Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 931–941 | Cite as

Comparative energy and economic analyses of conventional and System of Rice Intensification (SRI) methods of rice production in Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam

  • Tuyet Thi Anh Truong
  • John Fry
  • Phu Van Hoang
  • Hoang Huy Ha


The consumption of energy inputs in agricultural production has been increasing rapidly during the past decades. However, given the limitations and costs of non-renewable energy, increasing production while using the least energy possible has become a major concern of most nations. Prompted by this concern, we conducted a face-to-face survey of 90 farming households in Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam, to find out how energy is being used in agriculture and, specifically, in their rice production. Through analysis of energy input–output balances, combined with economic efficiency analysis, a comparison was made of conventional and SRI methods of rice production. The study found that applying the SRI method can save around 23% of energy inputs, while increasing energy outputs by 11%. Economic benefits per hectare also rise by more than 8 million dong (USD 364) compared to those under the conventional cultivation system. The study also showed conflicts between the energy and economic balances for manual compared with machine ploughing operations. This study contributes to providing an overview of energy consumption in rice cultivation at the household level. Its findings can help stakeholders to assess current policies and make better decisions on the uses of energy in agricultural production. In addition, the comprehensive approach taken here to analysing energy use and efficiency could expand the analysis and comparison of energy uses at sectoral or activity level—still a new field in Vietnam and many other countries.


Rice production SRI Economic analysis Energy efficiency Energy productivity Vietnam 


  1. Africare, Oxfam America, WWF-ICRISAT Project (2010). More Rice for People, More Water for the Planet. WWF-ICRISAT Project, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. AEWG (2009) Peer review on energy efficiency in Vietnam. Final Report. In: The 38th APEC Energy Working Group Meeting, Bali, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Alam MS, Alam MR, Islam KK (2005) Energy flow in agriculture: Bangladesh. Am J Environ Sci 1(3):213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bockari-Gevao SM, Wan Ishak bin WI, Yahya A, Wan CC (2005) Analysis of energy consumption in lowland rice-based cropping system of Malaysia. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 27(4):820–826Google Scholar
  5. Castillo GE, Minh NL, Pfeifer K (2012) Learning from the system of rice intensification in North Vietnam. Series on scaling up in agriculture, rural development and nutrition, Brief 15, June. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Cherati FE, Bahrami H, Asakereh A (2011). Energy survey of mechanized and traditional rice production system in Mazandaran Province of Iran. Afr J Agric Res 6 (11):2565–2570.
  7. Dialsingh I (2008) Face-to-face interviewing. In: Lavrakas P (ed) Encyclopedia of survey research methods. SAGE Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, pp 260–262. doi: 10.4135/9781412963947.n174 Google Scholar
  8. Do TM, Sharma D (2011) Viewpoint Vietnam’s energy sector: a review of current energy policies and strategies. Energy Policy 39:5770–5777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dzung NT (2010) SRI Viet Nam: The updated report on the Development of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Vietnamto Oxfam America, 2010Google Scholar
  10. Fluck RC (1992) Energy analysis for agricultural systems: energy in farm production. In: Fluck RC (ed) Energy in world agriculture, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 45–53Google Scholar
  11. Fluck RC, Baird CD (1980) Agricultural energetics. Avi Publishing Company, WestportGoogle Scholar
  12. Gorman T (2008) SRI in Vietnam: an update. Oxfam, Plant Protection Department/MARD, and the Centre for Sustainable Rural Development, HanoiGoogle Scholar
  13. Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (2011) Decree No. 21/2011/ND-CP detailing the Law on Economical and Efficient Use of Energy and measures for its implementationGoogle Scholar
  14. GSO (2009) The 2009 Vietnam population and housing census: completed results. General Statistical Office, Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi, VietnamGoogle Scholar
  15. GSO (2010) Statistical handbook of Vietnam. General Statistical Office, Statistical Publishing House, HanoiGoogle Scholar
  16. Heichel GH (1980) Assessing the fossil energy costs of propagating agricultural crops. In: Pimentel D (ed) Handbook of energy utilization in agriculture. CRC Press. Inc., Boca Raton, pp 27–34Google Scholar
  17. Helsel ZR (1992) Energy and alternatives for fertilizer and pesticide use. In: Fluck RC (ed) Energy in world agriculture, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 177–201Google Scholar
  18. Hoang VP (2005) Results of study on the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Thai Nguyen and Bac Giang Provinces in spring rice crop of year 2005. Sci Technol J Thai Nguyen Univ, vol 35, No.3/2005Google Scholar
  19. Hoang VP (2012) Study on application of the system of rice intensification (SRI) on rainfed land in Vo Nhai District, Thai Nguyen Province. Sci J Agric Rural Dev, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. No.10/2012Google Scholar
  20. Hoang VP, Vu TD (2006) The prospectives of application of system of rice intensification (SRI) in rice production in the Northern Midlands and mountainous areas of Vietnam. In: Proceedings of the national science conference on research and technology development to serve the development of agriculture and rural development of the northern mountainous area, years of 2000–2005, March 2006Google Scholar
  21. IRRI (2010) IRRI World Rice Statistics (WRS). International Rice Research Institute: Philippines. Accessed 22 Nov 2011
  22. Khan MA, Khan S, Mushtag S (2009) Energy and economic efficiency analysis of rice and cotton production in China. Sahad J Agric 25(2):291–300Google Scholar
  23. Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2008) Growing more rice with less water in Asia: identifying and exploring opportunities through system of rice intensification. Agricultural Systems and Engineering Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand. [might cite instead their article in EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE]Google Scholar
  24. Moradi M, Azapour E (2011) Study of energy indices for native and breed rice varieties production in Iran. World Appl Sci J 13(1):137–141Google Scholar
  25. NA (2010) Energy efficiency and savings Law No. 50/2010/QH12 approved by the 12th National Assembly on 28/06/2010Google Scholar
  26. Nguyen HN, Hoang VP (2005) The study on the system of rice intensification (SRI) in Thai Nguyen province in spring rice crop of year 2004. Sci J Agric Rural Dev, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, vol. 53, No. 3 + 4/2005Google Scholar
  27. Namdari M, Kangarshahi AA, Amiri NA (2011) Econometric model estimation and sensitivity analysis of inputs for mandarin production in Mazandaran Province of Iran. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 3(5):464–470Google Scholar
  28. Nguyen TA (1997) Energy and environmental issues in Vietnam. Nat Resour Forum 21(3):201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ortiz-Canãvate J, Hernanz JL (1999) Energy for biological systems. In: Kitani O (ed) CIGR handbook of agricultural engineering, volume 5—energy and biomass engineering. ASAE Publication, Washington, pp 13–23Google Scholar
  30. Ozkan Burhan, Akcaoz Handan, Fert Cemal (2004) Energy input–output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renew Energy 29:39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. PM (2003). Decree No.102/2003/ND-CP on Thrifty and Efficiency Use of Energy. Prime Minister: Hanoi, September, 2003Google Scholar
  32. PM (2006) The National Energy Efficiency Program for the period 2006–2015. Prime Minister’s Decision No. 79/2006/QD-TTg: Hanoi, April 2006Google Scholar
  33. PM (2014) Approval of the National Action Plan on Green growth in Vietnam. Prime Minister’s Decision No. 403/2014/QD-TTg: Hanoi, March 2014Google Scholar
  34. United Nations Vietnam (2011) Climate change fact sheet: greenhouse gas emissions and options for mitigation in Vietnam, and the UN’s responses: version of 11 April, 2011. United Nations, VietnamGoogle Scholar
  35. Uphoff N (2006) Report on visit to Vietnam to review SRI progress—January 3–15, 2006. CIIFAD (Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development), USAGoogle Scholar
  36. Yaldiz O, Ozturk HH, Zeren Y, Bascetomcelik A (1993) Energy usage in production of field crops in Turkey. In: 5th international congress on mechanization and energy use in agriculture, 11–14 October, 1993, Kusadasi, TurkeyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering and Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuyet Thi Anh Truong
    • 1
  • John Fry
    • 2
  • Phu Van Hoang
    • 1
  • Hoang Huy Ha
    • 1
  1. 1.Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and ForestryThai NguyenVietnam
  2. 2.University College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations