Advertisement

Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 109–123 | Cite as

Parameterization of canopy resistance for modeling the energy partitioning of a paddy rice field

  • Haofang Yan
  • Chuan Zhang
  • Oue Hiroki
Article

Abstract

Models for predicting hourly canopy resistance (r c) and latent heat flux (LET) based on the Penman–Monteith (PM) and bulk transfer methods are presented. The micrometeorological data and LET were observed during paddy rice-growing seasons in 2010 in Japan. One approach to model r c was using an aerodynamic resistance (r a) and climatic resistance (r *), while another one was based on a relationship with solar radiation (SR). Nonlinear relationships between r c and r *, and between r c and SR were found for different growing stages of the rice crop. The constructed r c models were integrated to the PM and bulk transfer methods and compared with measured LET using a Bowen ratio–energy balance method. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) were 155.2 and 170.5 W m−2 for the bulk transfer method with r c estimated using r * and with a function of SR, respectively, while the RMSEs were 87.4 and 85.7 W m−2 for the PM method with r c estimated using r * and SR, respectively. The r c integrated PM equation provided better performance than the bulk transfer equation. The results also revealed that neglecting the effect of r a on r c did not yield a significant difference in predicting LET.

Keywords

Climate resistance Bulk transfer method Canopy resistance Penman–Monteith model Meteorological data Bowen ratio–energy balance method Latent heat flux 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciate the careful and precise reviews by the anonymous reviewers and editors.

Funding

This study has been financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (51509107, 51609103); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu province (BK20140546, BK20150509); National key research and development program (2016YFC0400104); and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Authors’ contributions

Haofang Yan, first author, contributed to conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published. Chuan Zhang contributed to conception and design, acquisition of data, participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Oue Hiroki contributed to conception and design, acquisition of data and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

References

  1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves I, Pereira LS (2000) Modeling surface resistance from climatic variables? Agric Water Manag 42:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves L, Perrier A, Pereila LS (1998) Aerodynamic and surface resistances of complete cover crops: how good is the big leaf? Trans. ASAE 41(2):345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brutsaert W (1982) Evaporation in the atmosphere: theory, history, and application. D. Reidel, HighamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farahani HJ, Howell TA, Shuttleworth WJ, Bausch WC (2007) Evapotranspiration: progress in measurement and modeling in agriculture. Trans. ASAE 50:1627–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. He B et al (2009) Estimation of Hourly Evapotranspiration in arid region by a simple parameterization of canopy resistance. J Agric Meteorol 65(1):39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jarvis PJ (1976) The interception of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B273:593–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. (ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice 70) ASCE, Reston, VaGoogle Scholar
  9. Katerji N, Perrier A (1983) Mode´lisation de l’e´vapotranspiration re´elle d’une parcelle de luzerne: ro^le d’un coefficient cultural. Agronomie 3:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Katerji N, Rana G (2006) Modelling evapotranspiration of six irrigated crops under Mediterranean climate conditions. Agric For Meteorol 138:142–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Katerji N, Rana G (2008) Crop evapotranspiration measurements and estimation in the Mediterranean region. INRA-CRA, Bari, p 173Google Scholar
  12. Katerji N, Rana G, Fahed S (2011) Parameterizing canopy resistance using mechanistic and semi-empirical estimates of hourly evapotranspiration: critical evaluation for irrigated crops in the Mediterranean. Hydrol Process 25:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lagos LO, Martin DL, Verma SB, Irmak S, Irmak A, Eisenhauer D, Suyker A (2013) Surface energy balance model of transpiration from variable canopy cover and evaporation from residue-covered or bare soil systems: model evaluation. Irrig Sci 31:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li S et al (2014) A coupled surface resistance model to estimate crop evapotranspiration in arid region of northwest China. Hydrol Process 28:2312–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li S et al (2015) Comparison of several surface resistance models for estimating crop evapotranspiration over the entire growing season in arid regions. Agric For Meteorol 208:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luo Y et al (2012) Urban weather data to estimate reference evapotranspiration for rural irrigation management. J Irrig Drain Eng 138(9):837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and atmosphere. The state and movement of water in living organisms. Symp Soc Exp Biol 19:205–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Monteith JL (1973) Principles of environmental physics. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Ortega-Farias S, Olioso A, Antonioletti R, Brisson N (2004) Evaluation of the Penman–Monteith model for estimating soybean evapotranspiration. Irrig Sci 23:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oue H (2005) Influences of meteorological and vegetational factors on the partitioning of the energy of a rice paddy field. Hydrol Process 19(8):1567–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pauwels VRN, Samson R (2006) Comparison of different methods to measure and model actual evapotranspiration rates for a wet sloping grassland. Agric Water Manag 82:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perez PJ, Lecina S, Castellvi F, Martinez-Cob A, Villalobos FJ (2006) A simple parameterization of bulk canopy resistance from climatic variables for estimating hourly evapotranspiration. Hydrol Process 20:515–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rana G, Katerji N (1998) A measurement based sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration model for crops of different height and in contrasting water status. Theor Appl Climatol 60:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rana G, Katerji N (2008) Direct and indirect methods to simulate the actual evapotranspiration of an irrigated overhead table grape vineyard under Mediterranean conditions. Hydrol Process 22:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rana G, Katerji N, Mastrorilli M, EI Moujabber M (1994) Evapotranspiration and canopy resistance of grass in a Mediterranean region. Theor Appl Climatol 50:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rana G, Katerji N, Mastorilli M, EI Moujabber M, Brisson N (1997) Validation of a model of actual evapotranspiration for water stresses soybeans. Agric For Meteorol 86:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rana G, Katerji N, Ferrara RM, Martinelli N (2011) An operational model to estimate hourly and daily crop evapotranspiration in hilly terrain: validation on wheat and oat crops. Theor Appl Climatol 103:413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shi T, Guan D, Wang A, Wu J, Jin C, Han S (2008) Comparison of three models to estimate evapotranspiration for a temperate mixed forest. Hydrol Process 22(17):3431–3443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steduto P, Todorovic M, Caliandro A, Rubino P (2003) Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by the Penman-Monteith equation in southern Italy. Constant vs. variable canopy resistance. Theor Appl Climatol 74:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Todorovic M (1999) Single-layer evapotranspiration model with variable canopy resistance. J Irrig Drain Eng 125(5):235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wight JR, Hanson CL, Wright JL (1993) Comparing Bowen ratio-energy balance systems for measuring ET. In: Allen RG, Van Bavel CMU (eds) Management of irrigation and drainage systems, integrated perspectives. Am Soc Civ Eng, New York, pp 953–960Google Scholar
  32. Yan H, Oue H (2011) Application of the two-layer model for predicting transpiration from the rice canopy and water surface evaporation beneath the canopy. J Agric Meteorol 67(3):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yan H, Shi H, Xue Z, Zhang Y, Liu H (2008) Comparison of estimating ET 0 with different methods in Hetao Irrigation district in Inner Mongolia. J Trans CSAE 24(2):103–106 (in Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  34. Yan H, Oue H, Zhang C (2012a) Predicting water surface evaporation in the paddy field by solving energy balance equation beneath the rice canopy. Paddy Water Environ 10(2):121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yan H, Zhang C, Oue H, Sugimoto H (2012b) Comparison of different methods for estimating soil surface evaporation in a bare field. Meteorol Atmos Phys 118(3–4):143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yan H, Zhang C, Oue H et al (2015a) Study of evapotranspiration and evaporation beneath the canopy in a buckwheat field. Theor Appl Climatol 122:721–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yan H, Shi H, Oue H, Zhang C, Xue Z, Cai B, Wang G (2015b) Modeling bulk canopy resistance from climatic variables for predicting hourly evapotranspiration of maize and buckwheat. Meteorol Atmos Phys 127(3):305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang Y, Cui Y, Luo Y, Lyu X, Traore S, Khan S, Wang W (2016) Short-term forecasting of daily reference evapotranspiration using the Penman–Monteith model and public weather forecasts. Agric Water Manag 177:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering and Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and TechnologyJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina
  2. 2.Department of Water ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
  3. 3.Institute of Agricultural EngineeringJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina
  4. 4.United Graduate School of Agricultural SciencesEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations