Advertisement

Systemic understanding of Lactococcus lactis response to acid stress using transcriptomics approaches

  • Zhengming Zhu
  • Peishan Yang
  • Zhimeng Wu
  • Juan ZhangEmail author
  • Guocheng Du
Genetics and Molecular Biology of Industrial Organisms - Short Communication
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

During fermentation, acid stress caused by the accumulation of acidic metabolites seriously affects the metabolic activity and production capacity of microbial cells. To elucidate the acid stress-tolerance mechanisms of microbial cells, we performed genome mutagenesis combined with high-throughput technologies to screen acid stress-tolerant strains. Mutant strain Lactococcus lactis WH101 showed a 16,000-fold higher survival rate than that of the parent strain after 5 h of acid shock at pH 4.0 and maintained higher ATP, NH4+, and intracellular pH (pHi) levels during acid stress. Additionally, comparative transcriptomics analysis revealed enhanced regulation of carbohydrate metabolism and sugar transport to provide additional energy, amino acid metabolism and transport to maintain pHi homeostasis and ATP generation, and fatty acid metabolism to enhance cellular acid tolerance. Moreover, overexpression of identified components resulted in 12.6- and 12.9-fold higher survival rates after acid shock for 3 h at pH 4.0 in L. lactis (ArcB) and L. lactis (MalQ) compared to the control strain, respectively. These findings provide valuable insight into the acid stress-response mechanisms of L. lactis and promote the further development of robust industrial strains.

Keywords

Lactococcus lactis High-throughput screening Acid stress Transcriptomics Metabolic engineering 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0308401), the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. 111-2-06), the Grant from Pioneer Innovative Research Team of Dezhou, the Open Project of Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University (KLIB-KF201706), and the National First-class Discipline Program of Light Industry Technology and Engineering (LITE2018-08).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10295_2019_2226_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (107 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 107 kb)
10295_2019_2226_MOESM2_ESM.docx (2.4 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 2436 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Basak S, Geng H, Jiang R (2014) Rewiring global regulator cAMP receptor protein (CRP) to improve E. coli tolerance towards low pH. J Biotechnol 173:68–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broadbent JR, Larsen RL, Deibel V, Steele JL (2010) Physiological and transcriptional response of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 to acid stress. J Bacteriol 192:2445–2458.  https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01618-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chattopadhyay MK, Tabor H (2013) Polyamines are critical for the induction of the glutamate decarboxylase-dependent acid resistance system in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 288:33559–33570.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.510552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Even S, Lindley ND, Cocaign-Bousquet M (2003) Transcriptional, translational and metabolic regulation of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG 1363 grown in continuous acidic cultures. Microbiology 149:1935–1944.  https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26146-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernandez M, Zuniga M (2006) Amino acid catabolic pathways of lactic acid bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 32:155–183.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10408410600880643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaida SM, Al-Hinai MA, Indurthi DC, Nicolaou SA, Papoutsakis ET (2013) Synthetic tolerance: three noncoding small RNAs, DsrA, ArcZ and RprA, acting supra-additively against acid stress. Nucleic Acids Res 41:8726–8737.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guan N, Liu L, Shin HD, Chen RR, Zhang J, Li J, Du G, Shi Z, Chen J (2013) Systems-level understanding of how Propionibacterium acidipropionici respond to propionic acid stress at the microenvironment levels: mechanism and application. J Biotechnol 167:56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guan NZ, Du B, Li JH, Shin HD, Chen RR, Du GC, Chen J, Liu L (2018) Comparative genomics and transcriptomics analysis-guided metabolic engineering of Propionibacterium acidipropionici for improved propionic acid production. Biotechnol Bioeng 115:483–494.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guan NZ, Li JH, Shin HD, Du GC, Chen J, Liu L (2017) Microbial response to environmental stresses: from fundamental mechanisms to practical applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:3991–4008.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8264-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holo H, Nes IF (1989) High-frequency transformation, by electroporation, of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris grown with glycine in osmotically stabilized media. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:3119–3123Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JN, Burne RA (2017) CcpA and CodY coordinate acetate metabolism in Streptococcus mutans. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:15.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03274-16 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krulwich TA, Sachs G, Padan E (2011) Molecular aspects of bacterial pH sensing and homeostasis. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:330.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, Wang J (2009) SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 25:1966–1967.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martín MG, Sender PD, Peirú S, De Mendoza D, Magni C (2004) Acid-inducible transcription of the operon encoding the citrate lyase complex of Lactococcus lactis biovar diacetylactis CRL264. J Bacteriol 186:5649–5660.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.17.5649-5660.2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 5:621.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Negrete A, Shiloach J (2015) Constitutive expression of the sRNA GadY decreases acetate production and improves E. coli growth. Microb Cell Fact 14:10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0334-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Osullivan E, Condon S (1997) Intracellular pH is a major factor in the induction of tolerance to acid and other stresses in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4210–4215Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teixeira JS, Seeras A, Sanchez-Maldonado AF, Zhang CG, Su MSW, Ganzle MG (2014) Glutamine, glutamate, and arginine-based acid resistance in Lactobacillus reuteri. Food Microbiol 42:172–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weidmann S, Maitre M, Laurent J, Coucheney F, Rieu A, Guzzo J (2017) Production of the small heat shock protein Lo18 from Oenococcus oeni in Lactococcus lactis improves its stress tolerance. Int J Food Microbiol 247:18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu C, Zhang J, Chen W, Wang M, Du G, Chen J (2012) A combined physiological and proteomic approach to reveal lactic-acid-induced alterations in Lactobacillus casei Zhang and its mutant with enhanced lactic acid tolerance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93:707–722.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3757-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu C, Zhang J, Du G, Chen J (2013) Aspartate protects Lactobacillus casei against acid stress. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:4083–4093.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4647-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu CD, Huang J, Zhou RQ (2014) Progress in engineering acid stress resistance of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:1055–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5435-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu H, Liu J, Miao S, Zhao Y, Zhu H, Qiao M, Saris PEJ, Qiao J (2018) Contribution of YthA, a PspC family transcriptional regulator to Lactococcus lactis F44 acid tolerance and nisin yield: a transcriptomic approach. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e02483-02417.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02483-17 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhai ZY, Douillard FP, An HR, Wang GH, Guo XH, Luo YB, Hao YL (2014) Proteomic characterization of the acid tolerance response in Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus CAUH1 and functional identification of a novel acid stress-related transcriptional regulator Ldb0677. Environ Microbiol 16:1524–1537.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang J, Caiyin Q, Feng WJ, Zhao XL, Qiao B, Zhao GR, Qiao JJ (2016) Enhance nisin yield via improving acid-tolerant capability of Lactococcus lactis F44. Sci Rep 6:12.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhu Z, Zhang J, Ji X, Fang Z, Wu Z, Chen J, Du G (2018) Evolutionary engineering of industrial microorganisms-strategies and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:4615–4627.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8937-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhengming Zhu
    • 1
    • 3
  • Peishan Yang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Zhimeng Wu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Juan Zhang
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Guocheng Du
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of BiotechnologyJiangnan UniversityWuxiChina
  2. 2.The Key Laboratory of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biotechnology, Ministry of EducationJiangnan UniversityWuxiChina
  3. 3.School of BiotechnologyJiangnan UniversityWuxiChina

Personalised recommendations