Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 253–267 | Cite as

Do age- and sex-related variations reliably reflect body size in non-human primate vocalizations? A review

  • E. Ey
  • D. Pfefferle
  • J. Fischer
Review Article

Abstract

In vocal communication, the mechanisms of sound production are well understood. The length of the vocal folds determines the minimum fundamental frequency, while the size and the shape of the vocal tract affect its filtering characteristics and hence, the resonant frequencies. Both measures—vocal fold length and vocal tract length—are related to body size and therefore, acoustic features are expected to vary with body size. Because direct measures of body size are difficult to obtain from free-ranging animals, age and sex have often been used as proxies. We surveyed studies which included direct measures of size or weight, and also studies in which only age and/or sex differences were examined. The main purpose was to examine whether age- and sex-related variations in acoustic features meet the predictions generated from our knowledge about sound production. Our survey revealed that compared to smaller animals, larger animals utter longer calls, with a lower fundamental frequency, with smaller formant dispersion, and with the energy concentrated in lower frequencies. Age and sex reliably reflect the influence of body size on acoustic features when gross size differences are examined. However, within age- and sex classes, this relationship may break down. In addition to body size, other factors such as internal state or social context may also influence the structure of vocal signals and highlight the richness of information in calls that is potentially available to listeners.

Keywords

Primates Sound production Body size Age Sex 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments and advice on early drafts of the manuscript.

References

  1. Abitol J, Abitol P, Abitol B (1999) Sex hormones and the female voice. J Voice 13:424–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amir O, Kishon-Rabin L (2002) The effect of oral contraceptives on voice. Preliminary observations. J Voice 16:267–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amir O, Kishon-Rabin L (2004) Association between birth control pills and voice quality. Laryngoscope 114:1021–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball JM, Rahilly J (1999) Phonetics: the science of speech. Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar
  5. Benade AH (1990) Fundamentals of musical acoustics. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulet MJ, Oddens BJ (1996) Female voice changes around and after the menopause—an initial investigation. Maturitas 23:15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castro NA, Snowdon CT (2000) Development of vocal responses in infant cotton-top tamarins. Behaviour 137:629–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins SA (2000) Men’s voices and women’s choices. Anim Behav 60:773–780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elowson AM, Snowdon CT, Sweet CJ (1992) Ontogeny of trill and J-call vocalizations in the pygmy marmoset, Cebuella pygmaea. Anim Behav 43:703–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fant G (1960) Acoustic theory of speech production. Mouton, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  11. Fichtel C, Kappeler PM (2002) Anti-predator behavior of group-living Malagasy primates: mixed evidence for a referential alarm call system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:262–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer J (2002) Developmental modifications in the vocal behaviour of nonhuman primates. In: Ghazanfar AA (ed) Primate audition: behaviour and neurobiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 109–125Google Scholar
  13. Fischer J, Hammerschmidt K, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2001) Acoustic features of female Chacma baboon barks. Ethology 107:33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer J, Hammerschmidt K, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2002) Acoustic features of male baboon loud calls: influence of context, age and individuality. J Acoust Soc Am 111(3):1465–1474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer J, Kitchen DM, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2004) Baboon loud calls advertise male quality: acoustic features and their relation to rank, age, and exhaustion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitch WT (1997) Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. J Acoust Soc Am 102(2):1213–1221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitch WT (2003) Primate vocal production and its implication for auditory research. In: Ghazanfar AA (ed) Primate audition ethology and neurobiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 87–103Google Scholar
  18. Fitch WT, Hauser MD (1995) Vocal production in non-human primates—acoustics, physiology, and functional constraints on honest advertisement. Am J Primatol 37(3):191–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitch WT, Hauser MD (2003) Unpacking “honesty”: vertebrate vocal production and the evolution of acoustic signals. In: Simmons AM, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Animal communication. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–137Google Scholar
  20. Ford SM, Davis LC (1992) Systematics and body size: implications for feeding and adaptation in New World monkeys. Am J Phys Anthropol 88:415–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gautier J-P (1998) La communication acoustique chez les primates. Bull Soc Zool Fr 123(3):239–253Google Scholar
  22. González J (2004) Formant frequencies and body size of speaker: a weak relationship in adult humans. J Phon 32:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gouzoules H, Gouzoules S (1989) Design features and developmental modification of pigtail macaque, Macaca nemestrina, agonistic screams. Anim Behav 37:383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammerschmidt K, Fischer J (1998) The vocal repertoire of Barbary macaques: a quantitative analysis of a graded signal system. Ethology 104(3):203–216Google Scholar
  25. Hammerschmidt K, Fischer J (2006) Constraints in primate vocal production. In: Griebel U, Oller K (eds) The evolution of communicative creativity: from fixed signals to contextual flexibility. MIT Press, Cambridge (in press)Google Scholar
  26. Hammerschmidt K, Todt D (1995) Individual-differences in vocalizations of young Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus)—a multi-parametric analysis to identify critical cues in acoustic signals. Behaviour 132:381–399Google Scholar
  27. Hammerschmidt K, Ansorge V, Fischer J (1994) Age-related variations in the vocal repertoire of Barbary macaques. In: Roeder JJ, Thierry B, Anderson JR, Herrenschmidt N (eds) Current primatology. Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, pp 287–295Google Scholar
  28. Hammerschmidt K, Newman JD, Champoux M, Suomi SJ (2000) Changes in rhesus macaque ‘coo’ vocalizations during early development. Ethology 106(10):873–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hammerschmidt K, Freundstein T, Jürgens U (2001) Vocal development in squirrel monkeys. Behaviour 138:1179–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris TR, Fitch WT, Goldstein LM, Fashing PJ (2006) Black and white colobus monkey (Colobus guereza) roars as a source of both honest and exaggerated information about body mass. Ethology 112:911–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hauser MD (1989) Ontogenic changes in the comprehension and production of vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops) vocalizations. J Comp Psychol 103(2):149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hauser MD (1993) The evolution of nonhuman primate vocalizations—effects of phylogeny, body weight, and social context. Am Nat 142(3):528–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Inoue M (1988) Age gradations in vocalization and body weight in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata). Folia Primatol 51:76–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson SE (2003) Life history and the competitive environment: trajectories of growth, maturation, and reproductive output among Chacma baboons. Am J Phys Anthropol 120:83–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liebermann P, Blumstein SE (1988) Speech physiology, speech perception, and acoustic phonetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Lieblich AK, Symmes D, Newman JD, Shapiro M (1980) Development of the isolation peep in laboratory-bred squirrel monkeys. Anim Behav 28:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller CT, Scarl J, Hauser MD (2004) Sensory biases underline sex differences in tamarin long call structure. Anim Behav 68:713–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitani JC, Groslouis J (1995) Species and sex-differences in the screams of chimpanzees and bonobos. Int J Primatol 16(3):393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitani JC, Stuht J (1998) The evolution of non-human primate loud calls: acoustic adaptation for long-distance transmission. Primates 39(2):171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Norcross JL, Newman JD (1993) Context and gender-specific differences in the acoustic structure of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) phee calls. Am J Primatol 30(1):37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Norcross JL, Newman JD, Cofrancesco LM (1999) Context and sex differences exist in the acoustic structure of phee calls by newly-paired common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Am J Primatol 49(2):165–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Owren MJ, Linker DC (1995) Some analysis methods that may be useful to acoustic primatologists. In: Zimmermann E, Newman DJ, Jürgens U (eds) Current topics in primate vocal communication. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  43. Pfefferle D (2003) Akustische Charakteristika als zuverlässige Anzeiger der Körpermasse—eine Untersuchung an Mantelpavianen (Papio hamadryas). Diplomthesis, Leipzig UniversityGoogle Scholar
  44. Pfefferle D, Fischer J (2006) Sound and size—identification of variables that reflect body size in Hamadryas baboons, Papio hamadryas. Anim Behav 72:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pistorio AL, Vintch B, Wang X (2006) Acoustic analyses of vocal development in a New World primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). J Acoust Soc Am 120(3):1655–1670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reetz H (1999) Artikulatorische und akustische Phonetik. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, TrierGoogle Scholar
  47. Rendall D (2003) Acoustic correlates of caller identity and affect intensity in the vowel-like grunt vocalizations of baboons. J Acoust Soc Am 113(6):3390–3402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rendall D, Owren MJ, Weerts E, Hienz RD (2004) Sex differences in the acoustic structure of vowel-like grunt vocalizations in baboons and their perceptual discrimination in baboons listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 115(1):411–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rendall D, Kollias S, Ney C, Lloyd P (2005) Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry. J Acoust Soc Am 117(2):944–955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Riede T, Fitch TW (1999) Vocal tract length and acoustics of vocalization in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). J Exp Biol 202:2859–2867PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rowe N (1996) The pictorial guide to the living primates. East Hampton, Pogonias Pr, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Seyfarth RM, Cheney LD (1986) Vocal development in vervet monkeys. Anim Behav 34:1640–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Vervet monkey alarm calls: semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Anim Behav 28:1070–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snowdon CT (1988) Communication as a social interaction: its importance in ontogeny and adult behaviour. In: Todt D, Goedeking P, Symmes D (eds) Primate vocal communication. Springer, Berlin, pp 108–122Google Scholar
  55. Snowdon CT (1989) Vocal communication in New World monkeys. J Hum Evol 18:611–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sundberg J (1987) The science of the singing voice. Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalbGoogle Scholar
  57. Sundberg J (1991) The science of musical sounds. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Vehrencamp SL (2000) Handicap, index, and conventional signal elements of bird song. In: Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenqvist G (eds) Animal signals: signalling and signal design in animal communication. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, pp 277–300Google Scholar
  59. Wich SA, van der Post DJ, Heistermann M, Mohle U, van Hooff JARAM, Sterck EHM (2003) Life-phase related changes in male loud call characteristics and testosterone levels in wild Thomas langurs. Int J Primatol 24(6):1251–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zahavi A (2003) Indirect selection and individual selection in sociobiology: my personal views on theories of social behaviour. Anim Behav 65:859–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zuberbühler K (2000) Referential labelling in Diana monkeys. Anim Behav 59:914–927Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group Cognitive EthologyGerman Primate CentreGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations