Asia Europe Journal

, Volume 12, Issue 1–2, pp 179–197 | Cite as

Chinese investment and European labor: should and do workers fear Chinese FDI?

Original Paper

Abstract

The rapid increase in Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) into Europe raises important questions about the implications of such for workers and organized labor in Europe: (1) does Chinese FDI flow more or less to regulated labor markets than do other investment sources?; (2) what are the strategies of works councilors and union representatives in dealing with real or expected investment from China?; and (3) how do individual workers view the propriety of Chinese FDI given China’s low-wage, labor-unfriendly profile in the global economy? Quantitative and qualitative data on Chinese FDI, individual opinions about China and globalization, and on strategies of labor representatives provide some leverage to preliminarily answer these questions. First, Chinese FDI does not seem to be more (or less) focused on investing in the least regulated labor markets than other sources of FDI. Second, interviews with works councilors and union representatives in Germany, France and the Netherlands affirm a cautiously optimistic view of Chinese investors as no more or less threatening to organized labor than other investors. Third, analysis of attitudes about Chinese and European interests in managing globalization suggest that less-skilled, more vulnerable, pro-labor-union workers in Europe tend to be more rather than less enthusiastic about Chinese management than their fellow citizens. These patterns suggest a surprising, if tentative, embrace by workers and their representatives in Europe of that investment.

References

  1. Botero JC, Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2004) The regulation of labor. Q J Econ 119(4):1339–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgoon B, Raess D (2009) Globalization and working time: working hours and flexibility in Germany. Polit Soc 37(4):554–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgoon B, Raess D (2011) Does the global economy mean more sweat? Trade, investment, migration and working hours in Europe. Soc Econ Rev 9(4):699–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Checchi D, Lucifora C (2002) Unions and labour market institutions in Europe. Econ Policy 17(35):362–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Culem CG (1988) The locational determinants of direct investments among industrialized countries. Eur Econ Rev 32(4):885–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dörre K (1997) Globalisierung—eine strategische option. Internationalisierung von Unternehmen und industrielle Beziehungen in der Bundesrepublik. Indust Bezieh 4(4):265–290Google Scholar
  7. Eurobarometer 73.4. (2010 May). Survey and questionnaire. (ZA 5234/ICPSR)Google Scholar
  8. Eurostat (2012) European Union Direct Investments. Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS). Statistical Office of the Euroean Union. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_SDDS/EN/bop_fdi_esms.htm. Accessed October 2012)
  9. Financial Times (2012) “Huawei hullabaloo hides arrival of Chinese minnows,” October 10 (Simon Rabinovitch)Google Scholar
  10. Friedman J, Gerlowski DA, Silberman J (1992) What attracts foreign multinational corporations? Evidence from branch plant location in the United States. J Reg Sci (Heightstown) 32(4):403–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hakema J (2012) ‘Verbind Jezelf met China voordat het te laat is’. Uitgave van AON Nederland 2011/2 Google Scholar
  12. Hanemann T, Rosen DH (2012) China invests in Europe: patterns, impacts and policy implications. Rhodium Group. http://www.rhg.com
  13. Jensen NM (2006) Nation-states and the multinational corporation: a political economy of foreign direct investment. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Kädtler J, Sperling HJ (2002) Jenseits von Globalisierung und Finanzialisierung. Aushandlungsbeziehungen in der deutschen Chemie- und Automobilindustrie. Indust Bezieh 9(2):133–156Google Scholar
  15. Knoerich J (2010) Gaining from the global ambitions of emerging economy enterprises: an analysis of the decision to sell a German firm to a Chinese acquirer. J Int Manag 16(2):177–191Google Scholar
  16. Kucera D (1992) Effects of labor standards on labor costs and FDI flows. J Int Econ 33(1–2):57–76Google Scholar
  17. Kucera D (2002) Core labour standards and foreign direct investment. Int Labour Rev 141(1–2):31–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Looise JK, Drucker M (2003) Dutch works councils in times of transition: the effects of changes in society, organizations and work on the position of works councils. Econ Ind Democr 24(3):379–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mosley L (2011) Labor rights and multinational production. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. NPR (2011) “In Greek Port, Storm Brews Over Chinese-Run Labor,” June 8, (Louisa Lim)Google Scholar
  21. Oman C (2000) Policy competition for foreign direct investment: a study of competition among governments to attract FDI. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oskarsson S (2001) Class struggle in the wake of globalisation. Union organisation and economic integration. In: Magnusson L, Ottosson J (eds) Europe—one labour market? Peter Lang, Brussels, pp 193–238Google Scholar
  23. Raess D, Burgoon B (2006) The dogs that sometimes bark: globalization and works council bargaining in Germany. Eur J Ind Relat 12(3):287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodrik D (1996) Labor standards in international trade: do they matter and what do we do about them? In: Rodrik D, Lawrence R (eds) Emerging agenda for global trade: high stakes for devleoping countries. John Hopkins University Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Scheve K, Slaughter MJ (2004) Economic insecurity and the globalization of production. Am J Polit Sci 48(4):662–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmitt M (2003) Deregulation of the German industrial relations system via foreign direct investment: are the subsidiaries of anglo-saxon MNCs a threat for the institutions of industrial democracy in Germany? Econ Ind Democr 24(3):349–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scruggs L, Lange P (2002) Where have all the members gone? globalization, institutions, and union density. J Polit 64(1):126–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steenbergen MR, Jones BS (2002) Modeling multilevel data structures. Am J Polit Sci 218–237Google Scholar
  29. The Washington Post (2010) “Greece is tapping China’s deep pockets to help rebuild its economy,” June 9 (Anthony Faiola)Google Scholar
  30. Thelen K, Kume I (1999) The effects of globalization on labour revisited: lessons from Germany and Japan. Polit Soc 27(4):477–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wirtschaftswoche (2004) “Spur des Scheiterns,” September 30 (Harald Schumacher, Christian Schaudwet)Google Scholar
  32. Yin RK (1989) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations