Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 745–760 | Cite as

Agronomic fortification of rice grains with secondary and micronutrients under differing crop management and soil moisture regimes in the north Indian Plains

  • Anchal Dass
  • Subhash Chandra
  • Norman Uphoff
  • Anil K. Choudhary
  • Ranjan Bhattacharyya
  • K. S. Rana


Although the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) has been reported to produce higher paddy (Oryza sativa L.) yields with better-quality grains, little research has addressed the latter claim. This study investigated the interactive effects of rice cultivation methods with different irrigation schedules and plant density on the uptake and concentration of sulfur (S), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn) and copper (Cu) in the grain and straw of two rice cultivars during two rainy seasons in the northern plains of India. As the two seasons differed in amounts of rainfall, there were impacts of soil moisture differences on nutrient uptake. Plots with SRI cultivation methods enhanced the grain uptake and concentrations of S, Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu by 36, 32, 28, 32 and 63%, respectively, compared to conventional transplanting (CT). Under SRI management, the highest concentrations of S, Zn and Cu in the grain and straw occurred with irrigation intervals scheduled at 3 days after disappearance of ponded water (DADPW; 3D), whereas Fe and Mn concentrations in the grain and straw were higher with irrigation at 1 DADPW (1 D ) compared with plots under 3 D or 5 DADPW (5 D ). The higher nutrient uptakes were also manifested in higher grain yield in 1 D and 3 D plots (by 9 and 6%, respectively) compared with 5 D . Wider spacing (25 × 25 cm) compared with closer spacing (20 × 20 cm) significantly increased yield and the uptake and concentrations of all the said nutrients in the grains. When comparing the performance of two cultivars, the total uptakes of Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu in both grain and straw were significantly more in Hybrid 6444 than the improved variety Pant Dhan 4. Overall, SRI crop management compared to CT practices led to more biological fortification of rice grains with respect to S and the four micronutrients studied, giving a concomitant yield advantage of about 17% on average in this region.


Nutrient uptake Irrigation Spacing System of rice intensification Cultivars 



Authors extend their sincere gratitude to the All India Coordinated Research Project on Water Management for providing financial and technical support. Authors gratefully acknowledge both anonymous reviewers of the article for their valuable suggestions in improving the manuscript.


  1. Adak A, Prasanna R, Babu S, Bidyarani N, Verma S, Pal M, Shivay YS, Nain L (2016) Micronutrient enrichment mediated by plant-microbe interactions and rice cultivation practices. J Plant Nutr. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1148723 Google Scholar
  2. Barison J (2003) Nutrient-use efficiency and nutrient uptake in conventional and intensive (SRI) rice cultivation systems in Madagascar. MS thesis, Cornell University.
  3. Barison J, Uphoff N (2011) Rice yield and its relation to root growth and nutrient-use efficiency under SRI and conventional cultivation: an evaluation in Madagascar. Paddy Water Environ 9:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertin C, Yang XH, Weston LA (2003) The role of root exudates and allelo-chemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 256:67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biswas H, Rattan RK, Singh AK (2007) Transformation of micronutrients as influenced by tillage, water and integrated nutrient management under rice–wheat cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci 77:600–603Google Scholar
  6. Black CA (1971) Methods of soil analysis, part II. American Society of Agronomy, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  7. Buscot F, Varma A (2005) Microorganisms in soils: roles in genesis and functions. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  8. Caulfield LE, Black RE (2004) Zinc deficiency. In: Erzal M, Lopez AD, Murray CJ (eds) A rodgers comparative quantification of health risks. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 257–279Google Scholar
  9. Dass A, Chandra S (2013) Irrigation, spacing and cultivar effects on net photosynthetic rate, dry matter partitioning and productivity of rice under SRI in Mollisols of northern India. Exp Agric 49(4):504–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dass A, Kaur R, Choudhary AK, Pooniya V, Rana DS, Raj R, Rana KS (2015) System of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification for higher productivity and resource-use efficiency: a review. Indian J Agron 60:1–19Google Scholar
  11. Dass A, Chandra S, Choudhary AK, Singh G, Sudhishri S (2016a) Influence of field re-ponding pattern and plant spacing on rice root-shoot characteristics, yield, and water productivity of two modern cultivars under SRI management in Indian Mollisols. Paddy Water Environ 14:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dass A, Shekhawat K, Choudhary AK, Sepat S, Rathore SS, Mahajan G, Chauhan BS (2016b) Weed management in rice using crop-competition. Crop Prot. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.005 Google Scholar
  13. Dutta D, Mandal B, Mandal LN (1989) Decrease in availability of zinc and copper in acidic to near neutral soils on submergence. Soil Sci 147:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FAO (2014) The state of food insecurity in the world—strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. FAO (2016) Save and grow: maize, rice and wheat–a guide to sustainable crop production. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  16. Forno DA, Yoshida S, Asher CJ (1975) Zinc deficiency in rice I. Soil factors associated with the deficiency. Plant Soil 42:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao XP, Zou CQ, Fan X, Zhang FS, Hoffland E (2006) From flooded to aerobic conditions in rice cultivation: consequences for zinc uptake. Plant Soil 280:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gopalakrishnan S, Kumar MR, Humayun P, Srinivas V, Kumari RB, Vijaybharati R, Singh A, Surekha K, Padmavathi Ch, Somasekhar N, Reddy RP, Latha PC, Rao SLV, Babu VR, Viraktamath BC, Goud VV, Loganandhan N, Gujja B, Rupela O (2013) Assessment of different methods of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation affecting growth parameters, soil chemical, biological and microbiological properties, water saving, and grain yield in rice-rice system. Paddy Water Environ 12:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harmsen K, Vlek PLG (1985) The chemistry of micronutrients in soil. Fertilizer Research, 7:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Havlin JL, Tisdale SL, Beaton JD, Nelson WL (2007) Soil fertility and fertilizers. Pearson Education and Dorling Kindersley Publishing, Delhi, p 515pGoogle Scholar
  21. Hazra KK, Chandra S (2014) Mild to prolonged stress increased rice tillering and source-to-sink nutrient translocation under SRI management. Paddy Water Environ 12:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoseinzade H, Ardakani MR, Shahdi A, Rahmani HA, Noormohammadi G, Miransari M (2015) Rice (Oryza sativa L.) nutrient management using mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic Herbaspirillum seropedicae. J Integr Agric doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61241-2
  23. Husson O (2013) Redox potential (Eh) and pH as drivers of soil/plant/microorganism systems: a transdisciplinary overview pointing to integrative opportunities for agronomy. Plant Soil 362:389–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Inceoglu O, Al-Abu Soud W, Salles JF, Semenov AV, Van Elsas JD (2011) Comparative analysis of bacterial communities in a potato field as determined by pyro-sequencing. PLoS ONE 6:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Islam A, Islam W (1973) Chemistry of submerged soils and growth and yield of rice. Plant Soil 39:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Iu KL, Pulford ID, Duncan HJ (1981) Influence of water-logging and lime or organic matter additions on the distribution of trace metals in an acid soil. Plant Soil 59:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Delhi, p 498pGoogle Scholar
  28. Karan AK, Kar S, Singh VK (2013) Effects of liming, soil-moisture regimes, application of sulfur and some micronutrients on nutrients availability in soil-plant system and yield of rice in acid alluvial soil. Int J Plant Soil Sci 3:1453–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin XQ, Zhou WJ, Zhu DF, Chen HZ, Zhang YP (2006) Nitrogen accumulation, remobilization and partitioning in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under an improved irrigation practice. Field Crops Res 96:448–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manzoni S, Taylor P, Richter A, Porporato A, Agren GI (2012) Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytol 196:79–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Marschner H, Romheld V, Cakmak I (1987) Root-induced changes in nutrient availability in the rhizosphere. J Plant Nutr 10:1175–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McBeath TM, Mc Laughlin MJ, Kirby JK, Armstrong RD (2012) Dry soil reduces fertilizer phosphorus and zinc diffusion but not bioavailability. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:1301–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mengel K, Kirkby EA (1996) Principles of plant nutrition. Panima Publishing, New Delhi, p 686pGoogle Scholar
  35. Micallef SA, Shiaris MP, Colon-Carmona A (2009) Influence of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions on rhizobacterial communities and natural variation in root exudates. J Exp Bot 60:1729–1742CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Obermueller AJ, Mikkelsen DS (1974) Effect of water management and soil aggregation on the growth and nutrient uptake of rice. Agron J 66:627–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ 939:19Google Scholar
  38. Or D, Smets BF, Wraith JM, Dechesne A, Friedman SP (2007) Physical constraints affecting bacterial habitats and activity in unsaturated porous media: a review. Adv Water Resour 30:1505–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paul S, Ali N, Sarkar SN, Datta SK, Datta K (2013) Loading and bioavailability of iron in cereal grains. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 113:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ponnamperuma FN (1972) The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv Agron 24:29–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prakash A, Rao J, Singh ON, Tyagi JP, Singh S, Rath PC (2007) Rice: the queen of cereals. AZRA, Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, p 202Google Scholar
  42. Prasad R, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Sharma SN (2006) Learning by doing exercise in soil fertility: a practical manual for soil fertility. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  43. Prasanna R, Joshi R, Rana A, Shivay YS, Nain L (2012) Influence of co-inoculation of bacteria-cyanobacteria on crop yield and C–N sequestration in soil under rice crop. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1223–1235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Prasanna R, Chaudhary V, Gupta V, Babu S, Kumar A, Shivay YS, Nain L (2013) Cyanobacteria mediated plant growth promotion and bioprotection against Fusarium wilt in tomato. Eur J Plant Pathol 136:337–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rangaswamy R (2006) A text book of agricultural statistics. New Age, New Delhi, p 496pGoogle Scholar
  46. Römheld V, Neumann G (2006) The rhizosphere: contributions of the soil–root interface to sustainable soil systems. In: Uphoff N et al (eds) Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saharan BS, Nehra V (2011) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sci Med Res.
  48. Saleh J, Najafi N, Oustan S, Aliasgharzad N, Ghassemi-Golezani K (2013) Effects of silicon, salinity and water-logging on the extractable Zn, Cu, K, and Na in a sandy loam soil. Int J Agric Res Rev 3:56–64Google Scholar
  49. Santiago AD, Quintero JM, Avilés M, Delgado A (2011) Effect of Trichoderma asperellum strain T34 and glucose addition on iron, copper, manganese, and zinc uptake by wheat grown on calcareous medium. Plant Soil 342:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sarwar MJ, Khanif YM (2005) The effect of different water levels on rice yield and Cu and Zn concentration. J Agron 4:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Savithri P, Permal R, Nagarajan R (1999) Soil and crop management technologies for enhancing rice production under micronutrient constraints. In: Balasubramanian V et al (eds) Resource management in rice systems: nutrients. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharma A, Patni B, Shankdhar D, Shankdhar SC (2013) Zn: an indispensable micro-nutrient. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 19:11–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Solaiman MZ, Hirata H (1997) Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation of rice seedlings at the nursery stage upon performance in the paddy field and greenhouse. Plant Soil 191:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stoop WA (2011) The scientific case for system of rice intensification and its relevance for sustainable crop intensification. Intl J Agric Sustain 9(3):443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Subbaiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci 25:259–262Google Scholar
  56. Taniguchi F, Morishita E, Sekiya A, Yamaguchi D, Nomoto H, Kobayashi E, Takata M, Kosugi I, Takeuchi N, Asakura H, Ohtake S (2015) Late onset thrombosis in two Japanese patients with compound heterozygote protein S deficiency. Thromb Res 135(6):1221–1223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Thakur AK, Uphoff N, Antony E (2010) An assessment of physiological effects of system of rice intensification (SRI) practices compared with recommended rice cultivation practices in India. Exp Agric 46:77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thakur AK, Rath S, Mandal KG (2013) Differential responses of system of rice intensification (SRI) and conventional flooded-rice management methods to applications of nitrogen fertilizer. Plant Soil 370:59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Trijatmiko KR, Dueñas C, Tsakirpaloglo N, Torrizo L, Arines FM, Adeva C, Balindong J, Oliva N, Sapasap MV, Borrero J, Rey J, Francisco P, Nakanishi NAH, Lombi E, Tako E, Glahn RP, Stangoulis J, Mohanty PC, Johnson AAT, Tohme J, Barry G, Slamet-Loedin IH (2016) Biofortified Indica rice attains iron and zinc nutrition dietary targets in the field. Sci Rep 6:19792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner TR, James EK, Poole PS (2013) The plant microbiome. Genome Biol 14:209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Uphoff N (2015) The system of rice intensification: responses to frequently asked questions.
  62. Vijayakumar M, Ramesh S, Chandrasekaran B, Thiyagarajan TM (2006) Effect of system of rice intensification (SRI) practices on yield attributes and yield and water productivity of rice (Oryza sativa). Res J Agric Biol Sci 2:236–247Google Scholar
  63. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. WHO (2016) World Health Organisation.\topics/ida/en/. Accessed 9 Sept 2016
  65. Williams CH, Steinberg A (1959) Soil sulphur fractions as chemical indices of available sulphur in some Australian Soils. Aust J Agric Res 10:340–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wu W, Uphoff N (2015) A review of the system of rice intensification in China. Plant Soil 393:361–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xu JZ, Lv YP, Yang SH, Wei Q, Qiao ZF (2015) Water-saving irrigation improves the solubility and bioavailability of zinc in rice paddy. Int J Agric Biol 17:1001–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhao LM, Wu LH, Li YS, Lu XH, Zhu DF, Uphoff N (2009) Influence of the system of rice intensification on rice yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency with different N application rates. Exp Agric 45:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering and Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anchal Dass
    • 1
  • Subhash Chandra
    • 2
  • Norman Uphoff
    • 3
  • Anil K. Choudhary
    • 1
  • Ranjan Bhattacharyya
    • 1
  • K. S. Rana
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.G.B.Pant University of Agriculture and TechnologyPantnagarIndia
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations