Multiple-step chromosomal integration of divided segments from a large DNA fragment via CRISPR/Cas9 in Escherichia coli Metabolic Engineering and Synthetic Biology - Original Paper First Online: 23 November 2018 Abstract
Although CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing technology has developed vastly in
Escherichia coli, the chromosomal integration of large DNA fragment is still challenging compared with gene deletion and small fragment integration. Moreover, to guarantee sufficient Cas9-induced double-strand breaks, it is usually necessary to design several gRNAs to select the appropriate one. Accordingly, we established a practical daily routine in the laboratory work, involving multiple-step chromosomal integration of the divided segments from a large DNA fragment. First, we introduced and optimized the protospacers from Streptococcus pyogenes in E. coli W3110. Next, the appropriate fragment size for each round of integration was optimized to be within 3–4 kb. Taking advantage of the optimized protospacer/gRNA pairs, a DNA fragment with a total size of 15.4 kb, containing several key genes for uridine biosynthesis, was integrated into W3110 chromosome, which produced 5.6 g/L uridine in shake flask fermentation. Using this strategy, DNA fragments of virtually any length can be integrated into a suitable genomic site, and two gRNAs can be alternatively used, avoiding the tedious construction of gRNA-expressing plasmids. This study thus presents a useful strategy for large DNA fragment integration into the E. coli chromosome, which can be easily adapted for use in other bacteria. Keywords Chromosomal integration Large DNA fragment CRISPR/Cas9 Protospacer Escherichia coli
Yanjun Li and Fangqing Yan contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (
) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-018-2114-5 Notes Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Prof. Tao Chen of Tianjin University for providing plasmids used in the CRISPR/Cas9 system. This work was financially supported by National High Technology Research and Development Program (2015AA021003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31500026, 31700037), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (2016M601269, 2017M61170) and Tianjin Key Technology R & D program of Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (17YFZCSY01050).
Compliance with ethical standards Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Atsumi S, Hanai T, Liao JC (2008) Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature 451:86–89.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06450 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Cunningham DS, Koepsel RR, Ataai MM, Domach MM (2009) Factors affecting plasmid production in
from a resource allocation standpoint. Microb Cell Fact 8:27.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-8-27 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Deltcheva E, Chylinski K, Sharma CM, Gonzales K, Chao Y, Pirzada ZA, Eckert MR, Vogel J, Charpentier E (2011) CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471:602–607.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09886 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Esvelt KM, Wang HH (2013) Genome-scale engineering for systems and synthetic biology. Mol Syst Biol 9:641.
https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2012.66 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Fan XG, Wu HY, Li GL, Yuan H, Zhang HC, Li YJ, Xie XX, Chen N (2017) Improvement of uridine production of
by atmospheric and room temperature plasma mutagenesis and high-throughput screening. PLoS One 12:e0176545.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176545 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Garneau JE, Dupuis MÈ, Villion M, Romero DA, Barrangou R, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Magadán AH, Moineau S (2010) The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 468:67.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09523 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Jeong J, Cho N, Jung D, Bang D (2013) Genome-scale genetic engineering in
. Biotechnol Adv 31:804–810.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.04.003 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA (2013) RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31:233–239.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2508 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Jiang Y, Chen B, Duan C, Sun B, Yang J, Yang S (2015) Multigene editing in the
genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:2506–2514.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04023-14 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816–821.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829 CrossRef Google Scholar
Kuhlman TE, Cox EC (2010) Site-specific chromosomal integration of large synthetic constructs. Nucleic Acids Res 38:e92.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1193 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Lange J, Müller F, Takors R, Blombach B (2018) Harnessing novel chromosomal integration loci to utilize an organosolv-derived hemicellulose fraction for isobutanol production with engineered
. Microb Biotechnol 11:257–263.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12879 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Li YF, Lin ZQ, Huang C, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Tang YJ (2015) Metabolic engineering of
using CRISPR-Cas9 meditated genome editing. Metab Eng 31:13–21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.06.006 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Nakashima N, Akita H, Hoshino T (2014) Establishment of a novel gene expression method, BICES (biomass-inducible chromosome-based expression system), and its application to the production of 2,3-butanediol and acetoin. Metab Eng 25:204–214.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2014.07.011 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Park HM, Liu H, Wu J, Chong A, Mackley V, Fellmann C, Rao A, Jiang F, Chu H, Murthy N, Lee K (2018) Extension of the crRNA enhances Cpf1 gene editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat Commun 9:3313.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05641-3 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Pyne ME, Mooyoung M, Chung DA, Chou CP (2015) Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in
. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5103–5114.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01248-15 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Sharan SK, Thomason LC, Kuznetsov SG, Court DL (2009) Recombineering: a homologous recombination-based method of genetic engineering. Nat Protoc 4:206.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.227 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Song CW, Lee J, Lee SY (2015) Genome engineering and gene expression control for bacterial strain development. Biotechnol J 10:56–68.
https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400057 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
St-Pierre F, Cui L, Priest DG, Endy D, Dodd IB, Shearwin KE (2013) One-step cloning and chromosomal integration of DNA. ACS Synth Biol 2:537–541.
https://doi.org/10.1021/sb400021j CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Tyo KEJ, Ajikumar PK, Stephanopoulos G (2009) Stabilized gene duplication enables long-term selection-free heterologous pathway expression. Nat Biotechnol 27:760–765.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1555 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Ublinskaya AA, Samsonov VV, Mashko SV, Stoynova NV (2012) A PCR-free cloning method for the targeted φ80 Int-mediated integration of any long DNA fragment, bracketed with meganuclease recognition sites, into the
chromosome. J Microbiol Methods 89:167–173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2012.03.013 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Wang HH, Church GM (2011) Multiplexed genome engineering and genotyping methods applications for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering. Method Enzymol 498:409–426.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385120-8.00018-8 CrossRef Google Scholar
Yadav VG, De Mey M, Lim CG, Ajikumar PK, Stephanopoulos G (2012) The future of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology: towards a systematic practice. Metab Eng 14:233–241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.02.001 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar
Yu D, Ellis HM, Lee EC, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Court DL (2000) An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in
. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5978–5983.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.100127597 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar Copyright information
© Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018