Advertisement

Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology

, Volume 38, Issue 9, pp 1535–1543 | Cite as

Modeling the inactivation of Bacillus subtilis spores by ethylene oxide processing

  • G. C. Mendes
  • T. R. S. Brandão
  • C. L. M. Silva
Original Paper

Abstract

Ethylene oxide is currently a dominant agent in medical device sterilization. This work intends to study the main effects and interactions of temperature, ethylene oxide concentration, and relative humidity on commercial spore strips of Bacillus subtilis, var. niger (ATCC 9372) inactivation, the most common microorganism used in controlling the efficacy of the process. Experiments were carried out using a full factorial experimental design at two levels (23 factorial design). Limit target exposure conditions for ethylene oxide concentration, temperature, and relative humidity were 250–1,000 mg EO/l, 40–60°C, and 50–90%, respectively. Adopting a different approach from the first-order kinetics, a Gompertz model was successfully applied in data fitting of the inactivation curves. Bacillus subtilis kinetic behavior presented a sigmoidal inactivation with an initial shoulder (λ), followed by a maximum inactivation rate (kmax), these being model parameters. It was concluded that temperature and ethylene oxide concentration were the most significant factors and consequently, additional experiments were carried out aiming at describing the parameters' dependence on these process factors. Mathematical relations describing such dependences were successfully developed and included in the Gompertz kinetic model. The predictive ability of this integrated model was assessed, and its adequacy in predicting B. subtilis inactivation was proven.

Keywords

Applied microbiology Modeling Bacillus subtilis spores Ethylene oxide sterilization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Bastos Viegas, S.A. The author Teresa R. S. Brandão acknowledges financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/41419/2007).

References

  1. 1.
    Baranyi J, Roberts TA (1994) A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int J Food Microbiol 23:277–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhaduri S, Smith PW, Palumbo SA, Turner-Jones CO, Smith JL, Marmer BS, Buchanan RL, Zaika LL, Williams AC (1991) Thermal destruction of Listeria monocytogenes in liver sausage slurry. Food Microbiol 8:75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experiments: an introduction to design, data analysis and model building. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buzrul S, Alpas H (2004) Modeling the synergistic effect of high pressure and heat on inactivation kinetics of Listeria innocua: a preliminary study. FEMS Microbiol Lett 238:29–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen H (2006) Use of linear, Weibull, and log-logistic functions to model pressure inactivation of seven foodborne pathogens in milk. Food Microbiol 24(3):197–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chhabra AT, Carter WH, Linton RH, Cousin MA (1999) A predictive model to determine the effects of pH, milkfat, and temperature on thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes. J Food Prot 62:1143–1149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cole MB, Davies KW, Munro G, Holyoak CD, Kilsby DC (1993) A vitalistic model to describe the thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 12(3–5):232–239Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demitrius CA, Duran AP, Chamberlain VC, Hitchinc VM (1993) Comparison of European and US biological indicators for ethylene oxide sterilization. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 12:399–402Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garthright WE (1991) Refinements in the prediction of microbial growth curves. Food Microbiol 8:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geeraerd AH, Herremans CH, Van Impe JF (2000) Structural model requirements to describe microbial inactivation during a mild heat treatment. Int J Food Microbiol 59(3):185–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibson AM, Bratchell N, Roberts TA (1987) The effect of sodium chloride and temperature on the rate and extent of growth of Clostridium botulinum type A in pasteurized pork slurry. J Appl Bacteriol 62(6):479–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gil MM, Brandão TRS, Silva CLM (2006) A modified Gompertz model to predict microbial inactivation under time-varying temperature conditions. J Food Eng 76(1):89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heider D, Gomann J, Junghann BU, Kaiser U (2002) Kill kinetics study of Bacillus subtilis spores in ethylene oxide sterilisation processes. Zentr Steril 10(3):158–167Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO technical committee 198 (2006) ISO 11138-2, sterilization of health care products—biological indicators, part 2: biological indicators for ethylene oxide sterilization processes. ISO Press, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO technical committee 198 (2007) ISO 11135-1, sterilization of health care products—ethylene oxide, part 1: requirements for development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices. ISO Press, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Juneja VK, Eblen BS, Marks HM (2001) Modelling non-linear survival curves to calculate thermal inactivation of Salmonella in poultry of different fat levels. Int J Food Microbiol 70:37–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Juneja VK, Marks HM, Mohr T (2003) Predictive thermal inactivation model for effects of temperature, sodium lactate, NaCl, and sodium pyrophosphate on Salmonella serotypes in ground beef. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(9):5138–5156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim SR, Rhee MS, Kim BC, Lee H, Kim KH (2007) Modelling of the inactivation of Samonella typhimurium by supercritical carbon dioxide in physiological saline and phosphate-buffered saline. J Microbiol Methods 70(1):132–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Linton RH, Carter WH, Pierson MD, Hackney CR (1995) Use of a modified Gompertz equation to model non-linear survival curves for Listeria monocytogenes. Scott A. J Food Prot 58:946–954Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mendes GC, Brandão TRS, Silva CLM (2007) Ethylene oxide sterilization of medical devices: a review. Am J Infect Control 35(9):574–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mosley GA (2002) Estimating the effects of EtO bier-vessel operating precision on D-value calculations. Med Devices Diagn Ind 24(4):46–56Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mosley GA, Gillis JR (2004) Factors affecting tailing in ethylene oxide sterilization part 1: when tailing is an artifact … and scientific deficiencies in ISO 11135 and EN 550. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 58(2):81–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mosley GA, Gillis JR, Krushefski G (2005) Evaluating the formulae for integrated lethality in ethylene oxide sterilization using six different endospores forming strains of bacteria, and comparisons of integrated lethality for ethylene oxide and steam systems. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 59(1):64–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mosley GA, Gillis JR, Whitbourne JE (2002) Calculating equivalent time for use in determining the lethality of EtO sterilization processes. Med Devices Diagn Ind 24(2):54–63Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mosley GA, Gillis JR, Whitbourne JE (2002) Formulae for calculations of integrated lethality for EtO sterilization processes. Pharm Technol 14(10):1–12Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mosley GA, Houghtling CW (2005) Interpreting and understanding microbial data in validation of ethylene oxide sterilization processes. Biomed Instrum Technol 39:466–482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oxborrow GS, Placencia AM, Danielson JW (1983) Effects of temperature and relative humidity on biological indicators used for ethylene oxide sterilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 45(2):546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peleg M (2000) Microbial survival curves—the reality of flat “shoulders” and absolute thermal death times. Food Res Int 33:531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peleg M, Cole MB (1998) Reinterpretation of microbial survival curves. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 38(5):353–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Richardson T, Hyslop DB (1985) Enzymes. In: Fennema O (ed) Food chemistry. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 412–413Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rodriguez AC, Young B, Caulk K, Zelewski J, Kwasnica S, Aguirre S (2001) Calculating accumulated lethality and survivorship in EtO sterilisation processes. Med Devices Diagn Ind 23(9):100–107Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rutala WA, Weber DJ (1999) Infection control: the role of disinfection and sterilization. J Hosp Infect 43(Suppl):S43–S55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shintani H, Tahata T, Hatakeyama K, Takahashi M, Ishii K, Hayashi H (1995) Comparison of D10-value accuracy by the limited Spearman-Karber procedure (LSKP), the Stumbo-Murphy-Cochran procedure (SMCP), and the survival-curve method (EN). Biomed Instrum Technol 29:113–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sordellini PJ, Satter SE, Caputo VA (1998) EtO sterilization: principles of process design. Med Devices Diagn Ind 20(12):47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. C. Mendes
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. R. S. Brandão
    • 2
  • C. L. M. Silva
    • 2
  1. 1.Bastos Viegas, S.A.PenafielPortugal
  2. 2.Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina, Escola Superior de BiotecnologiaUniversidade Católica PortuguesaPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations