Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 185–196 | Cite as

Extractive foraging of toxic caterpillars in wild northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina)

  • Florian Trébouet
  • Ulrich H. Reichard
  • Nantasak Pinkaew
  • Suchinda MalaivijitnondEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Extractive foraging in nonhuman primates may involve different levels of technical complexity in terms of the number of actions that must be performed and the manual dexterity involved. We describe the extractive foraging of caterpillars in wild northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina) at Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. The study group, observed from May to December 2016 (n = 146 days), comprised 60–70 habituated individuals, including 3–4 adult males, 20–23 adult females, and 36–47 immatures. Four adult males and five adult females, observed from September to November 2016 for a total of 24 days, were selected for focal animal sampling. Northern pig-tailed macaques were observed eating at least two families (Erebidae and Limacodidae) and three genera (Macrobrochis sp., Phlossa sp. and Scopelodes sp.) of caterpillars. While the monkeys ate short and small caterpillars with stinging setae and non-setae caterpillars without processing, they performed extensive caterpillar-rubbing behavior on large and long caterpillars with stinging setae. Based on 61 extractive foraging bouts, we found that caterpillar rubbing was hierarchically organized into five stages and 12 elements. Five stages of behavior sequence started with picking the caterpillar up, transporting it to a substrate, rubbing it to remove stinging setae, ingesting it, and then cleaning hands and mouth. Only adult macaques were observed using a leaf to rub stinging caterpillars.

Keywords

Khao Yai National Park Fallback Lepidoptera Caterpillar rubbing Hierarchically organized behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) for permitting FT and UHR to conduct research in the Kingdom of Thailand, and the Department of National Parks, Wildlife, and Plant Conservation (DNP) for allowing us to conduct research in Khao Yai National Park (KYNP). We thank Mr. Kanchit Srinopawan, superintendent of KYNP, and his staff for their support of science research and administrative help. The project was partially funded by a grant from the SIU Graduate and Professional Student Research Awards to FT.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human/animal rights

This research was non-invasive and based solely on observational data, without any animal experiments. Non-human primates observed in this research were previously habituated to human presence.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This research was conducted under research permission from NRCT, DNP, and KYNP in Thailand. All procedures performed in this study involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. This research was carried out under IACUC permit number 15-008 from SIUC.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MOV 57933 kb)

10329_2017_638_MOESM2_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 19 kb)

References

  1. Albert A, Huynen MC, Savini T, Hambuckers A (2013) Influence of food resources on the ranging pattern of northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina). Int J Primatol 34:696–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett TQ (2009) Seasonal home range use and defendability in white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. In: Lappan S, Whittaker DJ (eds) The gibbons: new perspectives on small ape socioecology and population biology. Springer, New York, pp 265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boesch C, Boesch H (1990) Tool use and tool making in wild chimpanzees. Folia Primatol 54:86–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowers MD (1993) Aposematic caterpillars: life-styles of the warningly colored and unpalatable. In: Stamp NE, Casey TM (eds) Caterpillars ecological and evolutionary constraints and foraging. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 331–371Google Scholar
  5. Byrne RW (2005) The maker not the tool: the cognitive significance of great ape manual skills. In: Roux V, Bril B (eds) Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominid behavior. McDonald Institute Monograph series, Cambridge, pp 159–169Google Scholar
  6. Byrne RW, Byrne JM (1993) Complex leaf-gathering skills of mountain gorillas (Gorilla g. berengei): variability and standardization. Am J Primatol 31:241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne RW, Byrne JM (2001) Manual dexterity in the gorilla: bimanual and digit role differentiation in a natural task. Anim Cogn 4:347–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Erickson CJ (1991) Percussive foraging in the aye-aye, Daubentonia madagascariensis. Anim Behav 41:793–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fragaszy DM, Boinski S (1995) Patterns of individual diet choice and efficiency of foraging in wedge-capped capuchin monkeys (Cebus olivaceus). J Comp Psychol 109:339–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbons EF, Lockwood R (1982) One-armed brachiation in gibbons (Hylobates lar). Am J Primatol 3:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson KR (1986) Cognition, brain size, and the extraction of embedded food resources. In: James GE, Phyllis CL (eds) Primate ontogeny, cognition, and social behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 93–103Google Scholar
  12. Gibson KR, Ingold T (1993) Tools, language and cognition in human evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Gumert MD, Malaivijitnond S (2012) Marine prey processed with stone tools by Burmese long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis aurea) in intertidal habitats. Am J Phys Anthropol 149:447–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirata S, Kunio W, Kawai M (2008) “Sweet-potato washing” revisited. In: Matsuzawa T (ed) Primate origins of human cognition and behavior. Springer, Tokyo, pp 487–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hohmann G (1988) A case of simple tool use in wild liontailed macaques (Macaca silenus). Primates 29:565–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Humle T, Fragaszy DM (2011) Tool use and cognition in primates. In: Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Bearder SK, Stumpf RM (eds) Primates in perspective. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 637–651Google Scholar
  17. Isbell LA, Young TP (2007) Interspecific and temporal variation of ant species within Acacia drepanolobium ant domatia, a staple food of patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) in Laikipia, Kenya. Am J Primatol 69:1387–1398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. IUCN and UNEP-WCMC (2017) The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. https://www.protectedplanet.net. Accessed 20 Mar 2017
  19. José-Domínguez JM, Huynen M-C, Garcia CJ, Albert-Daviaud A, Savini T, Asensio N (2015a) Non-territorial macaques can range like territorial gibbons when partially provisioned with food. Biotropica 47:733–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. José-Domínguez JM, Savini T, Asensio N (2015b) Ranging and site fidelity in northern pigtailed macaques (Macaca leonina) over different temporal scales. Am J Primatol 77:841–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawamura S (1954) A new type of behavior of the wild Japanese monkeys: an analysis of an animal culture. Seibutsu Shinka 2:11–13 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  22. Kawamura S (1959) The process of sub-culture propagation among Japanese macaques. Primates 2:43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kitamura S, Suzuki S, Yumoto T, Chuailua P, Plongmai K, Poonswad P, Noma N, Maruhashi T, Suckasam C (2005) A botanical inventory of a tropical seasonal forest in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand: implications for fruit–frugivore interactions. Biodiv Conserv 14:1241–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitamura S, Yumoto T, Noma N, Chuailua P, Maruhashi T, Wohandee P, Poonswad P (2008) Aggregated seed dispersal by wreathed hornbills at a roost site in a moist evergreen forest of Thailand. Ecol Res 23:943–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumara HN, Singh ME, Sharma AK, Singh MR, Ananda Kumar M (2000) Faunal component in the diet of lion-tailed macaque. Primate Rep 58:57–65Google Scholar
  26. McGrew WC (1993) Chimpanzee material culture: implications for human evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. McGrew WC (2014) The ‘other faunivory’ revisited: insectivory in human and non-human primates and the evolution of human diet. J Hum Evol 71:4–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Parker S, Gibson K (1977) Object manipulation, tool use, and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes. J Hum Evol 6:623–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reichard UH, Ganpanakngan M, Barelli C (2012) White-handed gibbons of Khao Yai: social flexibility, complex reproductive strategies, and a slow life history. In: Kappeler PM, Watts DP (eds) Long-term field studies of primates. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 237–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rothman JM, Raubenheimer D, Bryer MAH, Takahashi M, Gilbert CC (2014) Nutritional contributions of insects to primate diets: implications for primate evolution. J Hum Evol 71:59–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Russon AE (1998) The nature and evolution of intelligence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Primates 39:485–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Russon AE, Handayani DP, Kuncoro P, Ferisa A (2007) Orangutan leaf-carrying for nest-building: toward unraveling cultural processes. Anim Cogn 10:189–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sandvik B (2009) World Borders Dataset. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. http://thematicmapping.org/downloads/world_borders.php. Accessed 20 Mar 2017
  34. Smitinand T (1989) Thailand. In: Cambell DC, Hammond HD (eds) Floristic inventory of tropical countries. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, pp 65–82Google Scholar
  35. Stehr FW (1987) Immature insects, vol 1. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, DubuqueGoogle Scholar
  36. Stokes EJ, Byrne RW (2001) Cognitive capacities for behavioural flexibility in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the effect of snare injury on complex manual food processing. Anim Cogn 4:11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Takeshita H, Walraven V (1996) A comparative study of the variety and complexity of object manipulation in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus). Primates 37:423–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tan A, Tan SH, Vyas D, Malaivijitnond S, Gumert M (2015) There is more than one way to crack an oyster: identifying variation in Burmese long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis aurea) stone-tool use. PLoS One 10:e0124733CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Tan A, Luncz L, Haslam M, Malaivijitnond S, Gumert MD (2016) Complex processing of prickly pear cactus (Opuntia sp.) by free-ranging long-tailed macaques: preliminary analysis for hierarchical organisation. Primates 57:141–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Visalberghi E, Fragaszy D (2006) What is challenging about tool use? The capuchin’s perspective. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 529–552Google Scholar
  41. Wheatley BP (1988) Cultural behavior and extractive foraging in Macaca fascicularis. Curr Anthropol 29:516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Trébouet
    • 1
  • Ulrich H. Reichard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nantasak Pinkaew
    • 3
  • Suchinda Malaivijitnond
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologySouthern Illinois University CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA
  2. 2.Center for EcologySouthern Illinois University CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng SaenKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  5. 5.National Primate Research Center of ThailandChulalongkorn UniversitySaraburiThailand

Personalised recommendations