Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 129–135 | Cite as

An opportunity for increasing factor productivity for rice cultivation in The Gambia through SRI

  • Mustapha Ceesay
Technical Report


Promising results from an increasing number of field evaluations of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) conducted in Asia and Africa indicate that African farmers could increase their rice production while lowering costs of operation and reducing the need for water by utilizing its principles and practices. This system relies not on external inputs to raise productivity but on alternative methods for managing rice plants and the soil and water resources devoted to their cultivation. Farmers in sub-Saharan Africa increasingly have to cope with the impacts of adverse climate effects because water shortages and long dry spells during the cropping season are becoming common, even in lowland rice agroecosystems. SRI management practices create both larger rice root systems that make their plants more resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses and more conducive environments for beneficial soil microflora and fauna to flourish. Better plant growth and development result from promoting plant–soil synergies. Controlled fertilizer management experiments conducted with SRI practices in The Gambia have showed that grain production can be significantly increased without higher application of inorganic fertilizer and with less requirement for water. SRI management practices with fertilizer application at the national recommended dose produced a grain yield of 7.6 t ha−1. Water productivity was greatly increased, with 0.76 g of grain produced per kg total water input, compared to 0.10 g of grain per kg of water when the crop was continuously flooded. Recent hikes in fuel prices and consequent rises in input costs are making domestic rice production less attractive and importation even more attractive. Computation of production costs showed that SRI production, not needing heavy applications of fertilizer, is economically cost-effective. Achieving yield increases through ever-higher fertilizer applications is not economically or environmentally viable. SRI management with recommended fertilizer applications produced a net return of $853 ha−1 compared to $37 when using farmers’ present low-productivity practices.


Rice profitability Rice yield System of Rice Intensification Water productivity 


  1. Birch HF (1958) The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen. Plant Soil 10:9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cabrera ML (1993) Modeling the flush of N mineralization caused by drying and rewetting soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ceesay M, Reid WS, Fernandes ECM, Uphoff N (2006) Effects of repeated soil wetting and drying on lowland rice yield with System of Rice Intensification (SRI) methods. Int J Agric Sustain 4:5–14Google Scholar
  4. Dobermann A, Fairhurst T (2000) Rice: nutrient disorders and nutrient management. IRRI, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliot ET (1986) Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forno DA, Yoshida S, Asher CJ (1975) Zinc deficiency in rice. I. Factors associated with the deficiency. Plant Soil J 42:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haygarth PM, Turner BL (2001) Phosphorus solubilization in rewetted soils. Nature 411:258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Inubushi K, Wada H (1987) Easily decomposable organic matter in paddy soils. VII. Effect of various pretreatments on N mineralization in submerged soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 33:567–576Google Scholar
  9. Kar S, Varade SB, Subramanyam TK, Ghildyal BP (1974) Nature and growth pattern of rice root system under submerged and unsaturated conditions. Il Riso 23:173–179Google Scholar
  10. Khush GS (1996) Prospects and approaches to increasing the genetic yield potential of rice. In: Evenson RE, Herdt RW, Hossain M (eds) Rice research in Asia: progress and priorities. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 57–71Google Scholar
  11. Kronzucker HJ, Siddiqui MY, Glass ADM, Kirk GJD (1999) Nitrate-ammonium synergism in rice: a subcellular flux analysis. Plant Physiol 119:1041–1045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moore PA, Patrick WH (1988) Effect of zinc deficiency on alcohol dehydrogenase activity and nutrient uptake in rice. Agron Sci Soc Am J 80:882–885Google Scholar
  13. Schneiders M, Scherer HW (1998) Fixation and release of ammonium in flooded rice soils as affected by redox potential. Eur J Agron 8:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seneviratne R, Wild A (1985) Effect of mild drying on the mineralization of soil nitrogen. Plant Soil 84:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sheehy JE, Peng SB, Dobermann A, Mitchell PL, Ferrer A, Yang JC, Zou YB, Zhong XH, Huang JL (2004) Fantastic yields in the system of rice intensification: fact or fallacy. Field Crops Res 88:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stoop W, Uphoff N, Kassam A (2002) A review of agricultural research issues raised by the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: opportunities for improving farming systems for resource-poor farmers. Agric Syst 71:249–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Uphoff N (2002) Opportunities for raising yields by changing management practices: the system of rice intensification in Madagascar. In: Uphoff N (ed) Agroecological innovations: increasing food production with participatory development. Earthscan, London, pp 145–161Google Scholar
  18. Uphoff N (2004) System of Rice Intensification responds to 21st century needs. Rice Today 3:42–43Google Scholar
  19. Uphoff N, Randriamiharisoa R (2002) Reducing water use in irrigated rice production with the Madagascar System of Rice Intensification (SRI). In: Bouman BAM et al (eds) Water-wise rice production. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, pp 71–87Google Scholar
  20. Vlek PLG, Craswell ET (1979) Effect of nitrogen source and management on ammonia volatilization losses from flooded rice soil systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yamah A (2002) The practice of the System of Rice Intensification in Sierra Leone. In: Uphoff N et al (eds) Assessments of the System of Rice Intensification. Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development, Ithaca, NY, pp 103–105 (
  22. Ying J, Peng SB, He Q, Yang H, Yang C, Visperas RM, Cassman KG (1998) Comparison of high-yield rice in tropical and subtropical environments, I. Determinants of grain and dry matter yields. Field Crops Res 57:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Agricultural Research InstituteBrikamaThe Gambia

Personalised recommendations