Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 49–59 | Cite as

The effect of urban and rural habitats and resource type on activity budgets of commensal rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in Bangladesh

  • M. Firoj Jaman
  • Michael A. Huffman
Original Article

Abstract

Macaques are characterized by their wide distribution and ability to adapt to a variety of habitats. Activity budgets are affected by habitat type, season, and food availability in relation to differing age–sex class and individual requirements. We conducted a comparative study on two commensal rhesus groups, one living in a rural village and the other in the center of urban Dhaka, Bangladesh. The study was conducted in three different seasons between 2007 and 2009 in order to evaluate how habitat type and season affects their behavioral activities. Differences in food type and its availability between these two habitats were mainly responsible for the variations in activity budgets between groups. Feeding time in the rural group was significantly longer than that in the urban group. In contrast, grooming and object manipulation/play were significantly greater in the urban than the rural group. Seasonal variations in all major behaviors were significantly affected by group, with more time spent feeding in summer than in winter/dry season, and more time spent grooming and moving in winter/dry season than summer in the rural group. In contrast, time spent resting was greater in the monsoon and summer seasons than the winter/dry season in the urban group. Grooming time was greater in the winter/dry season than the monsoon and summer seasons. In both groups, immature of both sexes spent significantly more time on feeding and object manipulation/playing and less time resting than adults. Adult females spent more time grooming than males and immatures, of both sexes, in both groups. Moreover, the rural group spent most of their time feeding on garden/crop produce and wild plant food resources, while the urban group spent more time feeding on provisioned foods. These results showed that differences in the activity budgets of rural and urban dwelling macaques were due largely to the differences in available food resources. Commensal rhesus macaques show a high degree of behavioral flexibility in response to habitat and resource variability, and knowledge of these differences is important for the conservation and management of highly commensal primates.

Keywords

Habitat effect Resource type Rural and urban group Behavioral activity Rhesus macaque 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Wildlife Circle of the Forest Department, Ministry of Environment of Bangladesh Government, for giving us permission to conduct this study. We are grateful to Sadhona Pharmaceutical Co. for permission to conduct observations on their property. We are most grateful to Dr. Jean-Baptist Leca for his suggestion regarding statistical analysis and Drs. A. Mori, K. Watanabe, T. Furuichi, C. Hashimoto, Y. Tsuji, and other faculty of the Department of Ecology and Social Behavior, PRI, for their critical comments and suggestions during the research period. This study was supported in part by a Graduate Studies Scholarship “Monbukagakusho” (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan) to M.F.J.. We thank the HOPE Project, a core-to-core program sponsored by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), for providing travel funds to Bangladesh to carry out research between the 2007 and 2010 field visits. Our sincere thanks to Dr. M. Zashim Uddin and the Herbarium of the Botany Department, University of Dhaka, for identifying all of the plant species. Special thanks are also due to the Meteorological Department in Agargaon, Dhaka, for providing us with meteorological data for the study period. We are grateful to Mrs. D. Roy, D. Shah, M. Islam, and M. Hossain for assistance in the field. Finally, we express our sincere gratitude to Professor S. U. Sarker for his guidance and many helpful recommendations during the fieldwork.

References

  1. Agetsuma N (2001) Relation between age–sex classes and dietary selection of wild Japanese monkeys. Ecol Res 16:759–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agetsuma N, Nakagawa N (1998) Effects of habitat differences on feeding behaviors of Japanese monkeys: comparison between Yakushima and Kinkazan. Primates 39:275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed J, Elias SM (1988) Socio-economic study of winter maize in some selected areas of Bangladesh. J Rural Dev (Bangladesh) 18:60–68Google Scholar
  4. Akter T (2002) Ecology and behavior of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) at Charmuguria (Masters thesis). Jahangir Nagar University, SavarGoogle Scholar
  5. Altmann SA (1962) A field study of the sociobiology of rhesus monkeys. Ann N Y Acad Sci 102:338–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baulu J, Redmond DE (1980) Social and nonsocial behaviors of sex- and age matched enclosed and free ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Folia Primatol (Basel) 34:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bean A (1999) Ecology of sex differences in great ape foraging. In: Lee PC (ed) Comparative primate socioecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 339–362Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein IS, Mason WA (1963) Activity patterns of rhesus monkeys in a social group. Anim Behav 11:455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan EJ, Else JG, Altmann J (1985) Ecology and behaviour of a pest primate: vervet monkeys in a tourist lodge habitat. Afr J Ecol 23:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciani AC (1986) Intertroop agonistic behavior of a feral rhesus macaque troop ranging in town and forested areas in India. Aggress Behav 12:433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciani AC, Chiarelli B (1988) Age and sex differences in the feeding strtategies of a free ranging population of Macaca mulatta Zimmerman, 1788 (Primates: Cercopithecidae), in Simla (India). Monit Zool Italy 22:171–182Google Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH (1977) Some aspect of intraspecific variation in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology. Academic, London, pp 539–556Google Scholar
  14. Dunbar RIM (1992) A model of the gelada socio-ecological system. Primates 33(1):69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El Alami A, ELS VAN Lavieren EV, Rachida A, Chait A (2012) Differences in activity budgets and diet between semiprovisioned and wild-feeding groups of the endangered Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) in the Central High Atlas Mountains, Morocco. Am J Primatol 74(3):210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fa JE (1986) Use of time and resources by provisioned troops of monkeys: social behavior, time and energy in the Barbary macaque (Mcaca sylvanus L.) at Gibraltar (Contrib Primatol 23). Karger, BasleGoogle Scholar
  17. Forthman-Quick DL (1986) Controlling primate pests: the feasibility of conditioned taste aversion. In: Taub DM, King FA (eds) Current perspectives in primate social dynamics. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 252–273Google Scholar
  18. Goldstein SJ, Richard AF (1989) Ecology of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in northwest Pakistan. Int J Primatol 10:531–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halle S, Stenseth NC (2000) Introduction. In: Halle S, Stenseth NC (eds) Activity patterns in small mammals: an ecological approach. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanya G (2003) Age differences in food intake and dietary selection of wild male Japanese macaques. Primates 44:333–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanya G (2004) Seasonal variation in the activity budget of Japanese macaques in the coniferous forest of Yakushima: effects of food and temperature. Am J Primatol 63:165–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill DA (1997) Seasonal variation in the feeding behavior and diet of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata yakui) in lowland forest of Yakushima. Am J Primatol 43:305–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill CM, Webber AD (2010) Perceptions of non-human primates in human–wildlife conflict scenarios. Am J Primatol 72:909–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaman MF, Huffman MA (2008) Enclosure environment affects the activity budgets of captive Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Am J Primatol 70:1133–1144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jaman MF, Huffman MA (2010) Age class differences in the feeding strategies of captive Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) in a forested enclosure. Zoo Biol 30(3):260–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kamal K, Boug A, Brain P (1997) Effects of food provisioning on the behavior of commensal Hamadryas baboons, Papio hamadryas, at Al Hada Mountains in Western Saudi Arabia. Mammalia 14:11–22Google Scholar
  27. Kamilar JM, Pokempner AA (2008) Does body mass dimorphism increase male–female dietary niche separation? A comparative study of primates. Behaviour 145:1211–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kurup GU, Kumar A (1993) Time budget and activity patterns of the lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus). Int J Primatol 14:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lata K (1980) Impact of urban environment on the development of cognitive behaviour in rhesus monkeys (Ph.D. thesis). Meerut University, MeerutGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindburg DG (1971) The rhesus monkey in north India: an ecology and behaviour study. In: Rosenblum LA (ed) Primate behaviour: developments in the field and laboratory research, vol 1. Academic, New York, pp 83–104Google Scholar
  31. Lindburg DG (1973) Grooming behavior as a regulator of social interactions in rhesus monkeys. In: Carpenter CR (ed) Behavioral regulators of behavior in primates. Bucknell University Press, Lewisburg, pp 124–148Google Scholar
  32. Lyles AM, Dobson AP (1988) Dynamics of provisioned and unprovisioned primate populations. In: Fa JE, Southwick CH (eds) Ecology and behavior of food-enhanced primate groups. Alan R. Liss Inc., New York, pp 167–198Google Scholar
  33. Malik I, Southwick CH (1988) Feeding behavior and activity patterns of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) at Tughlaqabad, India. In: Southwick CH, Fa JE (eds) Ecology and behavior of food-enhanced primate groups. Alan R. Liss Inc., New York, pp 95–112Google Scholar
  34. Marriott BM (1988) Time budgets of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a forest habitat in Nepal and on Cayo Santiago. In: Ecology and behavior of food-enhanced primate groups, vol 11. Alan R. Liss, Inc, New York, pp 125–149Google Scholar
  35. Martin P, Bateson P (1993) Measuring behavior: an introductory guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maruhashi T (1981) Activity patterns of a troop of Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata yakui) on Yakushima Island, Japan. Primates 22:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitchell G (1979) Behavioral sex differences in nonhuman primates. Van Nostrad and Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Mori A (1979) Analysis of population changes by measurement of body weight in the Koshima troop of Japanese macaques. Primates 20:371–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mourshed M (2011) The impact of the projected changes in temperature on heating and cooling requirements in buildings in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Appl Energy 88:3737–3746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nakagawa N (1989) Activity budget and diet of Patas monkeys in Kala Maloue National Park, Cameroon: a preliminary report. Primates 30:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nakayama Y, Matsuoka S, Watanuki Y (1999) Feeding rates and energy deficits of Juvenile and adult Japanese monkeys in a cool temperate area with snow coverage. Ecol Res 14:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. National Research Council (2003) Nutrient requirements of nonhuman primates, 2nd edn. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Oppenheimer JR, Akonda AW, Husain KZ (1983) Rhesus monkeys: effect of habitat structure, human contact and religious beliefs on population size. In: Seth PK (ed) Perspectives on primate biology. Today’s & Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers, New Delhi, pp 193–199Google Scholar
  44. Passamani M (1998) Activity budget of Geoffroy’s marmoset (Callithrix geoffroyi) in an Atlantic forest in southeastern Brazil. Am J Primatol 46:333–340Google Scholar
  45. Paterson JD, Wallis J (2005) Commensalism and conflict: the primate–human interface. American Society of Primatologists, NormanGoogle Scholar
  46. Pirta RS (1984) Cooperative behaviour in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) living in urban and forest areas. I. Genesis. In: Roonwal ML, Mohnot SM, Rathore NS (eds) Current primate research. University of Jodhpur Press, Jodhpur, pp 271–283Google Scholar
  47. Radhakrishna S, Huffman MA, Sinha A (2012) The macaque connection: cooperation and conflict between humans and macaques (Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects, vol 43). Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Richard AF, Goldstein SJ, Dewar RE (1989) Weed macaques: the evolutionary implications of macaque feeding ecology. Int J Primatol 10:569–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saj T, Sicotte P, Paterson JD (1999) Influence of human food consumption on the time budget of vervets. Int J Primatol 20:977–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seth PK, Seth S, Chopra PK, Reddy (1989) Behavioural phylogeny of rhesus monkeys in India. In: Seth PK, Seth S (eds) Perspectives on primate biology, vol 3. Today’s & Tomorrow’s Printers, New Delhi, pp 219–243Google Scholar
  51. Seth PK, Chopra PK, Seth S (2001) Indian rhesus macaque: habitat, ecology and activity patterns of naturally occurring populations. ENVIS Bull Wildl Prot Areas 1(1):68–80Google Scholar
  52. Shukla AK (1979) Activity patterns in the rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) (research proceedings). Department of Anthropology, University of New Delhi, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  53. Siddiqi MF, Southwick CH (1980) Food habits of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in the north India plains. Proc Zool Soc Calcutta 31:53–61Google Scholar
  54. Smith CC (1977) Feeding behavior and social organization in howling monkeys. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology. Academic, New York, pp 97–126Google Scholar
  55. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry, 2nd edn. WH Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Soumah G, Yokota N (1991) Female rank and feeding strategies in a free-ranging provisioned troop of Japanese macaques. Folia Primatol 57:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Southwick CH, Teas J, Richie T, Taylor H (1982) Ecology and behavior of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in Nepal. Nat Geogr Soc Res Rep 14:619–630Google Scholar
  58. Teas J, Taylor H, Richie T, Southwick CH (1975) Nepal rhesus studies: ecological influences on the behavior of rhesus monkeys in Kathmandhu Valley (Progress Reports of the National Geographic Society). National Geographic Society, Washington, DC (unpublished)Google Scholar
  59. Vasey N (2005) Activity budgets and activity rhythms in red ruffed lemurs (Varecia rubra) on the Masoala Peninsula, Madagascar: seasonality and reproductive energetics. Am J Primatol 66:23–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Waser P (1977) Feeding, ranging and group size in the mangabey, Cercocebus albigena. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology. Academic, London, pp 183–222Google Scholar
  61. Watanuki Y, Nakayama Y (1993) Age difference in activity pattern of Japanese monkeys: effects of temperature, snow and diet. Primates 34(4):419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wolf LD (2002) Rhesus macaques: a compressive study of two sites, Jaipur in India and Silver Spring, Florida, vol 8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 87–93Google Scholar
  63. Yotsumoto N (1976) The daily activity rhythm in a troop of wild Japanese monkey. Primates 17(2):183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Social Behavior, Primate Research InstituteKyoto UniversityInuyamaJapan
  2. 2.Wildlife Biology and Protected Area Management Section, Department of ZoologyUniversity of DhakaDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations