Advertisement

Primates

, 51:79 | Cite as

Third-party grooming in a captive chimpanzee group

  • Yvan I. RussellEmail author
Short Communication

Abstract

Social grooming is ubiquitous among the captive chimpanzees at Chester Zoo. Seven individuals were chosen here for a study of third-party social dynamics. The grooming decisions of five adult males were analysed, but only insofar as they directed attention to a mother–daughter pair. Uniquely, the daughter was an unpopular and physically disabled subadult whose congenital motor impairments prevented her from grooming others effectively. The impetus for this study was the observation that some males increased their grooming towards the disabled daughter during days when the mother had a tumescent anogenital swelling (sexually attractive to males) compared to days when the mother was not tumescent (less attractive). Apparently, males were grooming the daughter with no possibility of payback (because the daughter could never “return the favour”). A “grooming rate” (avg. grooming time/hour) was calculated that showed the grooming efforts of all five males towards both mother and daughter. These rates were compared on days when (1) the mother’s anogenital swelling was tumescent, and (2) days when the swelling was not tumescent. Each male showed a different pattern of behaviour. Two males groomed the daughter significantly more when the mother was tumescent. Results for all males were graphed against the quality of the social relationship between each male and the mother. Apparently, only males that had a weaker relationship to the mother groomed the daughter more when the mother was tumescent. This pattern did not exist for males with a stronger relationship to the mother. Possibly, the insecure males were using the disabled daughter as a way to curry favour with the attractive mother. If this is confirmed, then this type of triadic situation is a possible setting for indirect reciprocity to occur.

Keywords

Chimpanzee Grooming Oestrus Disability Indirect reciprocity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

For comments on an earlier version, I thank Robin Dunbar and Augusto Montiel-Castro. For help at Chester Zoo, I thank Clare Caws, Aiden Keane, Matt McLennan, Stephanie Wehnelt, Niall Ormerod, and Sonya Hill.

References

  1. Aharon I, Etcoff N, Ariely D, Chabris CF, O’Connor E, Breiter HC (2001) Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron 32:537–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett L, Henzi SP, Weingrill T, Lycett JE, Hill RA (2000) Female baboons do not raise the stakes but they give as good as they get. Anim Behav 59:763–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. de Waal FBM (1997) The chimpanzee’s service economy: food for grooming. Evol Hum Behav 18:375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deschner T, Heistermann M, Hodges K, Boesch C (2004) Female sexual swelling size, timing of ovulation, and male behaviour in wild West African chimpanzees. Horm Behav 46:204–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunbar RIM (1991) Functional significance of social grooming in primates. Folia Primatol 57:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hammerstein P (2003) Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. MIT Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Hopkins BL, Herman JA (1977) Evaluating interobserver reliability of interval data. J Appl Behav Anal 10:121–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hutchins M, Barash P (1976) Grooming in primates: implications for its utilitarian function. Primates 17:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Itani J, Suzuki A (1967) The social unit of chimpanzees. Primates 8:355–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keverne EB, Martensz ND, Tuite B (1989) Beta-endorphin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of monkeys are influenced by grooming relationships. Psychoneuroendocrino 14:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koyama NF, Caws C, Aureli F (2006) Interchange of grooming and agonistic support in chimpanzees. Int J Primatol 27:1293–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McGregor PK (2005) Animal communication networks. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Nishida T (1997) Sexual behavior of adult male chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates 38:379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pérez A, Vèa JJ (1998) Cost-benefit analysis of allogrooming behaviour in primates II. Primate Rep 50:15–37Google Scholar
  15. Russell YI (2007) Reputations and polyadic interactions among great apes (Ph.D. thesis). University of Liverpool, LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  16. Tanaka I, Takefushi H (1993) Elimination of external parasites (lice) as the primary function of grooming in free-ranging Japanese macaques. Anthropol Sci 101:187–193Google Scholar
  17. Yerkes RM, Elder JH (1936) The sexual and reproductive cycles of chimpanzee. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 22:276–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.British Academy Centenary Research Project, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, School of Social SciencesBrunel UniversityUxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations