Advertisement

Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology

, Volume 41, Issue 9, pp 1391–1404 | Cite as

Use of a stress-minimisation paradigm in high cell density fed-batch Escherichia coli fermentations to optimise recombinant protein production

  • Chris Wyre
  • Tim W. Overton
Fermentation, Cell Culture and Bioengineering

Abstract

Production of recombinant proteins is an industrially important technique in the biopharmaceutical sector. Many recombinant proteins are problematic to generate in a soluble form in bacteria as they readily form insoluble inclusion bodies. Recombinant protein solubility can be enhanced by minimising stress imposed on bacteria through decreasing growth temperature and the rate of recombinant protein production. In this study, we determined whether these stress-minimisation techniques can be successfully applied to industrially relevant high cell density Escherichia coli fermentations generating a recombinant protein prone to forming inclusion bodies, CheY–GFP. Flow cytometry was used as a routine technique to rapidly determine bacterial productivity and physiology at the single cell level, enabling determination of culture heterogeneity. We show that stress minimisation can be applied to high cell density fermentations (up to a dry cell weight of >70 g L−1) using semi-defined media and glucose or glycerol as carbon sources, and using early or late induction of recombinant protein production, to produce high yields (up to 6 g L−1) of aggregation-prone recombinant protein in a soluble form. These results clearly demonstrate that stress minimisation is a viable option for the optimisation of high cell density industrial fermentations for the production of high yields of difficult-to-produce recombinant proteins, and present a workflow for the application of stress-minimisation techniques in a variety of fermentation protocols.

Keywords

Green fluorescent protein Fed-batch fermentation Flow cytometry Inclusion bodies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council PhD studentship to CW. We thank Yanina Sevastsyanovich and Tania Selas Castiñeiras for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer was awarded to TWO by the BD Accuri Creativity Award. TWO was paid speakers expenses by BD for speaking at a BD Accuri users’ event. The funders played no role in the design or implementation of this study.

Supplementary material

10295_2014_1489_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1804 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Åkerlund T, Nordström K, Bernander R (1995) Analysis of cell size and DNA content in exponentially growing and stationary-phase batch cultures of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 177:6791–6797PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alfasi S, Sevastsyanovich Y, Zaffaroni L, Griffiths L, Hall R, Cole J (2011) Use of GFP fusions for the isolation of Escherichia coli strains for improved production of different target recombinant proteins. J Biotechnol 156:11–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carvalho RJ, Cabrera-Crespo J, Tanizaki MM, Goncalves VM (2012) Development of production and purification processes of recombinant fragment of pneumococcal surface protein A in Escherichia coli using different carbon sources and chromatography sequences. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94:683–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cormack BP, Valdivia RH, Falkow S (1996) FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173:33–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cote RJ (2010) Media composition, microbial, laboratory scale. In: Flickinger MC (ed) Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology, bioprocess, bioseparation, and cell technology. Wiley, New York, pp 3277–3297Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    García-Fruitós E, González-Montalbán N, Morell M, Vera A, Ferraz RM, Arís A, Ventura S, Villaverde A (2005) Aggregation as bacterial inclusion bodies does not imply inactivation of enzymes and fluorescent proteins. Microb Cell Fact 4:27PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones JJ, Bridges AM, Fosberry AP, Gardner S, Lowers RR, Newby RR, James PJ, Hall RM, Jenkins O (2004) Potential of real-time measurement of GFP-fusion proteins. J Biotechnol 109:201–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones JJ (2007) Green fluorescent protein as an analytical tool to dissect the physiology of recombinant protein production in fermenters. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luo Q, Shen YL, Wei DZ, Cao W (2006) Optimization of culture on the overproduction of TRAIL in high-cell-density culture by recombinant Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71:184–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martínez-Alonso M, García-Fruitós E, Ferrer-Miralles N, Rinas U, Villaverde A (2010) Side effects of chaperone gene co-expression in recombinant protein production. Microb Cell Fact 9:64PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miroux B, Walker JE (1996) Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels. J Mol Biol 260:289–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moore JT, Uppal A, Maley F, Maley GF (1993) Overcoming inclusion body formation in a high-level expression system. Protein Expr Purif 4:160–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Müller S, Nebe-von-Caron G (2010) Functional single-cell analyses: flow cytometry and cell sorting of microbial populations and communities. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:554–587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Overton TW (2014) Recombinant protein production in bacterial hosts. Drug Discov Today (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.11.008
  15. 15.
    Pflug S, Richter SM, Urlacher VB (2007) Development of a fed-batch process for the production of the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP102A1 from Bacillus megaterium in E. coli. J Biotechnol 129:481–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reuter M, Hayward NJ, Black SS, Miller S, Dryden DT, Booth IR (2013) Mechanosensitive channels and bacterial cell wall integrity: does life end with a bang or a whimper? J R Soc Interface 11:20130850. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0850 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saïda F, Uzan M, Odaert B, Bontems F (2006) Expression of highly toxic genes in E. coli: special strategies and genetic tools. Curr Protein Pept Sci 7:47–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1987) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sevastsyanovich Y, Alfasi S, Overton T, Hall R, Jones J, Hewitt C, Cole J (2009) Exploitation of GFP fusion proteins and stress avoidance as a generic strategy for the production of high-quality recombinant proteins. FEMS Microbiol Lett 299:86–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singh SM, Panda AK (2005) Solubilization and refolding of bacterial inclusion body proteins. J Biosci Bioeng 99:303–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sørensen HP, Mortensen KK (2005) Soluble expression of recombinant proteins in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact 4:1PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strandberg L, Andersson L, Enfors S (1994) The use of fed batch cultivation for achieving high cell densities in the production of a recombinant protein in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Rev 14:53–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Studier FW (1991) Use of bacteriophage T7 lysozyme to improve an inducible T7 expression system. J Mol Biol 219:37–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tseng CL, Leng CH (2012) Influence of medium components on the expression of recombinant lipoproteins in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93:1539–1552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Valgepea K, Adamberg K, Seiman A, Vilu R (2013) Escherichia coli achieves faster growth by increasing catalytic and translation rates of proteins. Mol BioSyst 9:2344–2358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Waldo GS, Standish BM, Berendzen J, Terwilliger TC (1999) Rapid protein-folding assay using green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 17:691–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wallace R, Holms W (1986) Maintenance coefficients and rates of turnover of cell material in Escherichia coli ML308 at different growth temperatures. FEMS Microbiol Lett 37:317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walsh G (2010) Biopharmaceutical benchmarks. Nat Biotechnol 28:917–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Want A, Thomas OR, Kara B, Liddell J, Hewitt CJ (2009) Studies related to antibody fragment (Fab) production in Escherichia coli W3110 fed-batch fermentation processes using multiparameter flow cytometry. Cytom A 75:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang JD, Li AT, Xu JH (2010) Improved expression of recombinant cytochrome P450 monooxygenase in Escherichia coli for asymmetric oxidation of sulfides. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 33:1043–1049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bioengineering, School of Chemical Engineering, and Institute of Microbiology and InfectionUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations