Advertisement

Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 251–261 | Cite as

The SRI (system of rice intensification) water management evaluation by SWAPP (SWAT–APEX Program) modeling in an agricultural watershed of South Korea

  • Chung-Gil Jung
  • Jong-Yoon Park
  • Seong-Joon Kim
  • Geun-Ae Park
Technical Report

Abstract

In this study, a potential system for achieving rice intensification (SRI) water management in an agricultural watershed of South Korea was evaluated using the SWAT–APEX Program, SWAPP. The SWAPP was calibrated and verified at the level of the paddy field for a 373.6 km2 watershed using 6 years (2000–2005) of streamflow, and total nitrogen (T-N) and total phosphorus (T-P) stream water quality data. The five ponding depth management of 20, 40, 60, and 80 mm was tested for the entire growing period and the irrigation water saved using this approach was 68.6, 28.0, and 17.3 % when compared to the actual depth management. The T-N load was reduced by 10.1, 4.2, and 2.9 % and the T-P load was reduced by 12.9, 6.0, and 4.5 %, respectively. These results showed that water could be saved and the nutrient load reduced by just applying SRI water management for rice paddies in South Korea.

Keywords

SWAPP Field application Nutrients drainage System of rice intensification Water management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant (11-TI-C06) from Construction Technology Innovation Program funded by Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs of Korean government.

References

  1. Adusumilli R, Laxmi SB (2011) Potential of the system of rice intensification for systemic improvement in rice production and water use: the case of Andhra Pradesh India. Paddy Water Environ 9(1):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouman B (2007) A conceptual framework for the improvement of crop water productivity at different spatial scales. Agric Syst 93:46–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouman BAM, Tuong TP (2001) Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated low land rice. Agric Water Manag 49:11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouman B, Peng S, Castaneda AR, Visperas RM (2005) Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agric Water Manag 74:87–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi JD, Park WJ, Park KW, Lim KJ (2012) Feasibility of SRI methods for reduction of irrigation and NPS pollution in Korea. Paddy Water Environ. doi: 10.1007/s10333-012-0311-9 Google Scholar
  7. Donigian AS (2000) HSPF Training Workshop Handbook and CD, Lecture #19, Calibration and verification Issues, Slide #L19-22. EPA Headquarters, Washington Information Center, Presented and prepared for U.S. EPA, Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Fageria NK (2007) Yield physiology of rice. J Plant Nutr 30:843–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghritlahre SK, Sarial AK, Ram M, Aneja DR, Singh R (2012) Genetic yield potential of rice through water saving and high-yielding SRI technology. Indian J Agric Sci 82(3):68–71Google Scholar
  10. Godwin DC, Jones CA, Ritchie JT, Vlek PLG, Youngdahl LG (1984) The water and nitrogen components of the CERES models. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Minimum Data Set for Agrotechnology Transfer (ICRISAT,March 1983), 101–106. ICRISAT Center, PatancheruGoogle Scholar
  11. Kassam A, Stoop W, Uphoff N (2011) Review of SRI modifications in rice crop and water management and research issues for making further improvements in agricultural and water productivity. Paddy Water Environ 9(1):163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knisel WG (1980) CREAMS: a field-scale model for chemical, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems. I. Model Documentation, USDA Conservation Research Report No. 26. USDA–ARS, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Krupnik TJ, Shennan C, Rodenburg J (2012) Yield water productivity and nutrient balances under the system of rice intensification and recommended management practices in the sahel. Field Crops Res 130:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laulanie H (1993) Le systeme de riziculture intensive malgache. Tropicultura 11:110–114Google Scholar
  15. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2002) Development of an environment-friendly management and treatment measures for drainage from paddy field.Google Scholar
  16. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2011) http://english.mifaff.go.kr/main.jsp. Accessed 27 Dec 2011
  17. Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs (2011) http://www.waterplan.go.kr/. Accessed 27 Dec 2011
  18. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ndiiri JA, Mari BM, Home PG, Odongo B, Uphoff N (2012) Comparison of water savings of paddy rice under system of rice intensification (SRI) growing rice in MWEA, Kenya. Int J Curr Res Rev 4(6):63–73Google Scholar
  20. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2001) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2000: Draft-April 2001. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, TempleGoogle Scholar
  21. Nyamai M, Mati BM, Home PG, Odongo B, Wanjogu R, Thuranira EG (2012) Improving land and water productivity in basin rice cultivation in Kenya through system of rice intensification. Agric Eng Int CIGR J 14(2):1–9Google Scholar
  22. Paddy and Water Environment (PWE) (2011) Special issue: paddy and water management with the system of rice intensification (SRI). Int Soc Paddy Water Environ Eng 9(1)Google Scholar
  23. Reddy KR, Khaleel R, Overcash MR, Westerman PW (1979) A nonpoint source model for land areas receiving animal wastes: II. Ammonia volatilization. Trans ASAE 22(6):1398–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saleh A, Gallego O (2007) Application of SWAT and APEX using the SWAPP (SWAT–APEX Program) for the upper North Bosque River watershed in Texas. Trans ASABE 50(4):1177–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saleh A, Edward O, Oscar G (2010) Use of CEEOT-SWAPP modeling system for cost-effective targeting and evaluation of environmental pollutants. 21st Century Watershed Technology: Improving Water Quality and Environment Conference Proceedings, 21–24 February 2010, Universidad EARTH, Costa Rica, ASABE Publication Number 701P0210cdGoogle Scholar
  26. Sato S, Yamaji E, Kuroda T (2011) Strategies and engineering adaptions to disseminate SRI methods in large-scale irrigation systems in eastern Indonesia. Paddy Water Environ 9(1):79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Satyanarayana A, Thiyagarajan TM, Uphoff N (2007) Opportunities for water saving with higher yield from the system of rice intensification. Irrig Sci 25:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharif A (2011) Technical adaptations for mechanized SRI production to achieve water saving and increased profitability in Punjab, Pakistan. Paddy Water Environ 9(1):111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stoop WA, Uphoff N, Kassam A (2002) A review of agricultural research issue raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving system for resource poor farmers. Agric Syst 71:249–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Styger E (2012) Increasing rice yields and saving water: Lessons for Policy and Practice—The system of rice intensification (SRI) Cornell University, Ithaca USA Knowledge for Development, November 20, 2012Google Scholar
  31. Styger E, Attaher MA, Guindo H, Ibrahim H, Diaty M, Abba I, Traore M (2011) Application of system of rice intensification practices in the arid environment of the Timbuktu region in Mali. Paddy Water Environ 9(1):137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Uphoff N, Kassam A, Harwood R (2011) SRI as a methodology for raising crop and water productivity: productive adaptations in rice agronomy and irrigation water management. Paddy Water Environ 9(1):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Veeraputhiran R, Balasubramanian R, Pandian BJ, Chelladurai M, Tamilselvi VG, Renganathan Rm (2012) Influence of system of rice intensification on yield, water use and economics through farmers’ participatory approach. Madras Agric J 99(4–6):251–254Google Scholar
  34. Wang X, Hoffman DW, Wolfe JE, Williams JR, Fox WE (2009) Modeling the effectiveness of conservation practices at shoal creek watershed, Texas, using APEX. Trans ASABE 52(4):1181–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams JR, Arnold JG, Srinivasan R (2000) The APEX Model. BRC Report No. 00-06. Texas A&M University, Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Blacklands Research Center, TempleGoogle Scholar
  36. Yoon CG, Ham JH, Jeon JH (2003) Mass balance analysis in Korean paddy rice culture. Paddy Water Environ 1(2):99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu C, Northcott WJ, McIsaac GF (2004) Development of an artificial neural network for hydrologic and water quality modeling of agricultural watersheds. Trans ASAE 47(1):285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chung-Gil Jung
    • 1
  • Jong-Yoon Park
    • 1
  • Seong-Joon Kim
    • 1
  • Geun-Ae Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental System EngineeringKonkuk UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations