Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 41–52 | Cite as

Rice root growth and physiological responses to SRI water management and implications for crop productivity

  • Abha MishraEmail author
  • Vilas M. Salokhe


This paper reports on several research findings on rice root responses, in terms of growth and physiology, manifested when applying System of Rice Intensification water management principles under semi-field and field conditions, in conjunction with variations in plant density and microbial density in the soil. The research aimed to learn about causal relationships, if any, between rice root and shoot growth at different growth stages of the rice plant’s development and their cumulative effect on yield, which is affected by both biotic and abiotic influences. It was seen that greater root length density and a higher rate of root activity affected the yield-contributing parameters in all of the trials, whether conducted under semi-field or field conditions. At the same time, both root parameters were significantly affected by the water regime, soil microbial density, and planting pattern, the three main factors considered. The most important finding observed under semi-field conditions was that enhanced microbial density in the soil improved the sink capacity of the rice plants under all water regimes evaluated. Positive correlations were found between the chlorophyll content of the flag leaf and the duration of grain filling, between the chlorophyll content of plants’ lower leaves and their roots’ oxidizing activity rate, and the roots’ oxidizing activity rate at later growth stage and the available soil nitrogen. These relationships can significantly improve rice plants’ physiological efficiency and hence grain yield, provided that soil nutrients are not a limiting factor and when source–sink demand is maintained simultaneously. To realize the highest crop yield per hectare, both planting pattern and spacing are factors that need to be optimized. This paper in its conclusion considers the relevance of exploiting roots’ potential for plasticity to enhance crop productivity in the context of impending water constraints and climate-change effects.


Alternative water regime Root length density Root oxidizing activity rate Root plasticity System of Rice Intensification 



The authors would like to thank reviewers for assistances in the improvement of manuscript.


  1. Ceesay M, Reid WS, Fernandes ECM, Uphoff NT (2006) The effect of repeated soil wetting and drying on low land rice yield with System of Rice Intensification (SRI) methods. Int J Agric Sustain 4:5–14Google Scholar
  2. Conrad R (2007) Microbial ecology of methanogens and methanotrophs. Adv Agron 96:1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Debi BR, Taketa S, Ichii M (2005) Cytokinin inhibits lateral root formation but stimulates lateral root elongation in rice (Oryza sativa). J Plant Physiol 162:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Faiss M, Zalubilova J, Strnad M, Schmulling T (1997) Conditional transgenic expression of the IPT gene indicates a function for cytokinins in paracrine signaling in whole tobacco plants. Plant J 12:401–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fitz Gerald JN, Lehti-Shiu MD, Ingram PA, Deak KI, Biesiada T, Malamy JE (2006) Identification of quantitative trait loci that regulate Arabidopsis root system size and plasticity. Genetics 172:485–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frenzel P (2000) Plant-associated methane oxidation in rice fields and wetlands. Adv Microb Ecol 16:85–114Google Scholar
  7. Friend AL, Eide MR, Hinckley TM (1990) Nitrogen stress alters root proliferation in Douglas fir seedlings. Can J For Res 20:1524–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kar S, Varade SB, Subramanyam TK, Ghildyal BP (1974) Nature and growth pattern of rice root system under submerged and unsaturated conditions. Il Riso 23:173–179Google Scholar
  9. Kern JS, Gong ZT, Zhang GL, Zhuo HZ, Luo GB (1997) Spatial analysis of methane emission from paddy soil in China and the potential for emission reduction. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 49:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krouk G, Lacombe B, Bielach A, Perrine-Walker F, Malinska K, Mounier E, Hoyerova K, Tillard P, Ljung K, Zazimalova E, Benkova E, Nacry P, Gojon A (2010) Nitrate-regulated auxin transport by NRT1.1 defines a mechanism for nutrient-sensing in plants. Dev Cell 18:927–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCauley GN (1990) Sprinkler vs flood irrigation in traditional rice production regions of southeast Texas. Agron J 82:677–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2008a) Seedling characteristics and the early growth of transplanted rice under different water regimes. Exp Agric 44:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2008b) Growing more rice with less water in Asia: identifying and exploring opportunities through System of Rice Intensification. In: Castalonge OW (ed) Agricultural systems: economics, technology and diversity. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, pp 173–191Google Scholar
  14. Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2010) The effects of planting pattern and water regime on root morphology, physiology and grain yield of rice. J Agron Crop Sci 196:368–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mishra HS, Rathore TR, Pant RC (1997) Root growth, water potential and yield of irrigated rice. Irrigation Sci 17:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishra A, Whitten M, Ketelaar JW, Salokhe VM (2006) The system of rice intensification (SRI): a challenge for science, and an opportunity for farmer empowerment towards sustainable agriculture. Int J Agric Sustain 4:193–212Google Scholar
  17. Mouchel CF, Briggs GC, Hardtke CS (2004) Natural genetic variation in Arabidopsis identifies BREVIS RADIX, a novel regulator of cell proliferation and elongation in the root. Genes Dev 18:700–714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neue HU (1993) Methane emission from rice fields. Bioscience 43:466–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nguyen GN, Sutton BG (2009) Water deficit reduced fertility of young microspores resulting in a decline of viable mature pollen and grain set in rice. J Agron Crop Sci 195:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Osaki M, Shinano T, Matsumoto M, Zheng T, Tadano T (1997) A root–shoot interaction hypothesis for high productivity of field crops. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 43:1079–1084Google Scholar
  21. Sah RN, Mikkelsen DS (1983) Availability and utilization of fertilizer nitrogen by rice under alternate flooding II: effects on growth and nitrogen use efficiency. Plant Soil 75:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Samejima H, Kondo M, Ito O, Nozoe T, Shinano T, Osaki M (2005) Charaterization of root system with respect to morphological traits and nitrogen absorbing ability in new plant type of tropical lines. J Plant Nutr 50:545–554Google Scholar
  23. San-oh Y, Sugiyama T, Yoshita D, Ookawa T, Hirasawa T (2006) The effect of planting pattern on the rate of photosynthesis and related processes during ripening in rice plants. Field Crops Res 96:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sato S, Uphoff N (2007) A review of on-farm evaluation of system of rice intensification (SRI) methods in eastern Indonesia. CAB Review: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 54, 2. CABI, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. Stoop WA, Uphoff N, Kassam AH (2002) A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving farming systems for resource-poor farmers. Agric Syst 71:249–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thakur AK, Uphoff N, Antony E (2010) An assessment of physiological effects of system of rice intensification (SRI) practices compared to recommended rice cultivation practices in India. Exp Agric 46:77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yan X, Akiyama H, Yagi K, Akimoto H (2009) Global estimations of the inventory and mitigation potential of methane emissions from rice cultivation conducted using the 2006 Intergovenmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines. Global Biogeochem Cycles 23. doi: 10.1029/2008GM003299
  28. Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Liu L, Zhu O (2003) Post-anthesis water deficit enhance grain filling in two-line hybrid rice. Crop Sci 43:2099–2108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang H, Forde BG (1998) An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. Science 279:407–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang Z, Zhang S, Yang J, Zhang J (2008) Yield, grain quality and water use efficiency of rice under non-flooded mulching cultivation. Field Crops Res 108:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environment, Resources and DevelopmentAsian Institute of TechnologyKlong LuangThailand
  2. 2.Kaziranga UniversityJorhatIndia

Personalised recommendations