A quantitative alternative to the Goutallier classification system using Lava Flex and Ideal MRI techniques: volumetric intramuscular fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle, a cadaveric study
- 63 Downloads
The Goutallier classification system is the most commonly used method for grading intramuscular fatty infiltration in rotator cuff tears. This grading system presents low inter-observer reliability and an inability to provide quantitative and repeatable outcomes for intramuscular fat. We determined the correlation and reliability of two methods, the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ MRI techniques, in quantifying volumetric intramuscular fat, while also comparing to the Goutallier method.
Materials and methods
The supraspinatus muscles of seventeen cadaveric shoulders were scanned using the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ MRI imaging protocols. Histological analysis was performed on the same muscles. Agreement, reliability, and correlation analyses were performed to compare all outcomes.
The Lava Flex protocol took an average of ~ 4 min, while the Ideal IQ required about ~ 11 min to complete. Bland–Altman analysis showed good agreement between the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ [LOA (− 0.10 and 0.05)], and ICC analyses showed excellent reliability (ICC (1,1) 0.948; ICC (2,1) 0.947). There was a 91% correlation between the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ MR protocols. Weighted Kappa analysis between histology and the Goutallier classification showed fair-to-moderate agreement.
The Lava Flex technique, taking about 30% of the acquisition time, may prevent motion artifacts in outcomes associated with the longer Ideal IQ technique. However, potential magnetic field inhomogeneities should be considered. The Lava Flex technique may be a faster and valid alternative to the Goutallier classification system.
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imaging Muscle properties Rotator cuff tear Fat infiltration Goutallier classification
The study was funded internally by the University of Texas at San Antonio and an award from the Mayo Clinic.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest that may have influenced or imparted bias on the work.
Cadaveric shoulders used in this study were obtained after institutional review board approval.
- 6.Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:78–83Google Scholar
- 9.Lippe J, Spang JT, Leger RR, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD, Shea KP (2012) Inter-rater agreement of the goutallier, patte, and warner classification scores using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy J Arthroscopic Relat Surg 28(2):154–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Post M, Silver R, Singh M (1983) Rotator cuff tear. Diagnosis and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:78–91Google Scholar
- 30.Horiuchi S, Nozaki T, Tasaki A, Yamakawa A, Kaneko Y, Hara T et al (2017) Reliability of MR quantification of rotator cuff muscle fatty degeneration using a 2-point dixon technique in comparison with the Goutallier classification: validation study by multiple readers. Acad Radiol 24(11):1343–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar