Asia Europe Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 57–73 | Cite as

Nuclear power for climate mitigation? Contesting frames in Korean newspapers

Original Paper

Abstract

Korea has been one of the most aggressive countries pursuing nuclear power expansion, ranking in the top five nations globally for the installation capacity of nuclear power plants, nuclear power generation, and the number of reactors in operation. Even after the Fukushima accident, the Korean government has made no policy changes in regards to nuclear power, and public support for nuclear power remains relatively high. This study focuses on the role of the mass media in representing the Korean government’s benefit-oriented nuclear frame and the persistence of public support in the country for nuclear power. The study further aims to answer the following questions: What kind of frame was mobilized by the mass media? What kinds of speakers were chosen by the media to represent a particular side to the issue? A total of three conservative, progressive, and business newspapers were analyzed. The benefits and/or risks of nuclear power in the context of climate change were major topics in the three newspapers. The benefit and risk frame constructed in these three newspapers was characterized as “slightly risky but significantly beneficial” in the conservative Chosun Daily and MK Business and “seemingly beneficial but intrinsically risky” in the progressive Hankyoreh. Different frames were contested in the three newspapers; however, because the influential power of Korean progressive newspapers is weak, arguments supporting the growth and benefits of nuclear power have become pervasive in Korea.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (NRF-2008-220-B00013).

References

  1. Allan S, Adam B, Carter C (2000) Introduction. In: Allan S, Adam B, Carter C (eds) Environmental risks and the media. Routledge, London, pp 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson A (1997) Media, culture and the environment. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  3. Boykoff M, Boykoff J (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US Prestige Press. Glob Environ Chang 14:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carvalho A (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science 16:223–243Google Scholar
  5. Corbett J, Durfee J (2004) Testing public (un)certainty of science: media representations of global warming. Sci Commun 26(2):129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doyle J (2011) Acclimatizing nuclear? Climate change, nuclear power and the reframing of risk in the UK news media. Int Commun Gaz 73(1–2):107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DTI (2006) The energy challenge: Energy Review Report 2006. http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file31890.pdf. Accessed 2 January 2012
  8. Gamson WA, Modigliani A (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Sociol 95(1):1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hallahan K (1999) Seven models of framing: implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 11(3):205–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IEA (2011) Key world energy statistics. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2011/key_world_energy_stats.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2011
  11. Jachtenfuchs M (1997) Conceptualizing European governance. In: Jorgensen K (ed) Reflective approaches to European governance. Macmillan, New York, pp 39–50Google Scholar
  12. Krosnick J, Holbrook A, Visser P (2000) The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American Public Opinion. Public Understanding of Science 9(3):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lovelock J (2007) The revenge of Gaia: Earth’s climate crisis and the fate of humanity. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Lynas M (2008) How nuclear power can save the planet. NewStatesman, 14 August 2008. http://www.newstatesman.com/environment/2008/08/lynas-climate-nuclear-coal. Accessed 8 September 2011
  15. McQuail D (1994) Mass communication theory: an introduction, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  16. Monbiot G (2008) The stakes could not be higher. Everything hinges on stopping coal. The Guardian, August 5, 2008. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/05/kingsnorthclimatecamp.climatechange. Accessed 8 September 2011
  17. Oh S-J (2008) A survey on consciousness of media audience. Korea Press Foundation, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  18. Olausson U (2009) Global warming global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science 18:421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Phillips N, Hardy C (2002) Understanding discourse analysis. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  20. Pidgeona NF, Lorenzonib I, Poortinga W (2008) Climate change or nuclear power: no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Glob Environ Chang 18(1):69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Poortinga W, Pidgeon N, Lorenzoni I (2006) Public perceptions of nuclear power, climate change and energy options in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted during October and November 2005, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Understanding Risk Working Paper 06-02Google Scholar
  22. Statistics Korea (2011) Social Indicators in Korea 2010. Retrieved 15 January 2012, from http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=245833
  23. Tankard J, Hendrickson L (1991) Media frames: approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, BostonGoogle Scholar
  24. The Journalist Association of Korea (2009) A special opinion survey of the 45th anniversary. http://www.journalist.or.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=21157. Accessed 18 August 2009
  25. Tuchman G (1978) Making news: a study in the construction of reality. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson K (1995) Mass media as sources of global warming knowledge. Mass Communication Review 22(1–2):75–89Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental StudiesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations