Advertisement

Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 43–50 | Cite as

Effect of slag-type fertilizers on N2O flux from komatsuna vegetated soil and CH4 flux from paddy vegetated soil

  • Ankit Singla
  • Kazuyuki Inubushi
Article

Abstract

Slag-type fertilizer, which is a byproduct of the steel industry, contains high amount of active iron oxide and silica. This byproduct acts as an oxidizing agent in the agricultural soils and may have positive impact on the soil properties and plant growth. It can suppress CH4 emission, while may also affect N2O emission. A pot experiment with komatsuna and a microcosm experiment with rice were conducted to determine the effect of slag-type fertilizers (Agripower and Minekaru) on N2O and CH4 flux, respectively. The application rate of silica was kept similar for both fertilizers which caused four times higher iron application in Minekaru treatment compared to Agripower treatment. The observation results revealed that the Agripower and Minekaru treatment emitted more N2O only in the initial stage of the experiment compared to the control soil. The cumulative N2O emission over 59 days of the experiment was not significantly different between the various treatments. Minekaru-treated soil significantly decreased seasonal and cumulative CH4 flux over 112 days of the experiment compared to Agripower and control soil, while Agripower did not affect compared to the control. It was possibly due to higher iron application in Minekaru treatment than Agripower treatment. The application of Agripower and Minekaru increased shoot weight, panicle numbers, and weight of panicles in paddy. This study suggests that the application of slag-type fertilizers neither affect cumulative N2O emission nor plant biomass in komatsuna. The application of Minekaru significantly decreased CH4 evolution; while Agripower and Minekaru increased plant biomass in paddy vegetated soil.

Keywords

Slag-type fertilizers Chemical fertilizer Komatsuna Paddy N2CH4 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Slag-type fertilizers were provided by Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation, Japan. This research study was also financially supported by Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation, Japan. The first author is also thankful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali MA, Lee CH, Kim PJ (2008) Effect of silicate fertilizer on reducing methane emission during rice cultivation. Biol Fertil Soils 44:597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amkha S, Sakamoto A, Tachibana M, Inubushi K (2009) Controlled mineralizing acetaldehyde condensation urea (CM-CDU) fertilizer can reduce nitrate leaching and N2O emission from an Andisol with continuous cropped komatsuna (Brassica napa L.). Soil Sci Plant Nutr 55:772–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1989) Colorimetric determination of ammonium. In: a handbook of methods (ISSS ed) Trop Soil Biol Fertil. CAB International, Walingford, pp 42-43Google Scholar
  4. Bodegom VP, Stams F, Boeke LM, Leffelaar P (2001) Methane oxidation and the consumption for oxygen in the rice rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3586–3597PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai Z, Xing G, Yan X, Xu H, Tsuruta H, Yagi K, Minami K (1997) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy fields as affected by nitrogen fertilisers and water management. Plant Soil 196:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cannavo P, Richaume A, Lafolie F (2004) Fate of nitrogen and carbon in the vadose zone: in situ and laboratory measurements of seasonal variations in aerobic respiratory and denitrifying activities. Soil Biol Biochem 36:463–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carole RS, Scarigelli FP (1971) Colorimetric determination of nitrate after hydrazine reduction to nitrite. Microchem J 16:657–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conrad R (2002) Control of microbial methane production in wetland rice fields. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 64:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conrad R, Arthl S (1996) Microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2 CO., CH4, N2O and NO). Microbiol Rev 60:609–640PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ebid A, Ueno H, Ghoneim A, Asagi N (2008) Uptake of carbon and nitrogen derived from carbon-13 and nitrogen-15 dual-labeled maize residue compost applied to radish, komatsuna, and chingensai for three consecutive croppings. Plant Soil 304:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO (2002) FAO/UNESCO Digital Soil Map of the World and derived soil properties. In: Land and water digital media series, Rev 1. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Furukawa Y, Inubushi K (2002) Feasible suppression technique of methane emission from paddy soil by iron amendment. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 64:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furukawa Y, Inubushi K (2004) Evaluation of slag application to decrease methane emission from paddy soil and fate of iron. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50:1029–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanson RS (1980) Ecology and diversity of methylotrophic organisms. Adv Appl Microbiol 26:13–40Google Scholar
  15. Hayakawa A, Akiyama H, Sudo S, Yagi K (2009) N2O and NO emissions from an Andisol field as influenced by pelleted poultry manure. Soil Biol Biochem 41:521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henckel T, Roslev P, Conrad R (2000) Effects of O2 and CH4 on presence and activity of the indigenous methanotrophic community in rice field soil. Environ Microbiol 2:666–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoon Lee C, Kim SY, Villamil MB, Pramanik P, Hong CO, Kim PJ (2012) Different response of silicate fertilizer having electron acceptors on methane emission in rice paddy soil under green manuring. Biol Fertil Soils 48:435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang B, Yu K, Gambrell RP (2009) Effects of ferric iron reduction and regeneration on nitrous oxide and methane emissions in a rice soil. Chemosphere 74:481–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Husin YA, Khalil MAK, Shearer MJ (1995) Methane flux from Indonesian wetland rice: the effects of water management and rice variety. Chemosphere 31:3153–3180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inubushi K, Hori K, Matsumoto S, Umebayashi M, Wada H (1989) Methane emission from the flooded paddy soils to the atmosphere through rice plant. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 60:318–324Google Scholar
  21. Inubushi K, Naganuma H, Kitahara S (1996) Contribution of denitrification and autotrophic and heterotrophic nitrification to nitrous oxide production in andosols. Biol Fertil Soils 23:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inubushi K, Barahona MA, Yamakawa K (1999) Effects of salts and moisture content on N2O emission and nitrogen dynamics in Yellow soil and Andosol in model experiments. Biol Fertil Soils 29:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Climate change 2007, the physical science basis, contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackel U, Schnell S (2000) Suppression of methane emission from rice paddies by ferric iron fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1811–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackel U, Russo S, Schnell S (2005) Enhanced iron reduction by iron supplement: a strategy to reduce methane emission from paddies. Soil Biol Biochem 37:2150–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jin X, Gruber N (2003) Offsetting the radiative benefit of ocean iron fertilization by enhancing N2O emissions. Geophys Res Lett 30:31–34Google Scholar
  27. Lee YB, Lee CH, Hawng JY, Lee IB, Kim PJ (2004) Enhancement of phosphate desorption by silicate in soils with salt accumulation. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50:493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma JF, Nishimura K, Takahashi E (1989) Effect of silicon on the growth of rice plant at different growth stages. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 35:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mer JL, Roger P (2001) Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur J Soil Biol 37:25–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Minami K (1994) Methane from rice production. Fertil Res 37:167–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mosier A, Schimel D, Valentine D, Bronson K, Parton W (1991) Methane and nitrous oxide flux in native, fertilized and cultivated grassland. Nature 350:330–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muller C, Stevens RJ, Laughlin RJ, Jager HJ (2004) Microbial processes and the site of N2O production in a temperate grassland soil. Soil Biol Biochem 36:453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neue HU, Roger PA (1993) Rice agriculture: factors affecting methane emissions. In: Khalil MAK (ed) Atmospheric methane: sources, sinks and role in global change. Springer, Berlin, pp 254–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peters GP, Andrew RA, Boden T, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Quéré CL, Marland G, Raupach MR, Wilson C (2013) The challenge to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nat Clim Change 3:4–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW (2009) Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 326:123–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shariatmadari H, Mermut AR (1999) Magnesium and silicon induced phosphate in smectite, palygorskite, and sepiolite–calcite systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1167–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh JS, Singh S (1995) Methanogenic bacteria, methanogenesis and methane emission from rice paddies. Trop Ecol 36:145–165Google Scholar
  38. Singla A, Inubushi K (2013) CO2, CH4 and N2O production potential of paddy soil after biogas byproducts application under waterlogged condition. Int J Agri Environ Biotechnol 6:233–239Google Scholar
  39. Singla A, Inubushi K (2014) Effect of biochar on CH4 and N2O emission from soils vegetated with paddy. Paddy Water Environ. doi: 10.1007/s10333-013-0357-3 Google Scholar
  40. Singla A, Dubey SK, Iwasa H, Inubushi K (2013) Nitrous oxide flux from Komatsuna (Brassica rapa) vegetated soil: a comparison between biogas digested liquid and chemical fertilizer. Biol Fertil Soils 49:971–976Google Scholar
  41. Takahashi E, Ma JF, Miyake Y (1990) The possibility of silicon as an essential element for higher plants. Comments Agric Food Chem 2:99–122Google Scholar
  42. Watanabe A, Takeda T, Kimura M (1999) Evaluation of origins of CH4 carbon emitted from rice paddies. J Geophys Res 104:623–629Google Scholar
  43. Yagi K, Minami K (1990) Effect of organic matter application on methane emission from some Japanese paddy fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering and Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bioresource Science, Graduate School of HorticultureChiba UniversityMatsudoJapan

Personalised recommendations