, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 479–484 | Cite as

Comparison of the social systems of primates and feral horses: data from a newly established horse research site on Serra D’Arga, northern Portugal

  • Monamie Ringhofer
  • Sota Inoue
  • Renata S. Mendonça
  • Carlos Pereira
  • Tetsuro Matsuzawa
  • Satoshi Hirata
  • Shinya Yamamoto
News and Perspectives


Horses are phylogenetically distant from primates, but considerable behavioral links exist between the two. The sociality of horses, characterized by group stability, is similar to that of primates, but different from that of many other ungulates. Although horses and primates are good models for exploring the evolution of societies in human and non-human animals, fewer studies have been conducted on the social system of horses than primates. Here, we investigated the social system of feral horses, particularly the determinant factors of single-male/multi-male group dichotomy, in light of hypotheses derived from studies of primate societies. Socioecological data from 26 groups comprising 208 feral horses on Serra D’Arga, northern Portugal suggest that these primate-based hypotheses cannot adequately explain the social system of horses. In view of the sympatric existence of multi- and single-male groups, and the frequent intergroup transfers and promiscuous mating of females with males of different groups, male–female relationships of horses appear to differ from those of polygynous primates.


Polygyny Single-male/multi-male dichotomy Society Group-living animals Sexual conflict 



The field observations complied with the guidelines for animal studies in the wild of the Wildlife Research Center of Kyoto University, Japan. Special thanks are due to the municipality of Viana do Castelo for supporting our project. We are grateful to Agostinho Costinha, the director of Descubra Minho, Lourenço Almada of the Associação O Caminho do Garrano, and the villagers in Montaria for their support during our stay. The study was financially supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS core-to-core CCSN and JSPS-U04 to T. M., KAKENHI Nos. 15H01619, 15H05309, and 17H05862 to S. Y.) and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT No. 16H06283 to T. M.).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10329_2017_614_MOESM1_ESM.doc (2.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 2642 kb)


  1. Álvares F (2011) Wolf ecology and conservation in northwest Portugal. PhD thesis in biology (conservation biology), University of Lisbon (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  2. Asa CS (1986) Sexual behavior of mares. In: Crowell Davis SL, Houpt KA (eds) The veterinary clinics of North America: equine practice, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 519–534Google Scholar
  3. Bowling AT, Touchberry RW (1990) Parentage of Great Basin feral horses. J Wildl Manage 54:424–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron EZ, Linklater WL, Stafford KJ, Minot EO (2003) Social grouping and maternal behaviour in feral horses (Equus caballus): the influence of males on maternal protectiveness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:92–101Google Scholar
  5. Cameron EZ, Setsaas TH, Linklater WL (2009) Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:13850–13853CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1977) Primate ecology and social organization. J Zool 183:1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Waal FB (2003) Silent invasion: Imanishi’s primatology and cultural bias in science. Anim Cogn 6:293–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodloe RB, Warren RJ, Osborn DA, Hall C (2000) Population characteristics of feral horses on Cumberland Island, Georgia and their management implications. J Wildl Manage 64:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gray ME, Cameron EZ, Peacock MM, Thain DS, Kirchoff VS (2012) Are low infidelity rates in feral horses due to infanticide? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:529–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Imanishi K (1953) Social life of semi-wild horses in Toimisaki. Annu Anim Psychol 3:11–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kappeler PM, van Schaik CP (2002) Evolution of primate social systems. Int J Primatol 23:707–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Linklater WL (2000) Adaptive explanation in socio-ecology: lessons from the Equidae. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75:1–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ (2000) Tests for cooperative behaviour between stallions. Anim Behav 60:731–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Marjamäki PH, Contasti AL, Coulson TN, McLoughlin PD (2013) Local density and dispersal in a polygynous mammal. Ecol Evol 3:3073–3082CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsuzawa T, McGrew WC (2008) Kinji Imanishi and 60 years of Japanese primatology. Curr Biol 18:R587–R591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mills DS, McDonnell SM (2005) The domestic horse: the origins, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitani JC, Gros-Louis J, Manson JH (1996) Number of males in primate groups: comparative tests of competing hypotheses. Am J Primatol 38:315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Monard AM, Duncan P, Boy V (1996) The proximate mechanisms of natal dispersal in female horses. Behaviour 133:1095–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morais J, Oom MM, Malta-Vacas J, Luís C (2005) Genetic structure of an endangered Portuguese semiferal pony breed, the Garrano. Biochem Genet 43:347–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nunn CL (1999) The number of males in primate social groups: a comparative test of the socioecological model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ringhofer M, Yamamoto S (2017) Domestic horses send signals to humans when they are faced with an unsolvable task. Anim Cogn 20:397–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Stevens EF (1990) Instability of harems of feral horses in relation to season and presence of subordinate stallions. Behaviour 112:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tomonaga M, Kumazaki K, Camus F, Nicod S, Pereira C, Matsuzawa T (2015) A horse’s eye view: size and shape discrimination compared with other mammals. Biol Lett 11:20150701. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0701 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Schaik CP, Hörstermann M (1994) Predation risk and the number of adult males in a primate group: a comparative test. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Schaik CP, Kappeler PM (1997) Infanticide risk and the evolution of male–female association in primates. Proc Biol Sci 264:1687–1694CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer Japan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Intercultural StudiesKobe UniversityKobeJapan
  2. 2.Wildlife Research CenterKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Primate Research InstituteKyoto UniversityInuyamaJapan
  4. 4.Université Paris III Sorbonne NouvelleParisFrance
  5. 5.Institute for Advanced StudyKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  6. 6.Japan Monkey CentreInuyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations