, Volume 59, Issue 6, pp 523–530 | Cite as

Functional decline of sweet taste sensitivity of colobine monkeys

  • Emiko Nishi
  • Nami Suzuki-Hashido
  • Takashi Hayakawa
  • Yamato Tsuji
  • Bambang Suryobroto
  • Hiroo ImaiEmail author
Original Article


For many primates, sweet taste is palatable and is an indicator that the food contains carbohydrates, such as sugars and starches, as energy sources. However, we have found that Asian colobine monkeys (lutungs and langurs) have low sensitivity to various natural sugars. Sweet tastes are recognized when compounds bind to the sweet taste receptor TAS1R2/TAS1R3 in the oral cavity; accordingly, we conducted a functional assay using a heterologous expression system to evaluate the responses of Javan lutung (Trachypithecus auratus) TAS1R2/TAS1R3 to various natural sugars. We found that Javan lutung TAS1R2/TAS1R3 did not respond to natural sugars such as sucrose and maltose. We also conducted a behavioral experiment using the silvery lutung (Trachypithecus cristatus) and Hanuman langur (Semnopithecus entellus) by measuring the consumption of sugar-flavored jellies. Consistent with the functional assay results for TAS1R2/TAS1R3, these Asian colobine monkeys showed no preference for sucrose or maltose jellies. These results demonstrate that sweet taste sensitivity to natural sugars is low in Asian colobine monkeys, and this may be related to the specific feeding habits of colobine monkeys.


Colobine monkeys Taste sensitivity Natural sugars Sweet taste receptor TAS1R2/TAS1R3 



The authors would like to thank Drs. T. Ueda, T. Misaka, and H. Matsunami for providing cells and vectors, and Dr. K. A. Widayati, L. H. Purba, and S. Nila for supporting the collection of fecal samples from Javan lutungs. Our thanks are also due to T. Hoshino, T. Funahashi, and other keepers and veterinarians of the Japan Monkey Centre for taking care of the colobine monkeys, supporting behavioral experiments, and collecting genetic samples. We also thank A. Yamanaka and CHEMR of KUPRI for taking care of the Japanese macaques. This study was financed by JSPS KAKENHI (#16H01338, #15H02421, #15H05242, and #25257409 to HI; #12J04270 and #16K18630 to TH; and #12J04300 and #17K15203 to NSH), research grants from Kobayashi International Scholarship Foundation, and the JSPS bilateral research program between Japan and Indonesia.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Colobine monkey behavioral experiments were conducted at the Japan Monkey Centre, Aichi, Japan. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Japan Monkey Centre (#2017-014) based on the Ethical Guidelines for Research in Japan Monkey Centre (April 1st, 2016) as Collaborative Research of the Japan Monkey Centre (#2017013) The Japanese macaque experiment was conducted at the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University. Both experiments were approved by the Animal Welfare and Animal Care Committee of Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University (#2017-178) and were in compliance with the Guidelines for Care and Use of Nonhuman Primates of the Primates Research Institute, Kyoto University (Version 3, issued in 2010). These guidelines were prepared based on the provisions of the Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiments (June 1, 2006; Science Council of Japan), Basic Policies for the Conduct of Animal Experiments in Research Institutions under the Jurisdiction of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (effective on June 1, 2006; Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare), Fundamental Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiment and Related Activities in Academic Research Institutions (Notice No. 71 of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology dated June 1, 2006), and Standards Relating to the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals and Relief of Pain (Notice No. 88 of the Ministry of the Environment dated April 28, 2006).

Supplementary material

10329_2018_679_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (90 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 89 kb)
10329_2018_679_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (80 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 79 kb)
10329_2018_679_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (44 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 43 kb)


  1. Benefit BR (2000) Old World monkey origins and diversion: an evolutionary study of diet and dentition. In: Whitehead PF, Jolly CJ (eds) Old World monkeys. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hill DA (1997) Seasonal variation in the feeding behavior and diet of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata yakui) in lowland forest of Yakushima. Am J Primatol 43:305–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Iwamoto T (1982) Food and nutritional condition of free ranging Japanese monkeys on Koshima Islet during winter. Primates 23:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Janiak MC (2016) Digestive enzymes of human and nonhuman primates. Evol Anthropol 25:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jiang P, Josue-Almqvist J, Jin X, Li X, Brand JG, Margolskee RF, Reed DR, Beauchamp GK (2014) The bamboo-eating giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) has a sweet tooth: behavioral and molecular responses to compounds that taste sweet to humans. PLoS One 9:e93043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kool KM (1992) Food selection by the silver leaf monkey, Trachypithecus auratus sondaicus, in relation to plant chemistry. Oecologia 90:527–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kool KM (1993) The diet and feeding behavior of the silver leaf monkey (Trachypithecus auratus sondaicus) in Indonesia. Int J Primatol 14:557–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lambert JE (1998) Primate digestion: interactions among anatomy, physiology, and feeding ecology. Evol Anthropol 7:8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laska M, Schüll E, Schuber HP (1999) Taste preference thresholds for food-associated sugars in baboons (Papio hamadryas anubis). Int J Primatol 20:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lemoine R, Camera SL, Atanassova R, Dédaldéchamp F, Allario T et al (2013) Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front Plant Sci. 4:272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li X, Li W, Wang H, Cao J, Maehashi K, Huang L, Bachmanov AA, Reed DR, Legrand-Defretin V, Beauchamp GK, Brand JG (2005) Pseudogenization of a sweet-receptor gene accounts for cats’ indifference toward sugar. PLoS Genet 1:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li X, Bachmanov AA, Maehashi K, Li W, Lim R, Brand JG, Beauchamp GK, Reed DR, Thai C, Floriano WB (2011) Sweet taste receptor gene variation and aspartame taste in primates and other species. Chem Sens 36:453–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu G, Walter L, Tang S, Tan X, Shi F, Pan H, Roos C, Liu Z, Li M (2014) Differentiated adaptive evolution, episodic relaxation of selective constraints, and pseudonization of umami and sweet taste genes TAS1Rs in catarrhine primates. Front Zool 11:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Masuda K, Koizumi A, Nakajima K, Tanaka T, Abe K, Misaka T, Ishiguro M (2012) Characterization of the modes of binding between human sweet taste receptor and low-molecular-weight sweet compounds. PLoS One 7:e35380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matsuda I, Tuunga A, Bernard H, Sugau J, Hanya G (2013) Leaf selection by two Bornean colobine monkeys in relation to plant chemistry and abundance. Sci Rep 3:1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nijboer J, Clauss M, Olsthoorn M, Noordermeer W, Huisman TR, Verheyen C, van der Kuilen J, Jürgen WS, Beynen AC (2006) Effect of diet on the feces quality in Javan langur (Trachypithecus auratus auratus). J Zoo Wildl Med 37:366–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nishi E, Tsutsui K, Imai H (2016) High maltose sensitivity of sweet taste receptors in the Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata). Sci Rep 6:39352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ohya I, Iwasa M, Komoriya H, Bunai Y, Sagisaka K (1986) Identification of human saliva by antisera to a-amylase in human salivary glands. Tohoku J Exp Med 150:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roper SD, Chaudhari N (2017) Taste buds: cells, signals and synapses. Nat Rev Neurosci 18:485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shimizu M, Goto M, Kawai T, Yamashita A, Kusakabe Y (2014) Distinct human and mouse membrane trafficking systems for sweet taste receptors T1r2 and T1r3. PLoS One 9:e100425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tsuji Y (2010) Regional, temporal, and interindividual variation in the feeding ecology of Japanese macaques. In: Nakagawa N, Nakamichi M, Sugiura H (eds) The Japanese macaques. Springer, Tokyo, pp 99–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsuji Y, Hanya G, Grueter CC (2013) Feeding strategies of primates in temperate and alpine forests: comparison of Asian macaques and colobines. Primates 54:201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ueda T, Ugawa S, Yamamura H, Imaizumi Y, Shimada S (2003) Functional interaction between T2R taste receptors and G-protein alpha subunits expressed in taste receptor cells. J Neurosci 23:7376–7380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang F, Klebansky B, Fine RM, Liu H, Xu H, Servant G, Zoller M, Tachdjian C, Li X (2010) Molecular mechanism of the sweet taste enhancers. PNAS 107:4752–4757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhao GQ, Zhang Y, Hoon MA, Chancrashekar J, Erlenbach I, Ryba NJ, Zuker CS (2003) The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell 115:255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Biology Section, Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Primates Research InstituteKyoto UniversityAichiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife Science (Nagoya Railroad Co., Ltd.), Primates Research InstituteKyoto UniversityAichiJapan
  3. 3.Japan Monkey CentreAichiJapan
  4. 4.Social Systems Evolution Section, Primates Research InstituteKyoto UniversityAichiJapan
  5. 5.Department of BiologyBogor Agricultural UniversityBogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations