Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 179–182 | Cite as

Nonaggressive interventions by third parties in conflicts among captive Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus)

  • Tomoyuki TajimaEmail author
  • Hidetoshi Kurotori
Short Communication

Abstract

Whereas orangutans are regarded as semisolitary animals in the wild, several studies have reported frequent social interactions, including aggression, among orangutans in captivity. As yet, there is a lack of knowledge about how they cope with aggression. In this report, we provide a number of new observations of interventions by third parties in aggressive interactions within a captive group of Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Tama Zoological Park, Japan. We observed that an adult female and a juvenile male orangutan intervened in aggressive interactions. The victim was a newly introduced juvenile female who was unrelated to anyone in the zoo. The ways in which the orangutans intervened were not aggressive, as the interveners simply aimed to separate the opponents, and these interventions did not lead to further aggression in almost every case. Our observations suggest that third parties can play an important role in managing aggressive conflicts among captive orangutans and, under conditions in which orangutans share limited space, nonaggressive interventions by third parties for settling conflicts appear. It is possible that orangutans may actively promote the peaceful coexistence of other individuals.

Keywords

Pongo pygmaeus Captive group Third-party intervention Nonaggressive intervention 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was permitted by the Tama Zoological Park. We thank the director, Mr. Toshimitsu Doi, and the staff: Ms. Mika Shimizu, Ms. Miwa Kosaka, and Ms. Takako Akikawa, for their kind support. We also thank Prof. Juichi Yamagiwa, Drs. Naofumi Nakagawa, Shohei Takeda, Noko Kuze, and Nobuyuki Kutsukake for their supervision and comments. Ms. Saika Yamazaki and Mr. Yuki Hanazuka helped us a great deal and we truly appreciate it. This work was supported in part by Global COE program A06 to Kyoto University from MEXT, Japan. The authors thank the editor, Prof. Nishida, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on this manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MPEG 14125 kb)

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aureli F, Cords M, van Schaik CP (2002) Conflicts resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework. Anim Behav 64:325–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Waal FBM, Harcourt AH (1992) Coalitions and alliances: a history of ethological research. In: Harcourt AH, de Waal FBM (eds) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  4. Delgado RA, van Schaik CP (2000) The behavioral ecology and conservation of the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus): a tale of two islands. Evol Anthropol 9:201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards SD, Snowdon CT (1980) Social behavior of captive, group-living orangutans. Int J Primatol 1:39–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flack JC, de Waal FBM, Krakauer DC (2005) Social structure, robustness, and policing cost in a cognitively sophisticated species. Am Nat 165(5):126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuze N, Malim TP, Kohshima S (2005) Developmental changes in the facial morphology of the Borneo orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus): possible signals in visual communication. Am J Primatol 65:353–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. MacKinnon J (1974) The behavior and ecology of wild orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Anim Behav 22:3–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Petit O, Thierry B (2000) Do impartial interventions in conflicts occur in monkeys and apes? In: Aureli F, de Waal FBM (eds) Natural conflict resolution. University of California Press, London, pp 267–269Google Scholar
  10. Preuschoft S, Wang X, Aureli F, de Waal FBM (2002) Reconciliation in captive chimpanzees: a reevaluation with controlled methods. Int J Primatol 23:29–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sicotte P (1995) Interpositions in conflicts between males in bimale groups of mountain gorillas. Folia Primatol 65:14–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yamagiwa J (1987) Intra- and inter-group interactions of an all-male group of Virunga mountain gorillas (Gorilla gorilla beringei). Primates 28:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zucker EL (1987) Control of intragroup aggression by a captive male orangutan. Zoo Biol 6:219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Human Evolution Studies, Graduate School of ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Tama Zoological ParkTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations