Advertisement

Asia Europe Journal

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 215–230 | Cite as

Shipowners, ports and diplomats: the political economy of Greece’s relations with China

  • Asteris Huliaras
  • Sotiris Petropoulos
Original Paper

Abstract

The paper analyses Greece’s relations with China and highlights the crucial role of specific business interests in strengthening bilateral ties. Greek–Chinese political contacts, as well as trade, investment and touristic flows, have significantly increased in the last decade. The concession of the Piraeus port to the Chinese company COSCO was the major turning point for the relationship. The paper notes a strong influence of shipowning interests in Greece’s foreign policy decision-making system which has conditioned the development of Greek–Chinese relations.

Keywords

Foreign Policy Greek Government Boston Consult Group Chinese Trade Economic Diplomacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Disclaimer

Part of the research for this article has been funded from the European Commission, Jean Monnet Chair on EU Relations with the Less Developed World.

References

  1. Agnantopoulos A (2007) Greece and the Palestinian–Israeli conflict: a discursive-constructivist perspective. Μediterr Polit 12(3):359–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alden C, Aran A (2012) Foreign policy analysis, new approaches. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Alderman L (October 10, 2012) Under Chinese, a Greek port thrives, The New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  4. Andornino G (2012) The political economy of Italy’s relations with China. Int Spect 47(2):87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bank of Greece (2012) Report of the Bank of Greece. 2011Google Scholar
  6. Batzoglou F, Ertel M (2011) Chinese investors take advantage of Greek crisis. SpiegelOnlineGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumann R, Stengel F (2010) Globalization and foreign policy analysis: neglect of or successful adaptation to changing political practices? Paper presented in the 51st Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, New Orleans, February 2010Google Scholar
  8. Boston Consulting Group (2013) Impact assessment of the shipping cluster on the Greek economy & societyGoogle Scholar
  9. Brabant M (2008) Hu’s Greek trip focuses on trade. BBC NewsGoogle Scholar
  10. Breslin S (2004) Beyond diplomacy? UK relations with China since 1997. Br J Polit Int Relat 6:409–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breuning M (2007) Foreign policy analysis: a comparative introduction. Palgrave/Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coralluzzo V (2008) Italy’s foreign policy toward China: missed opportunities and new chances. J Mod Ital Stud 13(1):6–24Google Scholar
  13. Davidson L (2006) Privatizing foreign policy. Middle East Policy XIII(2):134–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dietrich JW (1999) Interest groups and foreign policy: Clinton and the China MFN debates. Pres Stud Q 29(2):280–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dokos T (2012) The geopolitical consequences of the Greek crisis. ELIAMEP Policy Papers 18Google Scholar
  16. Economic and Commercial Affairs Greek Office in Beijing (2011) Brief note on Greece–China bilateral commodities trade 2011Google Scholar
  17. Economides S (2005) The Europeanization of Greek foreign policy. West Eur Polit 28(2):471–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. European Monitoring Center on Change (2010) Piraeus port authority fact sheetGoogle Scholar
  19. Eurostat (2013) Various statisticsGoogle Scholar
  20. Everts P, Isernia P (2001) Public opinion and the international use of force. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Flynn D, Kyvrikosaios D (2008) With slump in world shipping, Greece has a lot to lose. International Herald TribuneGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox J, Godement F (2009) A power audit of EU-China relations. European Council on Foreign Relations, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Garten JE (1997) Business and foreign policy. Foreign Policy 76(3):67–79Google Scholar
  24. Georgantas E (2012) Hibous sur l’ eau, caisses à dragon: origins et dynamique du rapprochement sino-grec. Outre-Terre 1(31):333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Godement F (2008) China rising: can there be a European strategy? Korean J Def Anal 20(1):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greek Ministry of Merchant Marine Press Office (2006)Google Scholar
  27. Greek Ministry of Merchant Marine Press Office (2007)Google Scholar
  28. Greek Prime Minister Press Office (2006)Google Scholar
  29. Hope K (2011) Greek ship-owners miss China hand. Financial TimesGoogle Scholar
  30. Huliaras A (1990) The foreign policy of the Greek socialists (1981–1986): forces of continuity and change. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, The University of HullGoogle Scholar
  31. Huliaras A, Tsardanidis C (2006) (Mis)understanding the Balkans: Greek geopolitical codes of the post-communist era. Geopolit 11(3):465–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ioakimides PC (1999) The model of foreign policy-making in Greece: personalities vs institutions. In: Stavridis S et al (eds) The foreign policies of the European Union’s Mediterranean States and applicant countries in the 1990s. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacobs LR, Page BI (2005) Who influences US foreign policy? Am Polit Sci Rev 99(1):107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Joachim J, Dembinski M (2011) A contradiction in terms? NGOs, democracy and European foreign and security policy. J Eur Public Policy 18(8):1151–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Joint Communiqué between the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Greece on the Establishment of Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (2006)Google Scholar
  36. Kazamias A (1997) The quest for modernization in Greek foreign policy and its limitations. Μediterr Polit 2(2):71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keridis D (2001) Domestic developments and foreign policy. In: Keridis D, Triantaphyllou D (eds) Greek-turkish relations in the era of globalization. Brassey’s, EverettGoogle Scholar
  38. Kottakis M (2011) Karamanlis—off the record. Livanis, AthensGoogle Scholar
  39. Langhorne R (2005) The diplomacy of non-state actors. Dipl Statecraft 16:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lanteigne M (2009) Chinese foreign policy: an introduction. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee D (2004) The growing influence of business in UK diplomacy. Int Stud Perspect 5(1):50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lomagin N (2012) Interest groups in Russian foreign policy: the invisible hand of the Russian Orthodox Church. Int Polit 49:498–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCormick JM (2012) The domestic sources of American foreign policy: insights and evidence. Rowman and Littlefield, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  44. Melander I, Papachristou H (2010) China’s Wen offers to buy Greek debt. ReutersGoogle Scholar
  45. Moeller K (2002) Diplomatic relations and mutual strategic perceptions: China and the European Union. China Q 169:10–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Naixiao Z, Zhuoqi D (2012) The opportunities to Chinese enterprise in foreign direct investment during the period of Greek economic recovery. Int J Asian Bus Inf Manag 3(3):27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Narramore T (2008) China and Europe: engagement, multipolarity and strategy. Pac Rev 21(1):87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. OECD (2013) Various statisticsGoogle Scholar
  49. OJEU (2012), State Aid No SA.288876, 5 October.Google Scholar
  50. Panagopoulos A (2006) Prime Minister Karamanlis visits Shanghai, urges tightening of Greek-Chinese commercial ties. Athens News AgencyGoogle Scholar
  51. Papadimitriou C (2005) Trade with China Grows, I Kathimerini (English edition)Google Scholar
  52. Poulain L (2011) China’s new Balkan strategy. Central Europe Watch 1(2), Center for Strategic & International StudiesGoogle Scholar
  53. Psaraftis HN, Pallis AA (2012) Concession of the Piraeus container terminal: turbulent times and the quest for competitiveness. Marit Policy Man 39(1):27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rumelili B (2005) Civil society and the Europeanization of Greek–Turkish cooperation. South Eur Soc Polit 10(1):45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shambaugh D (2005) The new strategic triangle: US and European reactions to China’s rise. Wash Q 28(3):7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sklias P et al (2012) China’s economic diplomacy: a comparative approach to Sino–Greek and Sino–Turkish relations. Int J Bus Soc Sci 3(10):286–297Google Scholar
  57. Skordilis G (2007) Mr. Kefalogiannis sank at Tympaki. To VimaGoogle Scholar
  58. Stasinopoulos D (2012) China–Greece cooperation against the background of global economic and financial crisis. In: EU–China Observer. Department of EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies, College of Europe, BrugesGoogle Scholar
  59. The Economist (1997) Thoroughly modern mercantilists, pp. 21–3Google Scholar
  60. The Economist (2008) The Greeks and the Chinese: doing business for aeons. http://www.economist.com/node/11977024
  61. Tsardanidis C, Stavridis S (2005) The Europeanisation of Greek foreign policy: a critical appraisal. J Eur Integr 27(2):217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tsarouhas D (2009) The political economy of Greek–Turkish relations. Southeast Eur Black Sea Stud 9(1–2):39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Union of the Greek Shipowners (2012) Annual Report 2011–12Google Scholar
  64. Varadaraian L (2012) The domestic abroad: Diasporas in international relations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Wallace W, Josselin D (2002) Non-state actors in world politics. Palgrave-Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Webber M, Smith M (2002) Foreign policy in a transformed world. Prentice Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Zahariadis N (2005) Essence of political manipulation: emotions, institutions and Greek foreign policy. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International RelationsUniversity of the PeloponneseCorinthGreece

Personalised recommendations