Monitoring the survival of islet transplants by MRI using a novel technique for their automated detection and quantification
- First Online:
There is a clinical need to be able to assess graft loss of transplanted pancreatic islets (PI) non-invasively with clear-cut quantification of islet survival. We tracked transplanted PI in diabetic mice during the early post-transplant period by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and quantified the islet loss using automatic segmentation technique.
Materials and methods
Magnetically labeled islet iso-, allo- and xenografts were injected into the right liver lobes. Animals underwent MRI scanning during 14 days after PI transplantation. MR images were processed using custom-made software, which automatically detects hypointense regions representing PI. It is based on morphological top-hat and bottom-hat transforms.
Manually and automatically detected areas, corresponding to PI, differed by 4% in phantoms. Signal loss regions due to PI decreased comparably in all groups during the first week post transplant. Throughout the second week post-transplant, the signal loss area continued in a steep decline in case of allografts and xenografts, whereas the decline in case of isografts slowed down.
Automatic segmentation allows for the more reproducible, objective assessment of transplanted PI. Quantification confirms the assumption that a significant number of islets are destroyed in the first week following transplantation irrespective of allografts, xenografts or isografts.
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Pancreatic islets (PI) Quantification Automatic segmentation Animal model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 10.Hsiao JK, Tai MF, Chu HH, Chen ST, Li H, Lai DM, Hsieh ST, Wang JL, Liu HM (2007) Magnetic nanoparticle labeling of mesenchymal stem cells without transfection agent: cellular behavior and capability of detection with clinical 1.5 T magnetic resonance at the single cell level. Magn Reson Med 58: 717–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Oweida AJ, Dunn EA, Karlik SJ, Dekaban GA, Foster PJ (2007) Iron-oxide labeling of hematogenous macrophages in a model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and the contribution to signal loss in fast imaging employing steady state acquisition (FIESTA) images. J Magn Reson Imaging 26: 144–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Barnett BP, Arepally A, Karmarkar PV, Qian D, Gilson WD, Walczak P, Howland V, Lawler L, Lauzon C, Stuber M, Kraitchman DL, Bulte JW (2007) Magnetic resonance-guided, real-time targeted delivery and imaging of magnetocapsules immunoprotecting pancreatic islet cells. Nat Med 13: 986–991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Russ JC (2006) The image processing handbook, 5th edn (Image Processing Handbook). CRC, USAGoogle Scholar
- 24.Gonzales RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL (2004) Digital image processing using Matlab. Pearson Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar