Advertisement

Evaluation of strength distribution at cut slope of decomposed granite with the use of sounding method and geophysical exploration method

  • Tatsuya UetaEmail author
  • Shin-Ichi Nishimura
  • Kazunari Imaide
  • Toshifumi Shibata
  • Takayuki Shuku
Article

Abstract

Natural slopes and cut slopes frequently collapse due to heavy rain and earthquakes, causing disasters. Countermeasures must be applied to mitigate such disasters. There is an especially high risk of a collapse at the surface layer of slopes, and thus, evaluating the strength distribution in the surface layer in detail is important to mitigating and preventing disasters. As simple investigation methods for these purposes, there are sounding methods and geophysical exploration methods. In the present study, dynamic cone penetration (DCP) is selected as the sounding method, and the surface wave method (SWM) is selected as the geophysical exploration method. The strength parameters are generally assumed based on standard penetration tests (SPTs), but DCP tests are simpler than SPTs and can be applied to narrow spaces. On the other hand, the SWM can be used to investigate wide spaces in a short time. We developed a synthesized approach to the geophysical exploration method and the sounding method. The two results obtained from the SWM and the DCP tests—namely the shear velocity and the DCP blow count, respectively—need to be converted to the standard penetration test blow count in order to be synthesized. An indicator simulation, one of the geostatistical methods, is employed to simulate the random field of N values by synthesizing the two results. The proposed procedure is applied to evaluate the strength of the weak surface layer of a cut slope composed of weathered granite, and its applicability for practical use is verified.

Keywords

Dynamic cone penetration test Surface wave method Conversion error Indicator simulation 

References

  1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control AC-19(6):716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) Geostatistical software library and user’s guide. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Fenton GA (1999) Random field modelling of CPT data. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 125(6):486–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Japanese Geotechnical Society, Maruzen (2018) Japanese geotechnical society standards-geotechnical and geoenvironmental investigation methods, vol 2Google Scholar
  5. Nishimura et al (2011) Prediction of spatial distribution for n-value in earth-fill embankments. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng 67(2):252–263Google Scholar
  6. Ortiz JM, Deutsch CV (2004) Indicator simulation accounting for multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 36(5):545–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sugiyama et al (1992) Spatial distribution characteristics of soil strength in embankment surface. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng 457/III-21:33–40Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatsuya Ueta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shin-Ichi Nishimura
    • 1
  • Kazunari Imaide
    • 1
  • Toshifumi Shibata
    • 1
  • Takayuki Shuku
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental and Life ScienceOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations