Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 163–171 | Cite as

Small-scale variability in a mosaic tropical rainforest influences habitat use of long-tailed macaques

  • John Chih Mun Sha
  • Siew Chin Chua
  • Ping Ting Chew
  • Hassan Ibrahim
  • Hock Keong Lua
  • Tze Kwan Fung
  • Peng Zhang
Original Article

Abstract

Pristine habitats have generally been considered to be the most important ecological resource for wildlife conservation, but due to forest degradation caused by human activities, mosaics of secondary forests have become increasingly prominent. We studied three forest types in a mosaic tropical forest consisting of short secondary forest (SS), tall secondary forest (TS) and freshwater swamp forest (SF). These forests differed in stand structure and floristic composition, as well as phenological productivity of fruits, flowers and young leaves. We examined habitat use of long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in relation to indices of phenological activity. The macaques used the SS for feeding/foraging more than the TS and the SF. This was because the SS had higher productivity of fruit, which is a preferred food resource for macaques. Stem densities of young leaves in the SS and the TS also influenced habitat use, as they provided more clumped resources. Use of SF was limited, but these forests provided more species-rich resources. Our results showed that M. fascicularis responded to small-scale variability in phenological activity between forest types found in a heterogeneous mosaic forest, with young secondary regrowth forests likely providing the most important food resources. Mosaic landscapes may be important as they can buffer the effects of temporal food resource variability in any given forest type. In our increasingly human-altered landscapes, a better understanding of the role of secondary forest mosaics is crucial to the conservation and management of wildlife habitats and the animals they support.

Keywords

Floristic composition Macaca fascicularis Phenology Stand structure Secondary forest 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all the assistants who took part in this project. We express our sincere gratitude to Chong Kwek Yen, Alex Yee, Shawn Lum, Ali Ibrahim and Gwee Aik Teck for their assistance in plant identification. We thank the National Parks Board Singapore (NParks) for their support, in particular Jeremy Woon, for coordinating the permit procedures for this project (NParks permit NP/RP10-022). We appreciated the assistance of Nobuo Imai for the NMDS analysis. We thank Colin Chapman and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments during the review process.

References

  1. Agoramoorthy G, Sha CM, Hsu MJ (2006) Population, diet and conservation of Malayan flying lemurs in altered and fragmented habitats in Singapore. Biodivers Conserv 15:2177–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aleixo A (1999) Effects of selective logging on a bird community in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Condor 101:537–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behavior 49:227–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altmann SA (1979) Baboons, space, time, and energy. In: Sussman RW (ed) Primate ecology: problem-oriented field studies. Wiley, New York, pp 243–280Google Scholar
  5. Ang HF (2011) Banded leaf monkeys in Singapore: preliminary data on taxonomy, feeding ecology, reproduction, and population size. Dissertation, National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  6. Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Pérez-Elissetche GK, Ordóñez-Gómez JD, González-Zamora A, Chaves ÓM, Sánchez-López S, Chapman CA, Morales-Hernández K, Pablo-Rodríguez M, Ramos-Fernández G (2017) Spider monkeys in human-modified landscapes: the importance of the matrix. Trop Conserv Sci 10:1940082917719788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asner GP, Rudel TK, Aide TM, Defries R, Emerson R (2009) A contemporary assessment of change in humid tropical forests. Conserv Biol 23:1386–1395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cade BS (1997) Comparison of tree basal area and canopy cover in habitat models: subalpine forest. J Wildl Manage 61:326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantley N (1884) Report on the forests of the straits settlements. Singapore Printing Office, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ (1997) Forest regeneration in logged and unlogged forests of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biotropica 29:396–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ (1999) Implications of small scale variation in ecological conditions for the diet and density of red colobus monkeys. Primates 40:215–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Wangham R, Hunt K, Gebo D, Gardner L (1992) Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica 24:527–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman CA, Wrangham RW, Chapman LJ (1995) Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Wrangham RW, Isibirye-Basuta G, Ben-David K (1997) Spatial and temporal variability in the structure of a tropical forest. Afr J Ecol 35:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaves ÓM, Stoner KE, Arroyo-Rodríguez V (2012) Differences in diet between spider monkey groups living in forest fragments and continuous forest in Lacandona, Mexico. Biotropica 44:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chazdon RL, Peres CA, Dent D, Sheil D, Lugo AE, Lamb D, Stork NE, Miller SE (2009) The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests. Conserv Biol 23:1406–1417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Constantino PJ, Wright BW (2009) The importance of fallback foods in primate ecology and evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 140:599–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Corlett RT (1990) Flora and reproductive phenology of the rain forest at Bukit Timah, Singapore. J Trop Ecol 6:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corlett RT (1991a) Plant succession on degraded land in Singapore. J Trop For Sci 4:151161Google Scholar
  20. Corlett RT (1991b) Vegetation. In: Chia L, Ausafur R, Tay D (eds) The biophysical environment of Singapore. Singapore University Press, Singapore, pp 134–154Google Scholar
  21. Corlett RT (1992) The ecological transformation of Singapore, 1819–1990. J Biogeogr 19:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Corlett RT, Primack RB (2011) Tropical rainforests: an ecological and biogeographical comparison, 2nd edn. Wiley, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cristóbal-Azkarate J, Arroyo-Rodríguez V (2007) Diet and activity pattern of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico: effects of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation. Am J Primatol 69:1013–1029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. DeWalt SJ, Maliakal SK, Denslow JS (2003) Changes in vegetation structure and composition along a tropical forest chronosequence: implications for wildlife. For Ecol Manage 182:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Donati G, Kesch K, Ndremifidy K, Schmidt SL, Ramanamanjato JB, Borgognini-Tarli SM, Ganzhorn JU (2011) Better few than hungry: flexible feeding ecology of collared lemurs Eulemur collaris in littoral forest fragments. PLoS ONE 6:e19807CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunn JC, Cristóbal-Azkarate J, Vea JJ (2009) Differences in diet and activity pattern between two groups of Alouatta palliata associated with the availability of big trees and fruit of top food taxa. Am J Primatol 71:654–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellwanger N, Gould L (2011) Variations in behavioural patterns between Lemur catta groups living in different forest types: implications for conservation. Endanger Species Res 14:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. FAO (2015) Global forest resources assessment. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  29. Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, Peres CA, Bradshaw CJ, Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Sodhi NS (2011) Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. González-Zamora A, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Chaves ÓM, Sánchez-López S, Stoner KE, Riba-Hernández P (2009) Diet of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in Mesoamerica: current knowledge and future directions. Am J Primatol 71:8–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hanya G (2004) Seasonal variations in the activity budget of Japanese macaques in the coniferous forest of Yakushima: Effects of food and temperature. Am J Primatol 63:165–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hédl R, Svátek M, Dančák M, Rodzay AW, Salleh AB, Kamariah AS (2009) A new technique for inventory of permanent plots in tropical forests: a case study from lowland dipterocarp forest in Kuala Belalong, Brunei Darussalam. Blumea 54:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hemingway C, Bynum N (2005) The influence of seasonality on primate diet and ranging. In: Brockman D, van Schaik C (eds) Seasonality in primates: studies of living and extinct human and non-human primates. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Herrera-Montes A, Brokaw N (2010) Conservation value of tropical secondary forest: a herpetofaunal perspective. Biol Conserv 143:1414–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hill DA, Agetsuma N (1995) Supra-annual variation in the influence of Myrica rubra fruit on the behavior of a troop of Japanese macaques in Yakushima. Am J Primatol 35:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lambert JE (1998) Primate digestion: interactions among anatomy, physiology, and feeding ecology. Evol Anthropol 7:8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lim N-TL, Giam XL, Byrnes G, Clements GR (2013) Occurrence of the Sunda colugo (Galeopterus variegatus) in the tropical forests of Singapore: a Bayesian approach. Mamm Biol 78:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lucas PW, Corlett RT (1991) Relationship between the diet of Macaca fascicularis and forest phenology. Folia Primatol 57:201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meijaard E (2016) The role of landscape mosaics in primate conservation. In: Wich SA, Marshall AJ (eds) An introduction to primate conservation. University Oxford Press, Oxford, pp 205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Oates JF (1987) Food distribution and foraging behaviour. In: Eisenberg JF, Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Strushsaker TT, Crockett CM (eds) Primate societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 197–209Google Scholar
  42. Peres CA (1994) Primate responses to phenological changes in an Amazonian terra firme forest. Biotropica 26:98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pozo-Montuy G, Serio-Silva JC, Chapman CA, Bonilla-Sánchez YM (2013) Resource use in a landscape matrix by an arboreal primate: evidence of supplementation in black howlers (Alouatta pigra). Int J Primatol 34:714–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sha CM, Hanya G (2013a) Diet, activity, habitat use, and ranging of two neighboring groups of food-enhanced long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Am J Primatol 75:581–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sha CM, Hanya G (2013b) Temporal food resource correlates to the behavior and ecology of food-enhanced long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Mamm Study 38:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sodhi NS, Posa MRC, Lee TM, Bickford D, Koh LP, Brook BW (2010) The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 19:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tesfaye D, Fashing PJ, Bekele A, Mekonnen A, Atickem A (2013) Ecological flexibility in Boutourlini’s blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis boutourlinii) in Jibat Forest, Ethiopia: a comparison of habitat use, ranging behavior, and diet in intact and fragmented forest. Int J Primatol 34:615–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner IM, Boo CM, Wong YK, Chew PT, Ibrahim A (1996) Freshwater swamp forest in Singapore, with particular reference to that found around the Nee Soon firing ranges. Gard Bull Singapore 48:129–157Google Scholar
  49. Tutin CE (1999) Fragmented living: behavioural ecology of primates in a forest fragment in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon. Primates 40:249–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. USA National Phenology Network (USA-NPN) National Coordinating Office (2012) USA-NPN plant and animal phenophase definitions. USA-NPN technical series 2012-004. http://www.usanpn.org. Accessed 25 May 2017
  51. van Schaik CP, Terborgh JW, Wright SJ (1993) The phenology of tropical forests: adaptive significance and consequences for primary consumers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:353–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wallace RB (2006) Seasonal variations in black-faced black spider monkey (Ateles chamek) habitat use and ranging behavior in a southern Amazonian tropical forest. Am J Primatol 68:313–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wong YK, Chew PT, Ibrahim A (1994) The tree communities of the central catchment nature reserve, Singapore. Gard Bull Singapore 46:37–78Google Scholar
  54. Yee ATK, Corlett RT, Liew SC, Tan HTW, Wong KM, Leong-Škorničková J, Lee S, Low YW (2011) The vegetation of Singapore-an updated map. Gard Bull Singapore 63:205–221Google Scholar
  55. Yee ATK, Chong KY, Neo L, Tan HT (2016) Updating the classification system for the secondary forests of Singapore. Raff Bull Zool 32:11–21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer Japan KK 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Chih Mun Sha
    • 1
  • Siew Chin Chua
    • 2
  • Ping Ting Chew
    • 3
  • Hassan Ibrahim
    • 3
  • Hock Keong Lua
    • 3
  • Tze Kwan Fung
    • 4
  • Peng Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Sociology and AnthropologySun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Ridge View Residential CollegeNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.National Parks BoardSingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.School of Biological SciencesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations