Asia Europe Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 2–3, pp 91–97 | Cite as

The EU’s Asia: renegotiating boundaries, renegotiating norms

  • Bart GaensEmail author
  • Juha Jokela
  • Mikael Mattlin


The global financial crisis and the shift of economic strength to a rising Asia have ushered in European introspection and allusions to the decline of the European Union (EU). The EU’s ambitions to have a normative impact in the world have been called into question. The seven articles in this guest-edited issue explore processes of change relating to geopolitical definitions, regional actorness, interregionalism, and normative power within the framework of EU–Asia relations. This introduction contextualises the themes taken up in the different articles. It considers important divides in the recent history of Europe–Asia relations and outlines key transformations in the global environment, before critically reflecting on the significance of normative power for Europe.


European Union Global Financial Crisis International Criminal Court Global Governance European Union Member State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Behr T, Jokela J (2011) Regionalism and global governance: the emerging agenda. Notre Europe, JulyGoogle Scholar
  2. DG Trade (2005) Statistics for Asian ASEM countries. 5 JulyGoogle Scholar
  3. DG Trade (2007) Statistics for Asian ASEM countries. 24 AugustGoogle Scholar
  4. DG Trade (2012) Statistics for Asian ASEM countries. 10 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  5. Duchêne F (1972) Europe’s role in world peace. In: Mayne R (ed) Europe tomorrow: sixteen Europeans look ahead. Fontana, London, pp 32–47Google Scholar
  6. European Commission (1994) Towards a new Asia strategy. COM(94) 314 finalGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission (2001) Commission communication ‘Europe and Asia: a strategic framework for enhanced partnerships.’ Bulletin EU 9-2001 Asia (1/5)Google Scholar
  8. Eurostat (2010) News release. ASEM partners account for 45% of EU27 imports and 29% of exports. 1 October, 143/2010Google Scholar
  9. Hettne B (2007) Interregionalism and world order: the diverging EU and US models. In: Telò M (ed) European Union and new regionalism. Regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 107–123Google Scholar
  10. Khandekar G (2011) Asia as a geo-economic hub. In: Martiningui A, Youngs R (eds) Challenges for European foreign policy in 2012. What kind of geo-economic Europe? FRIDE, Madrid, pp 63–71Google Scholar
  11. Leonard M (2005) Why Europe will run the 21st century? Public Affairs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Manners I (2002) Normative Power Europe: a contradiction in terms. J Common Market Stud 40(2):235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Manners I (2008) The normative ethics of the European Union. Int Aff 84(1):65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahathir BM (2012) Europe must do ‘real’ business. BBC News. 7 February 2012. Accessed 27 February 2012
  15. Pollet-Fort A, Yeo LH (2012) EU–Asia trade relations: getting through the crisis. FRIDE, Agora Asia–Europe 2:1–6, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  16. Rüland J (2006) Interregionalism. An unfinished agenda. In: Hänggi H, Roloff R, Rüland R (eds) Interregionalism and international relations. Routledge, London, pp 295–313Google Scholar
  17. Söderbaum F, Van Langenhove L (2005) Introduction: the EU as a global actor and the role of interregionalism. Eur Integrat 27(3):249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. WTO (2011a) Press release. Trade growth to ease in 2011 but despite 2010 record surge, crisis hangover persists. Press/628, 7 AprilGoogle Scholar
  19. WTO (2011b) Press release. Asia is at leading edge of new trade pacts, says WTO report. Press/635, 27 JulyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Finnish Institute of International AffairsHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations