High-throughput sequencing of amplicons for monitoring yeast biodiversity in must and during alcoholic fermentation

  • Vanessa David
  • Sébastien Terrat
  • Khaled Herzine
  • Olivier Claisse
  • Sandrine Rousseaux
  • Raphaëlle Tourdot-Maréchal
  • Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede
  • Lionel Ranjard
  • Hervé Alexandre
Environmental Microbiology


We compared pyrosequencing technology with the PCR-ITS-RFLP analysis of yeast isolates and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). These methods gave divergent findings for the yeast population. DGGE was unsuitable for the quantification of biodiversity and its use for species detection was limited by the initial abundance of each species. The isolates identified by PCR-ITS-RFLP were not fully representative of the true population. For population dynamics, high-throughput sequencing technology yielded results differing in some respects from those obtained with other approaches. This study demonstrates that 454 pyrosequencing of amplicons is more relevant than other methods for studying the yeast community on grapes and during alcoholic fermentation. Indeed, this high-throughput sequencing method detected larger numbers of species on grapes and identified species present during alcoholic fermentation that were undetectable with the other techniques.


Yeast biodiversity 454 pyrosequencing Grape Wine DGGE PCR-ITS-RFLP DNA fingerprints 



This work, through the involvement of the technical facilities of the GenoSol platform of the ANAEE-Services infrastructure, received a grant from the French state through the National Research Agency, as part of the “Investments for the Future” program (reference ANR-11-INBS-0001), and a grant from the Regional Council of Burgundy.


  1. 1.
    Beltran G, Torija MJ, Novo M, Ferrer N, Poblet M, Guillamon JM, Rozes N, Mas A (2002) Analysis of yeast populations during alcoholic fermentation: a six-year follow-up study. Syst Appl Microbiol 25:287–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berry D, Mahfoudh KB, Wagner M, Loy A (2011) Barcoded primers used in multiplex amplicon pyrosequencing bias amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:7846–7849PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bisson LF, Joseph CML (2009) Yeasts. In: König H (ed) Biology of microorganisms on grapes in must and in wine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bokulich NA, Joseph CM, Allen G, Benson AK, Mills DA (2012) Next-generation sequencing reveals significant bacterial diversity of botrytized wine. PLoS ONE 7:e36357PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bokulich NA, Bamforth CW, Mills DA (2012) Brewhouse-resident microbiota are responsible for multi-stage fermentation of American coolship ale. PLoS ONE 7(4):e35507PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bokulich NA, Ohta M, Richardson PM, Mills DA (2013) Monitoring seasonal changes in winery-resident microbiota. PLoS ONE 6:e66437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borman AM, Linton CJ, Miles SJ, Campbell CK, Johnson EM (2006) Ultra-rapid preparation of total genomic DNA from isolates of yeast and mould using Whatman FTA filter paper technology: a re-usable DNA archiving system. Med Mycol 44:389–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cavalieri D, Barberio C, Casalone E, Pinzauti F, Sebastiani F, Mortimer R, Polsinelli M (1998) Genetic and molecular diversity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae natural populations. Food Technol Biotechnol 36:45–50Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré N, Christen R, Dequiedt S, Mougel C, Lelièvre M, Jolivet C, Shahbazkia HR, Guillou L, Arrouays D, Ranjard L (2011) Validation and application of a PCR primer set to quantify fungal communities in the soil environment by real-time quantitative PCR. PLoS ONE 6:e24166PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cocolin L, Bisson LF, Mills DA (2000) Direct profiling of the yeast dynamics in wine fermentations. FEMS Microbiol Lett 189:81–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Comitini F, Ciani M (2008) Influence of fungicide treatments on the occurrence of yeast flora associated with wine grapes. Ann Microbiol 58:489–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cordero-Bueso G, Arroyo T, Serrano A, Tello J, Aporta I, Vélez MD, Valero E (2011) Influence of the farming system and vine variety on yeast communities associated with grape berries. Int J Food Microbiol 145:132–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dobson A, O’sullivan O, Cotter PD, Ross P, Hill C (2011) High-throughput sequence-based analysis of the bacterial composition of kefir and an associated kefir grain. FEMS Microbiol Lett 320:56–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Esteve-Zarzoso B, Belloch C, Uruburu F, Querol A (1999) Identification of yeasts by RFLP analysis of the 5 8S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49:329–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fleet GH (2003) Yeast interactions and wine flavor. Int J Food Microbiol 86:11–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fowell RR (1965) The identification of wild yeast colonies on lysine agar. J Appl Bacteriol 28:373–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gil JV, Mateo JJ, Jimenez M, Pastor A, Huerta T (1996) Aroma compounds in wines as influenced by apiculate yeasts. J Food Sci 61:1247–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heard G (1999) Novel yeasts in winemaking—looking to the future. Food Aust 51:347–352Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ivey ML, Phister TG (2011) Detection and identification of microorganisms in wine: a review of molecular techniques. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38:1619–1634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jolly N, Augustyn O, Pretorius I (2003) The occurrence of non-Saccharomyces yeast species over three vintages on four vineyards and grape musts from four production regions of the Western Cape South Africa. S Afr J Enol Vitic 24:35–42Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P (2010) Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol 12:118–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leite AMO, Mayoa B, Rachid CTCC, Peixoto RS, Silva JT, Paschoalin VMF, Delgado S (2012) Assessment of the microbial diversity of Brazilian kefir grains by PCR-DGGE and pyrosequencing analysis. Food Microbiol 31:215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer ML, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martini A, Ciani M, Scorzetti G (1996) Direct enumeration and isolation of wine yeast from grape surfaces. Am J Enol Vitic 47:435–440Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Milanović V, Comitini F, Ciani M (2013) Grape berry yeast communities: influence of fungicide treatments. Int J Food Microbiol 161:240–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mills DA, Johannsen EA, Cocolin L (2002) Yeast diversity and persistence in Botrytis affected wine fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4884–4893PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Eddy SR (2009) Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 25:1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nisiotu AA, Spiropoulos AE, Nychas G-JE (2007) Yeast community structures and dynamics in healthy and Botrytis-affected grape must fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol 21:6705–6713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pascault N, Ranjard L, Kaisermann A, Bachar D, Christen R, Terrat S, Mathieu O, Lévêque J, Mougel C, Henault C, Lemanceau P, Péan M, Boiry S, Fontaine S, Maron PA (2013) Stimulation of different functional groups of bacteria by various plant residues as a driver of soil priming effect. Ecosystems. doi: 10.1007/s10021-013-9650-7 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prakitchaiwattana CJ, Fleet GH, Heard GM (2004) Application and evaluation of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to analyse the yeast ecology of wine grapes. FEMS Yeast Res 4:865–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ribéreau-Gayon P, Peynaud E (1960) Traité d’Oenologie Paris et Liège. Librairie Polytechnique Ch Béranger Paris, pp 293–298Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Regueiro LA, Costas CL, Lopez Rubio JE (1993) Influence of viticultural and enological practices on the development of yeast populations during winemaking. Am J Enol Vitic 44:405–408Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Renouf V, Claisse O, Lonvaud-Funel A (2007) Inventory and monitoring of wine microbial consortia. J Appl Microbiol 75:149–164Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sadoudi M, Tourdot-Maréchal R, Rousseaux S, Steyer D, Gallardo-Chacón JJ, Ballester J, Vichi S, Guérin-Schneider R, Caixach J, Alexandre H (2012) Yeast-yeast interactions revealed by aromatic profile analysis of Sauvignon Blanc wine fermented by single or co-culture of non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeasts. Food Microbiol 32:243–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Solieri L, Dakal TC, Giudici P (2013) Next-generation sequencing and its potential impact on food microbial genomics. Ann Microbiol 63:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Setati ME, Jacobson D, Andong UC, Bauer F (2013) The vineyard yeast microbiome a mixed model microbial map. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/j.pone.0052609 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sipiczki M (2006) Metschnikowia strains isolated from botrytized grapes antagonize fungal and bacterial growth by iron depletion. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6716–6724PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Soden A, Francis IL, Oakey H, Henschke PA (2000) Effects of co-fermentation with Candida stellata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the aroma and composition of Chardonnay wine. Aust J Grape Wine Res 6:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Terrat S, Christen R, Dequiedt S, Lelievre M, Nowak V, Regnier T, Bachar D, Plassart P, Wincker P, Jolivet C, Bispo A, Lemanceau P, Maron PA, Mougel C, Ranjard L (2012) Molecular biomass and MetaTaxogenomic assessment of soil microbial communities as influenced by soil DNA extraction procedure. Microb Biotechnol 5:135–141PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfarnd DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zott K, Thibon C, Bely M, Lonvaud-Funel A, Dubourdieu D, Masneuf-Pomarede I (2011) The grape must non-Saccharomyces microbial community: impact on volatile thiol release. Int J Food Microbiol 151:210–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vanessa David
    • 1
  • Sébastien Terrat
    • 4
  • Khaled Herzine
    • 1
  • Olivier Claisse
    • 2
  • Sandrine Rousseaux
    • 1
  • Raphaëlle Tourdot-Maréchal
    • 1
  • Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede
    • 2
  • Lionel Ranjard
    • 3
    • 4
  • Hervé Alexandre
    • 1
  1. 1.UMR 02102 PAM Université de Bourgogne-AgroSup Dijon Laboratoire VALMIS Institut Universitaire de la Vigne et du Vin Jules GuyotUniversité de BourgogneDijon CedexFrance
  2. 2.INRA, USC 1366 ŒnologieUniversité de BordeauxVillenave d’OrnonFrance
  3. 3.INRA, UMR 1347 AgroécologieDijonFrance
  4. 4.INRA, UMR 1347 Agroécologie-Plateforme GenosolDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations