Advertisement

Phytothérapie

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 112–116 | Cite as

Cicatrisation par le miel, l’expérience de 25 années

  • B. Descottes
Formation Continue Clinique

Résumé

Le miel est reconnu comme un produit efficient dans la cicatrisation des plaies, principalement du fait de son rôle antibactérien, résultat du peroxyde d’hydrogène produit sous l’effet de la glucose-oxydase. De 1984 à 2009, nous avons traité 3 012 lésions infectées ou non, essentiellement au niveau de la paroi abdominale. Pour 33 kystes sacrococcygiens et 102 fermetures de stomie, l’application du miel est de principe, dès la fin de l’acte opératoire. La vitesse moyenne de cicatrisation variait de 21 jours, pour les plaies inférieures à 10 cm2, à 75 jours, pour les nécroses pariétales supérieures à 30 cm2. La cicatrisation a toujours été obtenue de façon esthétique. Les échecs ont été le fait de tissus radiothérapés (sein, rectum).

Mots clés

Abeille Miel Cicatrisation Plaie Peroxyde d’hydrogène 

Twenty-five years of experience in healing wounds with honey

Abstract

Honey is known as a successful product for healing wounds, mainly by the antibacterial effect of hydrogen peroxide produced by the enzyme glucose-oxidase. Between 1984 and 2009, we treated 3 012 lesions, both infected and uninfected mainly on the abdominal wall. For 33 sacral cysts and 102 stoma closures, honey was systematically applied immediately after the end of the operation. Wound healing varied from 21 days, for a lesion under 10 cm2, to 75 days, for necrotizing abdominal wall lesions of over 30 cm2. Wound healing was always aesthetically satisfactory except in cases where skin had been affected by radiotherapy.

Keywords

Bee Honey Wound Healing Hydrogen peroxide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographie

  1. 1.
    Adcock D (1962) The effect of catalase on the inhibine and peroxyde valves of various honeys. J Apic Res 1: 38–40Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bang LM (2003) The effect of dilution on the rate of hydrogen proxyde production in honey and its implications for wound healing. J Altern Complement Med 9: 267–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brudzynski K (2006) Effect of hydrogen peroxyde on antibacterial activities of Canadian honeys. Can J Microbial 52: 1228–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper RA (1999) Antibacterial activity of honey against strains of Staphylococcus aureus from infected wounds. J R Soc Med 92: 283–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molan PC (2001) Potential of honey in the treatment of wounds and borns. Am J Clin Dermatol 1: 13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mavno G (1975) The healing hand man an wound in the ancient world. Ma: Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moolenaar O (2006) The effect of honey compared to conventional treatment on healing of radiotherapy induced skin toxicity in breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 45: 623–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ransome HM (1937) The sacred bee in ancient times and folklore. G Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roth LA (1986) Use of a disc assay system to detect oxytetracycline residues in honey. J Food Prod 49: 436–441Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taormina PJ (2001) Inhibitory activity of honey against foodborne pathogens as influenced by the presence of hydrogen peroxyde and level of antiogydant power. Int J Food Microbial 69: 217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White JW (1963) The identification of inhibine, the antibacterial factor in honey, as hydrogen peroxyde and its origin in a honey glucose-oxydase system. Biochim Biophys Acta 73: 57–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Service de chirurgieCHU DupuytrenLimoges cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations