Asia Europe Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 241–252 | Cite as

EU-Asia Free Trade Agreements as tools for social norm/legislation transfer

Original Paper

Abstract

Article 21 of the Treaty of Lisbon mandates the European Union (EU) to foster its values (democracy, the rule of law, social rights, gender equality, etc.) in its external relations. The core concern of the EU’s multi-faceted relations with Asia is economic relations with rising markets. EU relations with the region have focused on the facilitation of trade and investment through the negotiation of free trade agreements (FTAs) with a number of Asian partners. EU FTAs are accompanied by a Political Cooperation Agreement (PCA), which links core EU values to trade through the ‘standard clause’, whereby under certain circumstances, human rights’ abuses can trigger a suspension of trade preferences. Using a qualitative case study methodology, and drawing on policy documents and interviews, this paper addresses the question of whether, and how, the EU can balance its internal legal obligations with its economic interests and its partners’ demands. The article provides a legal background of the EU’s obligations in terms of international value promotion. It then reviews EU trade policy strategies and reveals an absence of a concerted approach to the inclusion of values. The article investigates the sources of resistance to EU attempts at linking its trade policy with broader values including social rights with Asian partners. The analysis reveals that Asian resistance is centred on the legalistic approach of the EU rather than the values and suggests that a more effective norm export might be achieved through other means. The article concludes that the EU’s failure to push forward social issues in FTAs ultimately casts serious doubts about the EU’s international ‘actorness’ in the area of social rights.

References

  1. Aggestam L (2008) Introduction: ethical power Europe? Int Aff 84(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allwood G, Guerrina R, MacRae H (2013) Unintended consequences of EU policies: reintegrating gender in European studies. Women's Stud Int Forum 39:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bain J, Masselot A (2013) Gender equality law and identity building for Europe. Canterbury Law Rev 18:99–120Google Scholar
  4. Bossuyt F (2009) The social dimension of the new generation of EU free trade agreements with Asia and Latin America: ambitious continuation for the sake of policy coherence. Eur Foreign Aff Rev 14(5):703–742Google Scholar
  5. Chaban N, Kelly S, Holland M (2015) Perceptions of ‘Normative Power Europe’ in the shadow of the Eurozone debt crisis: public perspectives on European integration from the Asia Pacific. The value of gender equality in the EU-Asian Trade Policy: an assessment of the EU’s ability to implement its own legal obligations. In: Björkdahl A, Chaban N, Leslie J, Masselot A (eds) Importing EU Norms? Conceptual framework and empirical findings. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London p 57–77Google Scholar
  6. Cuyvers L, Kerremans B (eds) (1998) The international social issue. Social dumping and social competition in the global economy. Intersentia ECONOMISCHE Wetenschappen, AntwerpenGoogle Scholar
  7. Elgström O (2007) Outsiders’ perceptions of the European Union in International Trade Negotiations. J Common Mark Stud 45(4):949–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eriksen EO (2006) The EU—a cosmopolitan polity? J Eur Public Policy 1(2):252–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission (2006) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 4 October 2006 “Global Europe: Competing in the world”. COM(2016) 567Google Scholar
  10. European Economic and Social Committee (ECOSOC) (2011) Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on The role of civil society in the free trade agreement between the EU and India. REX/316 EESC-2011-1612, Brussels, 27.10.2011Google Scholar
  11. European Parliament (2011) European Parliament Resolution of 11 May 2011 on the State of Play in the EU-India Free Trade Agreement Negotiations, Strasbourg, N. P7_TA_PROV (2011) 0224Google Scholar
  12. Garcia M (2013) From idealism to realism: EU preferential trade agreement policy. J Contemp Eur Res 9(4):521–541Google Scholar
  13. Garcia M, Masselot A (2015) The value of gender equality in the EU-Asian trade policy: an assessment of the EU’s ability to implement its own legal obligations. In: Björkdahl A, Chaban N, Leslie J, Masselot A (eds) Importing EU norms? Conceptual framework and empirical findings. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London, p 191–209Google Scholar
  14. Hafner-Burton E (2005) Trading human rights: how preferential trade agreements influence government repression. Int Organ 59(3):593–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyde-Price A (2006) Normative power Europe: a realist critique. J Eur Public Policy 13(2):217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaber N (2004) Globalisation, labour standards and women’s rights: dilemmas of collective (in) action in an interdependent world. Fem Econ 10(1):3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khorana S, Garcia M (2013) European Union-India negotiations: one step forward, one step back. J Common Mark Stud 51(4):684–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolben K (2006) The new politics of linkage: India’s opposition to the workers’ rights clause. Indiana J Glob Leg Stud 13:225–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Langan M (2012) Normative power Europe and the moral economy of Africa–EU ties. New Polit Econ 7(3):243–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lightfoot S, Burchell J (2005) The European Union at the world summit on sustainable development: normative power Europe in action. J Common Mark Stud 43(1):75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manners I (2002) Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? J Common Mark Stud 40(2):235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manners I (2006) The European Union as a normative power: a response to Thomas Diez. Millennium J Int Stud 35(1):167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manners I (2008) The normative ethics of the European Union. Int Aff 84(1):45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manners I, Whitman R (2003) The ‘difference engine’: constructing and representing the international identity of the European Union. J Eur Public Policy 10(3):380–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGuire S, Lindeque J (2010) The diminishing returns to trade policy in the European Union. J Common Mark Stud 48(5):1329–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohlin B (1956) Social aspects of european economic co-operation: report by a group of expert. Int Labour Rev 102Google Scholar
  27. Orbie J et al (2005) EU trade policy and a social clause: a question of competences? Polit Eur 3(17):159–187Google Scholar
  28. Orbie J, Khorana S (2015) Normative versus market power Europe? The EU-India trade agreement. Asia Europe Journal. doi:10.1007/s10308-015-0427-9 z
  29. Schimmelfennig F (2001) The community trap: liberal norms, rhetorical actions, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union. Int Organ 55(1):47–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shen W (2015) ‘The EU’s Promotion of Human Rights: the case of Tibet’. In: Björkdahl A, Chaban N, Leslie J, Masselot A (eds) Importing EU norms? Conceptual framework and Empirical findings. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London, p 231–246Google Scholar
  31. Spaak P-H (1956) Intergovernmental Committee on European Integration. The Brussels Report on the General Common Market (abridged, English translation of document commonly called the Spaak Report) [June 1956]. Available online: http://aei.pitt.edu/995/ Accessed 08 June 2014
  32. Van Roozendaal G (2002) Trade unions and global governance. The debate on a social clause. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Vogler J, Stephen H (2007) The European Union in global environmental governance: leadership in the making? Int Environ Agreements 7:389–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Whitman R (ed) (2011) Normative power Europe: empirical and theoretical perspectives. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  35. Youngs R (2004) Normative dynamics and strategic interests in the EU’s external identity. J Common Mark Stud 42(2):415–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases

  1. C-270/97 Deutsche Post /Sievers & Schrage [2000] ECR I-929Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BathBathUK
  2. 2.University of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations