Advertisement

Asia Europe Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 2–3, pp 127–143 | Cite as

Comparing regional organisations in global multilateral institutions: ASEAN, the EU and the UN

  • Jens-Uwe Wunderlich
Original Paper

Abstract

Structural change brought about by the end of the Cold War and accelerated globalisation have transformed the global environment. A global governance complex is emerging, characterised by an ever-greater functional and regulatory role for multilateral organisations such as the United Nations (UN) and its associated agencies. The evolving global governance framework has created opportunities for regional organisations to participate as actors within the UN (and other multilateral institutions). This article compares the European Union (EU) and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as actors within the UN network. It begins by extrapolating framework conditions for the emergence of EU and ASEAN actorness from the literature. The core argument of this article is that EU and ASEAN actorness is evolving in two succinct stages: Changes in the global environment create opportunities for the participation of regional organisations in global governance institutions, exposing representation and cohesion problems at the regional level. In response, ASEAN and the EU have initiated processes of institutional adaptation.

Keywords

European Union United Nations Security Council Regional Organisation Global Governance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Prof. John Gaffney, Dr. Meera Warrier and Dr. Bart Gaens for comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Acharya A (2001) Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia–ASEAN and the problem of regional order. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggarwal VK, Chow JT (2010) The perils of consensus: how ASEAN’s meta-regime undermines economic and environmental cooperation. Rev Int Pol Econ 17(2):262–290Google Scholar
  3. Alagappa M (1993) Regionalism and the quest for security: ASEAN and the Cambodia conflict. J Int Aff 46(2):439–467Google Scholar
  4. Allen D, Smith M (1991) Western Europe’s presence in the contemporary international arena. In: Holland M (ed) The future of European political cooperation. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen D, Smith M (1998) The European Union’s security presence: barrier, facilitator or manager? In: Rhodes C (ed) The European Union in the world community. Lynne Rienner, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Asciutti E (2010) The ASEAN Charter: an analysis. Perspect Fed 2(1):43–46Google Scholar
  7. ASEAN (2003) Declaration of ASEAN Concord II. http://www.asean.org/15159.htm. Accessed 22 October 2011
  8. ASEAN (2006) ASEAN Bulletin. http://www.asean.org/18992.htm. Accessed 14 November 2011
  9. ASEAN (2007a) Memorandum of understanding between ASEAN and the UN on ASEAN–UN cooperation. http://www.asean.org/21918.pdf. Accessed 14 November 2011
  10. ASEAN (2007b) Media release — ASEAN leaders sign ASEAN Charter. http://www.aseansec.org/21085.htm. Accessed 1 December 2011
  11. ASEAN (2007c) The ASEAN Charter. http://www.aseansec.org/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2011
  12. ASEAN (2009) The ASEAN Secretariat. http://www.aseansec.org/22467.htm. Accessed 13 November 2011
  13. ASEAN (2010) ASEAN co-chair’s statement of the third ASEAN–UN summit. http://www.asean.org/25496.htm. Accessed 14 November 2011
  14. Ba AD (2009) Regionalism’s multiple negotiations: ASEAN in East Asia. Cambridge Rev Int Affairs 22(3):345–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bellamy AJ (2004) The pursuit of security in Southeast Asia: beyond realism. In: Beeson M (ed) Contemporary Southeast Asia — regional dynamics, national differences. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  16. Blavoukos S, Bourantonis D (2011) The EU’s performance at the United Nations Security Council. J Eur Int 33(6)Google Scholar
  17. Börzel TA, Risse T (2009) Diffusing (inter-)regionalism — the EU as a model of regional integration. KFG working paper 7, Kolleg-Forschergruppe ‘The transformative power of Europe’. http://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/en/v/transformeurope/publications/working_paper/WP_07_Boerzel_Risse.pdf. Accessed 2 December 2010
  18. Breslin S (2010) The EU and Asia within an evolving global order: what is Europe? Where is Asia? East Asia 27:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bretherton C, Vogler J (1999) The European Union as a global actor. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Caballero-Anthony M (2003) Regionalization of peace in Asia. Experiences and prospects of ASEAN, ARF and UN partnership. Working paper 42, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  21. Caballero-Anthony M (2009) Evolving regional governance in East Asia: from ASEAN to an East Asian community. In: Thomas N (ed) Governance and regionalism in Asia. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  22. Capie D (2010) When does track two matter? Structure, agency and Asian regionalism. Rev Int Pol Econ 17(2)Google Scholar
  23. Davidson PJ (2009) The role of law in governing regionalism in Asia. In: Thomas N (ed) Governance and regionalism in Asia. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  24. De Prado C (2010) Regions in the world: the EU and East Asia as foreign policy actors. Int Pol 47(3/4):355–370Google Scholar
  25. Doidge M (2008) Regional organizations as actors in international relations: interregionalism and asymmetric dialogues. In: Rüland J, Schubert G, Schucher G, Storz C (eds) Asian–European relations: building blocs for global governance? Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  26. ESCAP (2008) Striving together: ASEAN & the UN. UN Publication, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  27. Farrell M (2006) EU representation and coordination with the United Nations. In: Laatikainen KV, Smith KE (eds) The European Union at the United Nations: intersecting multilateralisms. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  28. Freistein K (2005) ASEAN after the Bali Summit 2003: from paralysis to new life? Eur J East Asian Studies 4(2):177–204Google Scholar
  29. Freistein K (2008) Beyond the taboos? The opportunities and limitations of Asian–Europe track-two dialogue. In: Rüland J, Schubert G, Schucher G, Storz C (eds) Asian–European relations: building blocs for global governance? Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  30. Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity: self and society in the later Modern age. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Haacke J (2003) ASEAN’s quiet diplomatic and security culture — origins, development and prospects. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Held D (1997) Democracy and globalization. MPIfG Working Paper 97/5. http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/workpap/wp97-5/wp97-5.html. Accessed 2 September 2011
  33. Held D, McGrew A (2002) The great globalization debate. In: Held D, McGrew A (eds) The global transformations reader — an introduction to the globalisation debate. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Held D, McGrew A (2007) Introduction. In: Held D, McGrew A (eds) Governing globalization: power, authority and global governance. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Held D, McGrew A, Goldblatt D, Perraton J (1999) Global transformations: politics, economics and culture. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Henderson J (1999) Reassessing ASEAN. Adelphi Paper 328. IISS, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Herrberg A (1997) The European Union in its international environment: a systematic analysis. In: Landau A, Whitman RC (eds) Rethinking the EU — institutions, interests and identities. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Hettne B (1996) Globalisation, the new regionalism and East Asia. In: Tanaka T, Inoguchi T (eds) Globalism and regionalism. United Nations University, Tokyo www.unu.edu/unupress/globalism.html. Accessed 9 August 2010
  39. Hettne B (2003) The New Regionalism Revisited. In: Söderbaum F, Shaw TM (eds) Theories of new regionalisms: a Palgrave reader. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  40. Hettne B (2007) Interregionalism and world order: the diverging EU and US models. In: Telò M (ed) European Union and new regionalism. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  41. Hettne B (2010) EU foreign policy: the interregional model. In: Söderbaum F, Stålgren P (eds) The European Union and the global South. Lynne Rienner, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  42. Hettne B (2011) The European Union as an emerging global actor. In: Wunderlich JU, Bailey DJ (eds) The European Union and global governance — a handbook. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Hettne B, Söderbaum F (2002) Theorizing the rise of regionness. In: Breslin S, Hughes CW, Phillips N, Rosamond B (eds) New regionalism and the global political economy: theories and cases. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Hettne B, Söderbaum F (2008) The future of regionalism: old divides, new frontiers. In: Cooper A, Hughes C, De Lombaerde P (eds) Regionalization and global governance — the taming of globalization. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Hill C (1993) The capability–expectations gap, or conceptualising Europe’s international role. J Common Mark Stud 31(3):305–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hill C (1998) Closing the capability–expectations gap? In: Petersen J, Sjursen H (eds) A common foreign and security policy for Europe? Competing visions for the CFSP. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Hill C, Smith M (2005) International relations and the European Union. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Jørgensen KE, Oberthür S, Shahin J (2011) Introduction: assessing the EU’s performance in international institutions — conceptual framework and core findings. J Eur Integr 33(6):599–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jupille J, Caporaso JA (1998) States, agency and rules: the EU in global environmental politics. In: Rhodes C (ed) The European Union in the world community. Lynne Rienner, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Katzenstein PJ (1996) Regionalism in comparative perspective. Arena working paper, WP 96/1. http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-publications/workingpapers/working-papers1996/wp96_1.htm. Accessed 5 December 2011
  51. Keohane R (1984) After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  52. Khoo H (2000) ASEAN as a ‘neighbourhood watch group’. Contemp Southeast Asia 22(2):279–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kim NK (2009) European experience for East Asian integration: ideas, national interests, and the international circumstance. Asia Eur J 7:295–312Google Scholar
  54. Kivimäki T (2008) Power, interest or culture — is there a paradigm that explains ASEAN’s political role best? Pac Rev 21(4):431–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kjær AM (2004) Governance. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Koenig-Archibugi M (2007) Mapping global governance. In: Held D, McGrew A (eds) Governing globalization: power, authority and global governance. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  57. Koutrakou VN (2011) European Union–United Nations cooperation in conflict and development. In: Wunderlich JU, Bailey DJ (eds) The European Union and global governance — a handbook. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Krasner SD (1983) International regimes. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  59. Kurus B (1994) The ASEAN triad: national interest, consensus-seeking and economic cooperation. Contemp Southeast Asia 16(4):404–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Laatikainen KV, Smith KE (2006) The European Union at the United Nations: intersecting multilateralisms. Palgrave, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lister FK (1984) Decision-making strategies for international organisations: the IMF model. Graduate School of International Studies, University of Denver, DenverGoogle Scholar
  62. Loder J, Montsion JM, Stubbs R (2011) East Asian regionalism and the European experience. In: Warleigh-Lack A, Robinson N, Rosamond B (eds) New regionalism and the European Union — dialogues, comparisons and new research directions. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  63. Manners I (2002) Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? J Common Mark Stud 40(2):235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McGrew A (2007) Globalization in hard times: contention in the academy and beyond. In: Ritzer G (ed) The Blackwell companion to globalization. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Morada NM (2008) ASEAN at 40: prospects for community building in Southeast Asia. Asia Pac Rev 15(1):36–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Narine S (2008) Forty years of ASEAN: a historical review. Pac Rev 21(4):411–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nischalke TI (2002) Does ASEAN measure up? Post-Cold War diplomacy and the idea of regional community. Pac Rev 15(1)Google Scholar
  68. Official Journal of the European Union (2010a) Consolidated version of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union, C83/47. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083:0047:0200:en:PDF. Accessed 5 December 2011
  69. Official Journal of the European Union (2010b) Consolidated version of the treaty on European Union, C83/13. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083:0013:0046:EN:PDF. Accessed 30 November 2011
  70. Peou S (1998) The subsidiarity model of global governance in the UN-ASEAN context. Glob Gov 4(4):439–459Google Scholar
  71. Pierson P (1998) The path to European integration: a historical-institutionalist analysis. In: Sandholtz W, Stone Sweet A (eds) European integration and supranational governance. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  72. Rittberger V, Zangl B, Staisch M (2006) International organisation: polity, politics and policies. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  73. Ritzer G (2007) Introduction. In: Ritzer G (ed) The Blackwell companion to globalization. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  74. Rosenau JN (2003) Distant proximities: dynamics beyond globalization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  75. Rosenau JN (2005) Global governance as disaggregated complexity. In: Ba AD, Hoffmann MJ (eds) Contending perspectives on global governance — coherence, contestation and world order. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosenau JN, Czempiel O (1992) Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rüland J (2011) Southeast Asian regionalism and global governance: ‘multilateral utility’ or ‘hedging utility’? Contemp Southeast Asia 33(1):83–112Google Scholar
  78. Scholte JA (2000) Globalization: a critical introduction. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  79. Sjöstedt G (1977) The external role of the European Community. Saxon House, FarnboroughGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith M (1996) The EU as an international actor. In: Richardson J (ed) European Union: power and policy-making. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  81. Söderbaum F, Sbragia A (2010) EU studies and the ‘new regionalism’: what can be gained from dialogue. J Eur Integr 32(6):563–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stubbs R (2008) The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions and the challenge of ‘global’ governance. Pac Aff 21(4):451–468Google Scholar
  83. Sukma R (1999) Security interdependence in Asia-Pacific — a view from Jakarta. Strategi 7:37–59Google Scholar
  84. Taylor P (2006) The EU in Geneva: coordinating policy in the economic and social arrangements of the United Nations system. Laatikainen KV, Smith KE (2006) The European Union at the United Nations: intersecting multilateralisms. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  85. Telò M (2005) European Union and new regionalism: regional actor and global governance in a post-hegemonic era. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  86. Telò M (2009) The European Union and global governance. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  87. Thakur R, Van Langenhove L (2006) Enhancing global governance through regional integration. Glob Gov 12(3):233–238Google Scholar
  88. Thakur R, Van Langenhove L (2008) Enhancing global governance through regional integration. In: Cooper A, Hughes C, De Lombaerde P (eds) Regionalization and global governance — the taming of globalization. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  89. United Nations General Assembly (1995) Declaration of the enhancement of cooperation between the United Nations and regional arrangements or agencies in the maintenance of international peace and security. A/RES/49/57, 17 February. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/UNRO%20SRES%2049%2057.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2011)
  90. United Nations General Assembly (2005) 2005 World Summit Outcome. A/RES/60/1, 24 October. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/UNRO%20ARES%2060%201.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2011
  91. United Nations General Assembly (2006) Observer status for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in the general assembly. A/RES/61/44, 18 December. http://www.aseansec.org/18992-2.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2011
  92. United Nations General Assembly (2011) General assembly, in recorded vote, adopts resolution granting European Union right of reply, ability to present oral amendments. GA/11079/Rev.1, 3 May. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/ga11079.doc.htm. Accessed 16 September 2011)
  93. United Nations Secretary General (1992) An agenda for peace: preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping, A/47/277-S/24111, 17 June. http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/agpeace.html. Accessed 15 September 2011
  94. United Nations Secretary General (2005) Conclusions of the chairman of the sixth high-level meeting between the United Nations and regional and other intergovernmental organisations. A/60/341, S2005/567, 25/ 26 July. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/UNRO%20S2005%20567.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2011
  95. United Nations Security Council (2005) resolution 1631 (2005), S/RES/1631, 17 October. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/UNRO%20SRES%201631.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2011
  96. United Nations Security Council (2010) 6257th meeting. S/PV/6257, 13 January. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/RO%20SPV%206257.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2011
  97. Van Langenhove L (2011) Building regions: the regionalization of the world order. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  98. Weatherbee D (2005) International relations in Southeast Asia: the struggle for autonomy. Rowman and Littlefield, LondonGoogle Scholar
  99. Whitman RG (1998) From civilian power to superpower? The international identity of the EU. Macmillian, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wunderlich JU (2007) Regionalism, globalization and international order, Europe and Southeast Asia. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  101. Wunderlich JU, Bailey DJ (eds) (2011) The European Union and global governance — a handbook. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  102. Young OR (1989) International cooperation: building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  103. Young OR (1999) Governance in world affairs. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  104. Young OR (2005) Regime theory and the quest for global governance. In: Ba AD, Hoffmann MJ (eds) Contending perspectives on global governance —coherence, contestation and world order. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aston Centre for Europe, School of Languages and Social SciencesAston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations