Advertisement

Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 253–262 | Cite as

Appropriation of Río San Juan water by Monterrey City, Mexico: implications for agriculture and basin water sharing

  • Christopher A. Scott
  • Francisco Flores-López
  • Jesús R. Gastélum
Article

Abstract

Monterrey metropolitan area’s growth has resulted in water transfers from the Río San Juan basin with significant impacts for downstream water users, especially farmers in the Bajo Río San Juan (BRSJ) irrigation district. El Cuchillo dam is the centerpiece of the basin’s water management infrastructure and has become the flashpoint of a multi-faceted water dispute between the states of Nuevo León and Tamaulipas as well as between urban and agricultural water interests in the basin. Subsequent to El Cuchillo’s implementation in 1994, the BRSJ irrigation district has been modifying its irrigation operations to adjust to the new water availability scenario. Compensation arrangements for farmers have been established, including crop loss payments on the order of US$ 100 per hectare un-irrigable due to the diversion of water to Monterrey plus 60% of the water diverted to be returned to farmers as treated effluent via the Ayancual Creek and Pesquería River, a process with its own water competition and environmental implications. The Mexican irrigation sector will continue to face intense competition for water given: (a) low water productivity in agriculture leading decision-makers to allocate water to higher productivity uses particularly in cities, (b) priority accorded to the domestic use component of municipal water supply, and in the BRSJ case, (c) Mexico’s national interests in meeting its water sharing obligations with the United States.

Keywords

Water transfer Water productivity Water compensation El Cuchillo Rio Grande watershed Effluent 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Luis Rendón-Pimentel for his help to obtain relevant information as well as the National Water Commission. This study would not have been possible without support from the International Water Management Institute and the Taiwan Agricultural Engineering Research Center.

References

  1. Barajas Aguilar I (2000) Interregional transfer of water in Northeastern Mexico: the dispute over El Cuchillo. World Commission on DamsGoogle Scholar
  2. Centro de Estudios Fronterizos y Promoción de los Derechos Humanos, A.C. (CEFPRODHAC) (2001) El Agua en la Frontera. Reynosa, Tamaulipas, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  3. Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA) (2001) Programa Nacional Hidráulico 2001–2006. Comisión Nacional del Agua, Mexico City, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  4. Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA) (2005a) Plan Director para la Modernización Integral del Distrito de Riego 026 Bajo Río San Juan, Tamaulipas. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Mexico, DF, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  5. Comisión Nacional del Agua (CNA) (2005b) Síntesis de las Estadísticas del Agua en México. Comisión Nacional del Agua, Mexico, DF, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  6. Flores-Laureano JS, Návar J (2002) An assessment of stream water quality of the Rio San Juan, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, 1995–1996. J Environ Qual 31:1256–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flores-López F, Scott CA (1999) Simulación de alternativas del manejo del agua en la cuenca del río San Juan, México. Serie Latinoamericana: No. 9. IWMI. International Water Management Institute, Mexico, DFGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson SH III (1997) Irrigation management transfer: decentralizing public irrigation in Mexico. Water Int 22:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mexican Institute of Water Technology (IMTA) (2001) Final Evaluation of Water Availability in the Río San Juan Basin. Final Report: Project TH0113. Agreement of 2001 projects SGP-IMTA, Coordination of Hydrologic Technology. IMTA, Jiutepec, MorelosGoogle Scholar
  10. Rodríguez Castro VA, Quiroz Martínez H, Badii Zabeh MH, Solís Rojas C (2004) Riesgos Entomológicos Asociados a Aguas Contaminadas. Revista Salud Pública y Nutrición 5(3)Google Scholar
  11. Rymshaw E (1998) Análisis del desempeño de la irrigación en los distritos de riego Bajo Río Bravo y Bajo Río San Juan, Tamaulipas, México. Serie Latinoamericana: No. 1. IWMI, International Water Management Institute, Mexico, DFGoogle Scholar
  12. Wester P, Scott CA, Burton M (2004) River basin closure and institutional change in Mexico’s Lerma-Chapala Basin. In: Svendsen M (ed) Irrigation and River Basin management: options for governance and institutions, Chap. 8, pp 125–144. CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Wilder M, Lankao PR (2006) Paradoxes of decentralization: water reform and social implications in Mexico. World Develop 34(11):1977–1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. World Bank Group (2006a) “Data\bytopic\Agriculture” Retrieved 11/07/2006, 2006Google Scholar
  15. World Bank Group (2006b) “Mexico at a glance” Retrieved 11/07/2006, 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher A. Scott
    • 1
  • Francisco Flores-López
    • 2
  • Jesús R. Gastélum
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Regional Development, and Udall Center for Studies in Public PolicyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological and Environmental EngineeringCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.HydroSystems Inc.PhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations