Transcriptional repression by Kluyveromyces lactis Tup1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Mónica Lamas-Maceiras
  • María Angeles Freire-Picos
  • Ana Maria Rodríguez TorresEmail author
Original Paper


The general repression complex, constituted by the yeast Tup1 and Ssn6 factors, is a conserved global regulator of transcription in eukaryotes. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, it is an important repressor of hypoxic genes, such as ANB1, under aerobic conditions and deletion of the TUP1 gene causes a flocculation phenotype. The KlTUP1 gene from the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis encodes for a protein with 83% similarity to Tup1 in S. cerevisiae. Despite the general domain conservation, the database searches showed the absence of a characteristic Tup1 glutamine-rich domain (Q1 at positions 96–116). Instead, there was a non-conserved sequence lacking the α-helix structure in this region. The ability to act as a transcriptional repressor was tested by expressing the KlTUP1 gene, in both high- and low-copy vectors, in an S. cerevisiae tup1 mutant strain. Repression effects were studied using the aerobic repressible reporter ANB1lacZ and the effect on flocculation. In both regulatory systems, low levels of KlTup1 caused moderate (~30%) repression, but when the number of KlTup1 copies was increased, only the ANB1 reporter raised the repression levels of S. cerevisiae Tup1. These results show the capability of KlTup1 to act as a repressor in S. cerevisiae. The lower repression reached in S. cerevisiae is discussed in terms of structural differences.


Yeast Tup1 Transcriptional regulation Repression complex Kluyveromyces lactis 



The authors thank Richard S. Zitomer (SUNY at Albany, NY, USA) for his collaboration. This research was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia (BMC2000-0133) and the Xunta de Galicia (PGIDIT06XIB103086PR).


  1. 1.
    Balasubramanian B, Lowry CV, Zitomer RS (1993) The Rox1 repressor of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae hypoxic genes is a specific DNA-binding protein with a high-mobility group motif. Mol Cell Biol 13:6071–6078PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bussereau F, Casaregola S, Lafay J-F, Bolotin-Fukuhara M (2006) The Kluyveromyces lactis repertoire of transcriptional regulators. FEMS Yeast Res 6:325–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carrico PM, Zitomer RS (1998) Mutational analysis of the Tup1 general repressor of yeast. Genetics 148:637–644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ (2008) The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 36:197–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcia-Higuera I, Fenoglio J, Li Y, Lewis C, Panchenko MP, Reiner O, Smith TF, Neer EJ (1996) Folding of proteins with WD-repeats: comparison of six members of the WD-repeat superfamily to the G protein beta subunit. Biochemistry 35:13985–13994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gietz RD, Sugino A (1988) New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    González-Siso MI, Freire-Picos MA, Ramil E, González-Domínguez M, Rodríguez Torres A, Cerdán ME (2000) Respirofermentative metabolism in Kluyveromyces lactis: insights and perspectives. Enzyme Microb Technol 26:699–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Green SR, Johnson AD (2004) Promoter-dependent roles for the Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase and the Hda1 deacetylase in Tup1-mediated repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 15:4191–4202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malavé TM, Dent SYR (2006) Transcriptional repression by Tup1–Ssn6. Biochem Cell Biol 84:437–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramil E, Freire-Picos MA, Cerdán ME (1998) Characterization of promoter regions involved in high expression of KlCYC1. Eur J Biochem 256:67–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rose MD, Winston F, Hieter P (1990) Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith RL, Johnson AD (2000) Turning genes off by Ssn6–Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci 25:325–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sprague ER, Redd MJ, Johnson AD, Wolberger C (2000) Structure of the C-terminal domain of Tup1, a corepressor of transcription in yeast. EMBO J 19:3016–3027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Teunissen AW, van den Berg JA, Steensma HY (1995) Transcriptional regulation of flocculation genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 11:435–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tzamarias D, Struhl K (1994) Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8–Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature 369:758–761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wahi M, Komachi K, Johnson AD (1998) Gene regulation by the yeast Ssn6–Tup1 corepressor. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 63:447–457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang M, Rosenblum-Vos LS, Lowry CV, Boakye KA, Zitomer RS (1991) A yeast protein with homology to the β-subunit of G proteins is involved in control of heme-regulated and catabolite-repressed genes. Gene 97:153–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang Z, Varanasi U, Carrico P, Trumbly RJ (2002) Mutations of the WD repeats that compromise Tup1 repression function maintain structural integrity of the WD domain trypsin-resistant core. Arch Biochem Biophys 406:47–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mónica Lamas-Maceiras
    • 1
  • María Angeles Freire-Picos
    • 1
  • Ana Maria Rodríguez Torres
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of A CoruñaA CoruñaSpain

Personalised recommendations