Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 35–42 | Cite as

Forest stewardship council certificate for a group of planters in Vietnam: SWOT analysis and implications

  • Hai Thi Nguyen Hoang
  • Satoshi Hoshino
  • Shizuka Hashimoto
Original Article

Abstract

A group of smallholders in Vietnam has obtained Forest Stewardship Council certification (FSC) for their Acacia plantation forest. Although the certification aims to improve livelihoods via economic, social, and environmental benefits, there are concerns amongst smallholders regarding the outcomes from their certification decision as well as difficulties in maintaining the certification. This article assesses the benefits and challenges of forest management certification from the perspective of small household groups who have achieved FSC certification. The FSC has brought new opportunities for farmers, such as increased selling price and extended trade networks, but is also associated with significant obstacles such as high initial and annual surveillance audit fees, difficult paper work, and complicated procedures for selling wood. Additionally, the small size of the plantations and low expertise in forest management make it more difficult and costly for farmers to achieve certification. There is a heavy dependency on donors for financial and technical support. Because subsidies from organizations like the World Wide Fund for Nature Vietnam are unlikely to continue indefinitely, the benefit of certification for smallholders is uncertain. Feasible actions to increase the sustainability of the group are suggested, including increasing the responsibility of the group members, enhancing the awareness and capacity of the local people, and searching for additional support from other organizations and wood processing companies. From the macro level, a national forest stewardship council should be established so that the audit cost for certification would be reduced.

Keywords

Certification Forest management FSC Sustainable development 

References

  1. Araujo M, Kant S, Couto L (2009) Why Brazilian companies are certifying their forests? For Policy Econ 11:579–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auer MR (2012) Group forest certification for smallholders in Vietnam: an early test and future prospects. Hum Ecol 40:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bray DB, Pérez LM (2002) The rise of community forestry in Mexico: history, concepts, and lessons learned from twenty-five years of community timber production. Report to the Ford foundation, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  4. Cashore B, Stone M (2012) Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. For Policy Econ 18:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cubbage F, Diaz D, Yapura P, Dube F (2010) Impacts of forest management certification in Argentina and Chile. For Policy Econ 12:497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hain H, Ahas R (2007) Can forest certification improve forest management? Case study of the FSC-certified Estonian state forest management centre. Internat Forestry Rev 9:759–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Helms MM, Nixon J (2010) Exploring SWOT analysis—where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. J Strategy Manag 3:215–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Humphries SS, Kainer KA (2006) Local perceptions of forest certification for community-based enterprises. For Ecol Manage 235:30–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koller W, Lagan P (2007) Do certified tropical logs fetch a market premium? A comparative price analysis from Sabah, Malaysia. For Policy Econ 9:862–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kotler P (1988) Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation, and control. Prentice-Hall International Edition, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  11. Nguyen TQ (2007) Trends in forest ownership, forest resources tenure and institutional arrangements: are they contributing to better forest management and poverty reduction? Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper 14Google Scholar
  12. Nussbaum R, Simula M (2005) The forest certification handbook. Earthscan, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  13. Sugiura K, Yoshioka T, Inoue K (2012) Effects of acquiring FSC forest management certification for Japanese enterprises using SmartWood Audits. J Forestry Res 23:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tacconi L, Obidzinski K, Agung F (2004) Learning lessons to promote forest certification and control illegal logging in Indonesia. CIFOR publishcation, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Weihrich H (1999) Analysing the competitive advantages and disadvantages of Germany with the TOWS matrix—an alternative to Porter’s model. Eur Bus Rev 99:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhao J, Xie D, Wang D, Deng H (2011) Current status and problems in certification of sustainable forest management in China. Environ Manage 48:1086–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Forest Society and Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hai Thi Nguyen Hoang
    • 1
  • Satoshi Hoshino
    • 1
  • Shizuka Hashimoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Sustainable Rural Development, Graduate School of Global Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations