Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Elephant behavior toward the dead: A review and insights from field observations

Abstract

Many nonhuman animals have been documented to take an interest in their dead. A few socially complex and cognitively advanced taxa—primates, cetaceans, and proboscideans—stand out for the range and duration of behaviors that they display at conspecific carcasses. Here, we review the literature on field observations of elephants at carcasses to identify patterns in behaviors exhibited. We add to this literature by describing elephant responses to dead elephants in the Samburu National Reserve, northern Kenya. The literature review indicated that behavior of elephants at carcasses most often included approaches, touching, and investigative responses, and these occurred at varying stages of decay, from fresh carcasses to scattered and sun-bleached bones. During our own observations, we also witnessed elephants visiting and revisiting carcasses during which they engaged in extensive investigative behavior, stationary behavior, self-directed behavior, temporal gland streaming, and heightened social interactions with other elephants in the vicinity of a carcass. Elephants show broad interest in their dead regardless of the strength of former relationships with the dead individual. Such behaviors may allow them to update information regarding their social context in this highly fluid fission–fusion society. The apparent emotionality and widely reported inter-individual differences involved in elephant responses to the dead deserve further study. Our research contributes to the growing discipline of comparative thanatology to illuminate the cognition and context of nonhuman animal response to death, particularly among socially complex species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Anderson JR (2018) Chimpanzees and death. Phil Trans R Soc B 373:20170257

  2. Anderson JR, Biro D, Pettitt P (2018) Evolutionary thanatology. Phil Trans R Soc B 373:20170262

  3. Bates LA, Sayialel KN, Njiraini NW et al (2008) African elephants have expectations about the locations of out-of-sight family members. Biol Lett 4:34–36. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0529

  4. Bercovitch FB (2012) Giraffe cow reaction to the death of her newborn calf. Afr J Ecol 51:376–379

  5. Bere R (1966) The African elephant. Golden Press, New York

  6. Biro D, Humle T, Koops K et al (2010) Chimpanzee mothers at Bossou, Guinea carry the mummified remains of their dead infants. Curr Biol 20:R351–R352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.031

  7. Bruck JN (2013) Decades-long social memory in bottlenose dolphins—20 years later they remember the dolphins they knew. Proc R Soc B 280:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1726

  8. Byrne RW, Bates LA (2010) Primate social cognition: uniquely primate, uniquely social, or just unique? Neuron 65:815–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.010

  9. Campbell LAD, Tkaczynski PJ, Mouna M, Qarro M, Waterman J, Majolo B (2016) Behavioral responses to injury and death in wild Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Primates 57:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-016-0540-4

  10. Chevalier-Skolnikoff S, Liska J (1993) Tool use by wild and captive elephants. Anim Behav 46:209–219

  11. de Silva S, Ranjeewa ADG, Kryazhimskiy S (2011) The dynamics of social networks among female Asian elephants. BMC Ecol 11:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-11-17

  12. Dorward LJ (2014) New record of cannibalism in the common hippo, Hippopotamus amphibius (Linnaeus, 1758). Afr J Ecol 53:385–387

  13. Douglas-Hamilton I (1972) On the ecology and behaviour of the African elephant. Oxford, UK

  14. Douglas-Hamilton I, Douglas-Hamilton O (1975) Among the Elephants. The Viking Press, New York

  15. Douglas-Hamilton I, Bhalla S, Wittemyer G, Vollrath F (2006) Behavioural reactions of elephants towards a dying and deceased matriarch. Appl Anim Behav Sci 100:87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.014

  16. Dudzinski KM, Sakai M, Masaki K et al (2003) Behavioural observations of bottlenose dolphins towards two dead conspecifics. Aquat Mamm 29:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1578/016754203101023951

  17. Foley C, Pettorelli N, Foley L (2008) Severe drought and calf survival in elephants. Biol Lett 4:541–544. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0370

  18. Goldenberg SZ, Wittemyer G (2018) Orphaning and natal group dispersal are associated with social costs in female elephants. Anim Behav 143:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.07.002

  19. Goldenberg SZ, Douglas-Hamilton I, Wittemyer G (2016) Vertical transmission of social roles drives resilience to poaching in elephant networks. Curr Biol 26:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.005

  20. Goncalves A, Biro D (2018) Comparative thanatology, an integrative approach: exploring sensory/cognitive aspects of death recognition in vertebrates and invertebrates. Phil Trans R Soc B 373:20170263

  21. Hart BL, Hart L, Pinter-Wollman N (2008) Large brains and cognition: where do elephants fit in? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.05.012

  22. Harthoorn AM (1970) The flying syringe: ten years of immobilising wild animals in Africa. Geoffrey Bles Ltd, Great Britain

  23. King BJ (2013) When animals mourn. Sci Am 309:62–67

  24. McComb K, Moss C, Sayialel S, Baker L (2000) Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim Behav 59:1103–1109. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1406

  25. McComb K, Baker L, Moss C (2006) African elephants show high levels of interest in the skulls and ivory of their own species. Biol Lett 2:26–28. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0400

  26. Merte CE, Gough KF, Schulte BA (2008) Investigation of a fresh African elephant carcass by conspecifics. Pachyderm 45:124–126

  27. Miller AK, Hensman MC, Hensman S et al (2015) African elephants (Loxodonta africana) can detect TNT using olfaction: implications for biosensor application. Appl Anim Behav Sci 171:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.003

  28. Moss CJ (1988) Elephant memories: thirteen years in the life of an elephant family. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  29. Patterson EM, Mann J (2011) The ecological conditions that favor tool use and innovation in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022243

  30. Payne K (2003) Sources of social complexity in the three elephant species. In: de Waal F, Tyack P (eds) Animal social complexity: intelligence, culture, and individualized societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 80–84

  31. Pierce J (2013) The dying animal. J Bioeth Inq 10:469–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9480-5

  32. Polansky L, Kilian W, Wittemyer G (2015) Elucidating the significance of spatial memory on movement decisions by African savannah elephants using state-space models. Proc R Soc B. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.3042

  33. Poole J (1996) Coming of age with elephants. Hyperion, New York

  34. Poole JH, Granli P (2011) Signals, Gestures, and Behavior of African Elephants. In: Moss CJ, Croze H, Lee PC (eds) The Amboseli elephants: a long-term perspective on a long-lived mammal. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 109–124

  35. Prounis GS, Shields WM (2013) Necrophobic behavior in small mammals. Behav Process 94:41–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.12.001

  36. Rasmussen HB (2005) Reproductive tactics of male African savannah elephants (Loxodonta africana). Oxford University, Oxford, UK

  37. Reggente MALV, Papale E, McGinty N, Eddy L, de Lucia GA, Bertuli CG (2018) Social relationships and death-related behaviour in aquatic mammals: a systematic review. Phil Trans R Soc B 373:20170260

  38. Shoshani J, Kupsky WJ, Marchant GH (2006) Elephant brain Part I: gross morphology, functions, comparative anatomy, and evolution. Brain Res Bull 70:124–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.03.016

  39. Sikes SK (1971) The natural history of the African Elephant. American Elsevier Publishing Company Inc, New York

  40. Spinage C (1994) Elephants. T & A D Poyser Ltd, London

  41. Swift K, Marzluff JM (2018) Occurrence and variability of tactile interactions between wild American crows and dead conspecifics. Phil Trans R Soc B 373:20170259. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0259

  42. Tokuyama N, Moore DL, Graham KE et al (2017) Cases of maternal cannibalism in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) from two different field sites, Wamba and Kokolopori, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Primates 58:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-016-0582-7

  43. van Schaik CP, Deaner RO, Merrill MY (1999) The conditions for tool use in primates: implications for the evolution of material culture. J Hum Evol 36:719–741. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1999.0304

  44. Wittemyer G (2001) The elephant population of Samburu and Buffalo Springs National Reserves, Kenya. Afr J Ecol 39:357–365

  45. Wittemyer G, Douglas-Hamilton I, Getz W (2005) The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multitiered social structures. Anim Behav 69:1357–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.08.018

  46. Wittemyer G, Getz WM, Vollrath F, Douglas-Hamilton I (2007) Social dominance, seasonal movements, and spatial segregation in African elephants: a contribution to conservation behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1919–1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0432-0

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Kenyan Office of the President of the Republic of Kenya, the Samburu and Isiolo governments, and the Kenya Wildlife Service for permission to conduct research in Samburu and Buffalo Springs National Reserves. Jerenimo Leperei assisted with data collection. The project was funded by Save the Elephants, the National Science Foundation GRFP (#DGE-1321845), and the Graduate Degree Program in Ecology and Warner College of Natural Resources at Colorado State University.

Author information

Correspondence to Shifra Z. Goldenberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 2 (MTS 187638 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MTS 298980 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MP4 106599 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (MP4 484621 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MTS 187638 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MTS 298980 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MP4 106599 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (MP4 484621 kb)

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldenberg, S.Z., Wittemyer, G. Elephant behavior toward the dead: A review and insights from field observations. Primates 61, 119–128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-019-00766-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Death and dying
  • Evolutionary thanatology
  • Loxodonta africana
  • Loxodonta cyclotis
  • Social complexity