Prioritizing locations for the riparian establishment based on spatiotemporal change of riparian forest area at a watershed scale
- 187 Downloads
A majority of streams in Korea have been channelized and their adjacent flood plains have been converted for anthropogenic land use, especially in urbanized areas. Fortunately, recent elevated public recognition to the stream ecosystem has led to governmental efforts to conserve riparian areas. In this study, a simple method to prioritize locations for riparian establishment was developed at a watershed scale based on spatiotemporal change of riparian forest area. The developed method was applied for the Ansung and Sapkyo watersheds, which were under consideration for the stream riparian area establishment by the Korean Ministry of Environment. Two riparian forest indices, Riparian Forest Index (RFI) and Riparian Forest Change Index (RFCI) were developed to represent spatial and temporal change of watershed riparian forest, respectively. LANSAT satellite images with a 30 m × 30 m resolution were used to estimate the two riparian forest indices. A precautionary approach, which intends to preserve the existing riparian forests as much as possible, was applied by ranking sub-watersheds based on the two riparian forest indices to prioritize locations for the riparian establishment at a sub-watershed level. The results showed that overall urban land cover in riparian areas increased while forests and cropland decreased over the past 25 years. More importantly, riparian forest removal occurred more rapidly in the riparian area, which is one of the most important niches for riparian ecosystems, as compared to the entire watershed. Most riparian forests appeared to be located upstream of the watersheds, and thus it is important to develop management measures to preserve existing riparian forests from human activities. The developed approach could be a useful tool that can assist policy makers to prioritize locations for the riparian area establishment. However, this method has limitations of only considering riparian forest area and therefore, other aspects such as stream morphology as well as ecology needs to be incorporated into riparian area determination process as they become available in the future. In addition, considering that substantial portions of riparian areas have already been disturbed, the restoration aspect of the impaired riparian also needs to be investigated further.
KeywordsRiparian forest Land cover analysis Prioritization Riparian area establishment Riparian index
This work was funded in part by the National Environmental Research Institute of the Ministry of Environment and the Korea Environment Institute in the Republic of Korea.
- Bentrup G (2008) Conservation buffers: design guidelines for buffers, corridors and greenways. USDA Forest Service southern research station, Asheville, North Carolina. Technical Report SRS-109Google Scholar
- Claggett PR, Okay JA, Stehman SV (2010) Monitoring regional riparian forest cover change using stratified sampling and multiresolution imagery. J Am Water Resour As (JAWRA) 46(2):334–343Google Scholar
- Hawes E, Smith M (2005) Riparian buffer zones: functions and recommended widths, Eightmile River Wild and Scenic Study CommitteeGoogle Scholar
- KMA (2008) Korea meteorological administration weather data from 1971 to 2007. http://www.kma.go.kr/
- Knighton D (1998) Fluvial forms and processes: a new perspective. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Korean Ministry of Environment (2007) A plan of stream ecological restoration project for the coming 10 years (‘06–‘15)Google Scholar
- Parkyn S (2004) Review of riparian buffer zone effectiveness, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry technical paper No. 2004/05, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- USDA Forest Service (1998) Chesapeake Bay riparian handbook: a guide for establishing and maintaining riparian forest buffers. USDA Forest Service, Radnor, PAGoogle Scholar
- Wenger S (1999) A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent, and vegetation. Publication of the Office of Public Service and Outreach, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Wang GQ, Dai BX, Li TJ (2007) Classification and codification methods of stream networks in a river basin: a review. Environ Inform Arch 5:364–372Google Scholar