Advertisement

Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 432–437 | Cite as

Influence of using texture information in remote sensed data on the accuracy of forest type classification at different levels of spatial resolution

  • Tetsuji OtaEmail author
  • Nobuya Mizoue
  • Shigejiro Yoshida
Original Article

Abstract

We evaluated the influence of texture information from remote sensed data on the accuracy of forest type classification at different spatial resolutions. We used 4-m spatial resolution imagery to create five different sets of imagery with lower spatial resolutions down to 30 m. We classified forest type using spectral information alone, texture information alone, and spectral and texture information combined at each spatial resolution, and compared the classification accuracy at each resolution. The classification and regression tree method was used for classification. The accuracy of all three tests decreased slightly with lower spatial resolution. The accuracy with the combined data was generally higher than with either the spectral or texture information alone. At most resolutions, the lowest accuracy was with texture information alone. However, there was no clear difference in accuracy between the combined data and spectral data alone at 25- and 30-m spatial resolution. These results indicate that adding texture information to spatial information improves the accuracy of forest type classification from very high resolution (4-m spatial resolution) to medium resolution imagery (20-m spatial resolution), but this accuracy improvement does not appear to hold for relatively coarse resolution imagery (25- to 30-m spatial resolution).

Keywords

Forest classification Spatial resolution Texture Very high resolution imagery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (no. 2375) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

  1. Baatz M, Benz U, Dehghani S, Heynen M, Holtje A, Hofmann P, Lingenfelder I, Mimler M, Sohlbach M, Weber M, Willhauck G (2004) eCognition professional: user guide definiens-imaging. Definiens, MunichGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd DS, Danson FM (2005) Satellite remote sensing of forest resources: three decades of research development. Prog Phys Geogr 29:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth and Brooks, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  4. Castilla G, Hay GJ (2008) Image objects and geographic objects. In: Blaschke T, Lang S, Hay GJ (eds) Object-based image analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coburn CA, Roberts ACB (2004) A multiscale texture analysis procedure for improved forest stand classification. Int J Remote Sens 25:4287–4308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franklin SE (2001) Remote sensing for sustainable forest management. CRC, FloridaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franklin SE, Hall RJ, Moskal LM, Maudie AJ, Lavigne MB (2000) Incorporating texture into classification of forest species composition from airborne multispectral images. Int J Remote Sens 21:61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franklin SE, Wulder MA, Gerylo GR (2001) Texture analysis of IKONOS panchromatic data for Douglas-fir forest age class separability in British Columbia. Int J Remote Sens 22:2627–2632Google Scholar
  11. Gergel SE, Stange Y, Coops NC, Johansen K, Kirby KR (2007) What is the value of a good map? An example using high spatial resolution imagery to aid riparian restoration. Ecosystems 10:688–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hájek F (2006) Object-oriented classification of IKONOS satellite data for the identification of tree species composition. J For Sci 52:181–187Google Scholar
  13. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3:610–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ito T (2004) Forestry GIS. In: GIS Association of Japan (eds) The encyclopedia of geographical information science. Asakura, Tokyo, pp 138–139 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  15. Katoh M (2004) Classifying tree species in a northern mixed forest using high-resolution IKONOS data. J For Res 9:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kayitakire F, Hamel C, Defourny P (2006) Retrieving forest structure variables based on image texture analysis and IKONOS-2 imagery. Remote Sens Environ 102:390–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly M, Meentemeyer RK (2002) Landscape dynamics of the spread of Sudden Oak Death. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68:1001–1009Google Scholar
  18. Lozano FJ, Suárez-Seoane S, Kelly M, Luis E (2008) A multi-scale approach for modeling fire occurrence probability using satellite data and classification trees: a case study in a mountainous Mediterranean region. Remote Sens Environ 112:708–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lu D, Weng Q (2007) A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int J Remote Sens 28:823–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murakami T (2004) Seasonal variation in classification accuracy of forest-cover types examined by a single band or band combinations. J For Res 9:211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murakami T (2006) How is short-wave infrared (SWIR) useful to discrimination and classification of forest types in warm temperate region? J For Plan 12:81–85Google Scholar
  22. Murata I, Saruki S, Kubota K, Inoue S, Tashiro N, Enoki T, Utsumi Y, Inoue S (2009) Effects of sika deer (Cervus nippon) and dwarf bamboo (Sasamorpha borealis) on seedling emergence and survival in cool-temperate mixed forests in the Kyushu Mountains. J For Res 14:296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ozdemir I, Norton DA, Ozkan UY, Mert A, Senturk O (2008) Estimation of tree size diversity using object oriented texture analysis and aster imagery. Sensors 8:4709–4724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rao PVN, Sesha Sai MVR, Sreenivas K, Rao MVK, Rao BRM, Dwivedi RS, Venkataratnam L (2002) Textural analysis of IRS-1D panchromatic data for land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens 23:3327–3345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salajanu D, Olson CE (2001) The significance of spatial resolution: identifying forest cover from satellite data. J For 99:32–38Google Scholar
  26. Tuominen S, Pekkarinen A (2005) Performance of different spectral and textural aerial photograph features in multi-source forest inventory. Remote Sens Environ 94:256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wulder M (1998) Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Prog Phys Geogr 22:449–476Google Scholar
  28. Wunderle AL, Franklin SE, Guo X (2009) Age class estimation of western red cedar using SPOT-5 pan-sharpened imagery in British Columbia, Canada. Geocarto Int 24:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yu Q, Gong P, Clinton N, Biging G, Kelly M, Schirokauer D (2006) Object-based detailed vegetation classification with airborne high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72:799–811Google Scholar
  30. Zhang C, Franklin SE, Wulder MA (2004) Geostatistical and texture analysis of airborne-acquired images used in forest classification. Int J Remote Sens 25:859–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations