Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

How many for dinner? Recruitment and monitoring by glances in capuchins

  • 163 Accesses

  • 20 Citations

Abstract

Group members present physical and physiological differences according to their age, sex or social status, which could generate motivation differences among individuals during travel. In spite of these divergences of interest among individuals, the group succeeds more often than not in making a collective decision about departure time and which direction to take. To reach a consensus decision, animals should exchange information relating to characteristics of group movement through different communication channels. The main purpose of this study is to understand the function of behaviour patterns displayed during movements of white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). We designed experiments in which we provoked collective movements involving a binary choice. During experiments, a video camera recorded the behaviour of each capuchin, which enabled us to determine which individuals displayed a behavioural pattern during travel and how this behaviour influenced the other group members. We found that looking backwards seemed to permit the recruitment of group mates during collective movement. This behaviour also seemed to allow the quantification of the number of followers, since the emitter modified its locomotion speed according to this number. In this preliminary study, we showed that visual behaviour was used to recruit and monitor group mates during collective movements and provided information on mechanisms involved in maintaining cohesion and coordination among group members during travel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–266

  2. Boinski S (1993) Vocal coordination of group movement among white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus. Am J Prim 30:85–100

  3. Boinski S, Campbell AF (1995) Use of trill vocalizations to coordinate troop movement among white-faced capuchins: a second field test. Behaviour 132:875–901

  4. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland

  5. Carpenter CR (1934) A field study of the behaviour and social relations of howling monkeys. Comp Psychol Monogr 48:1–168

  6. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456

  7. Hall KRL, DeVore I (1965) Baboon social behaviour. In: DeVore I (ed) Primate behaviour: field studies of monkeys and apes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 53–110

  8. Harcourt AH (1979) Social relationships between adult male and female mountain gorillas in the wild. Anim Behav 27:325–342

  9. Ingmanson EJ (1996) Tool-using behaviour in wild Pan paniscus: social and ecological considerations. In: Russon AE, Bard K, Taylor S (eds) Reaching into thought: the minds of great apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 190–210

  10. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  11. Kummer H (1968) Social organization of hamadryas baboons. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  12. Leca JB, Gunst N, Thierry B, Petit O (2003) Distributed leadership in semifree-ranging white-faced capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 66:1035–1044

  13. Mehlman PT (1996) Branch shaking and related displays in wild Barbary macaques. In: Fa JE, Lindburg DG (eds) Evolution and ecology of macaque societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 503–526

  14. Menzel EW Jr (1971) Communication about the environment in a group of young chimpanzees. Folia Primatol 15:220–232

  15. Meunier H, Leca JB, Deneubourg JL, Petit O (2006) Group movement decisions in capuchin monkeys: the utility of an experimental study and a mathematical model to explore the relationship between individual and collective behaviours. Behaviour 143:1511–1527

  16. Moglich M, Maschwitz U, Holldobler B (1974) Tandem running: a new kind of signal in ant communication. Science 186:1046–1047

  17. Robinson JG (1979) Vocal regulation of use of space by groups of titi monkeys (Callicebus moloch). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:1–15

  18. Schaller G (1963) The mountain gorilla: ecology and behaviour. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  19. Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

  20. Struhsaker TT (1967) Auditory communication among vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aetthiops). In: Altmann SA (ed) Social communication among primates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 281–324

  21. de Vries H (1995) An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Anim Behav 50:1375–1389

  22. de Vries H (1998) Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review. Anim Behav 55:827–843

  23. deVries H, Netto WJ, Hanegraaf PLH (1993) MatMan: a program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices. Behaviour 125:157–175

  24. Waser PM (1977) Individual recognition, intragroup cohesion and intergroup spacing: evidence from sound playback to forest monkeys. Behaviour 60:28–74

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Louis Pasteur University Primate Centre, Strasbourg, France, and to Pierre Uhlrich for technical support for the experiments. We also thank Arianna De Marco for determining the hierarchy of this group, Bernard Thierry for statistical advice and Guillaume Salmon for his help collecting some of the data. H.M. appreciates helpful comments and discussion with Pau Molina-Vila. J.L.D. is a research associate sponsored by the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research. We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on the manuscript. We wish to thank Ruth Knowles for English corrections on the manuscript. Observations and experiments were made in accordance with the CNRS guidelines.

Author information

Correspondence to Hélène Meunier.

About this article

Cite this article

Meunier, H., Deneubourg, J. & Petit, O. How many for dinner? Recruitment and monitoring by glances in capuchins. Primates 49, 26–31 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-007-0055-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Recruitment
  • Monitoring
  • Visual communication
  • Cebus capucinus
  • Collective movement