (2002) Hume’s groundpecker Pseudopodoces humilis: the smallest corvid or the largest tit? Orient Bird Club Bull 36:52–53Google Scholar
  23. Ludlow F (1928) Birds of the Gyantse neighborhood, southern Tibet. Part II. Ibis Ser 12, 4:54–55Google Scholar
  24. Ludlow F, Kinnear N (1933) A contribution to the ornithology of Chinese Turkestan, Pt. 2. Ibis Ser 13, 3:445–449Google Scholar
  25. Madge S, Burn H (1994) Crows and jays. Black, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Meinertzhagen R (1926) Introduction to a review of the genus Corvus. Novit Zool 33:57–121Google Scholar
  27. Poltz J, Jacob J (1974a) Waxes of the uropygial gland secretion of birds of the genus Parus. Biochem Biophys Acta 360:348–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Poltz J, Jacob J (1974b) Die Bürzelsekrete von Eichelhäher (Garrulus glandarius), Elster (Pica pica), Alpendohle (Pyrrhocorax graculus) und Kolkrabe (Corvus corax). Z Naturforsch 29c:239–242Google Scholar
  29. Sharpe RB (1877) Catalogue of the birds in the British Museum, vol III. British Museum, London, p 152Google Scholar
  30. Vaurie C (1959) The birds of the Palearctic fauna. Passeriformes Witherby, London, p 156Google Scholar
  31. Wang G, Lei FM, Tang JY, Yi F (2003) Sexual and geographic phenotypic variation of the brown ground chough Pseudopodoces humilis in the Tibetan plateau, China. Acta Zootax Sinica 28:196–201Google Scholar
  32. Zarudny N, Loudon H (1902) Über die Einteilung des Genus Podoces in subgenera. Ornithol Mber 10:185Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V.  2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Axel Gebauer
    • 1
  • Jürgen Jacob
    • 2
  • Martin Kaiser
    • 3
  • Siegfried Eck
    • 4
  1. 1.Naturschutz-Tierpark GörlitzGörlitzGermany
  2. 2.HamburgGermany
  3. 3.Tierpark Berlin FriedrichsfeldeBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Staatliche Naturhistorische SammlungenTierkundemuseumDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations