Advertisement

Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills

  • Misook Kim
  • Donal F. Day
Original Paper

Abstract

A challenge facing the biofuel industry is to develop an economically viable and sustainable biorefinery. The existing potential biorefineries in Louisiana, raw sugar mills, operate only 3 months of the year. For year-round operation, they must adopt other feedstocks, besides sugar cane, as supplemental feedstocks. Energy cane and sweet sorghum have different harvest times, but can be processed for bio-ethanol using the same equipment. Juice of energy cane contains 9.8% fermentable sugars and that of sweet sorghum, 11.8%. Chemical composition of sugar cane bagasse was determined to be 42% cellulose, 25% hemicellulose, and 20% lignin, and that of energy cane was 43% cellulose, 24% hemicellulose, and 22% lignin. Sweet sorghum was 45% cellulose, 27% hemicellulose, and 21% lignin. Theoretical ethanol yields would be 3,609 kg per ha from sugar cane, 12,938 kg per ha from energy cane, and 5,804 kg per ha from sweet sorghum.

Keywords

Ethanol Sugar cane bagasse Energy cane Sweet sorghum Louisiana sugar mills 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the U.S. Department of Energy (Award# DE-FG36-08GO88151) for their financial support of this research project. We would also like to thank Ms. Chardcie Verret, Ms. Irina Dinu, and Dr. Lee Madsen from Audubon Sugar Institute at Louisiana State University AgCenter for their analytical support, and Dr. Kun-Jun Han from Southeast Research Station at LSU AgCenter to provide sweet sorghum.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim M, Aita G, Day DF (2010) Compositional changes in sugarcane bagasse on low temperature, long-term diluted ammonia treatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161:34–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim M, Day DF, Han K (2010) Evaluation of sweet sorghum as a feedstock for bio-ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol (submitted on July 28, 2010, manuscript number, ABAB-2578)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Day DF, Kim M (2009) Antifungal and anti-cariogenic cellobio-oligosaccharides produced by dextransucrase. WO/2009/129525Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Day DF, Chung C (2007) Isomaltooligosaccharides from Leuconostoc as neutraceuticals. US Patent 7,291,607Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    USDA (2008) National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) sugarcane. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/index2.jsp
  6. 6.
    Rein PW (2007) Prospects for the conversion of a sugar mill into a biorefinery. Proc Inc Soc Sugar Cane Technol 26:44–60Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT (2000) Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. I: sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 74:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goh CS, Tan KT, Lee KT, Bhatia S (2010) Bio-ethanol from lignocelluloses: status, perspectives and challenges in Malaysia. Bioresour Technol 101:4834–4841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Viator RP, Johnson R, Richard EP Jr (2005) Challenges of post-harvest residue management in the Louisiana sugarcane industry. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 25:238–244Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leal MRLV (2007) The potential of sugarcane as an energy source. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 26:23–34Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mark TB, Salassi ME, Deliberto MA (2009) Developing a cellulosic ethanol industry in Louisiana. LA Agriculture 53:10–11Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tesso TT, Claflin LE, Tuinstra MR (2005) Analysis of stalk rot resistance and genetic diversity among drought tolerant sorghum genotypes. Crop Sci 45:642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Woods J (2000) Integrating sweet sorghum and sugarcane for bioenergy: modeling the potential for electricity and ethanol production in SE Zimbabwe. Ph.D. thesis, King’s college, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Viator HP, Alison M, Gravois K, Han KJ, Harrell D, Hogan A, Pittman W, Salassi M, Whatley J (2009) Sweet sorghum for biofuel production in Louisiana. LA Agriculture 53:16–17Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Polak JA, Day DF (1982) Ethanol from sweet sorghum. J Am Soc of Sugarcane Technol 1:52–56Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sipos B, Réczey J, Somorai Z, Kádár Z, Dienes D, Réczey K (2009) Sweet sorghum as feedstock for ethanol production: enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated bagasse. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 153:151–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tew TL, Cobill RM, Richard EP Jr (2008) Evaluation of sweet sorghum and sorghum × sudangrass hybrids as feedstocks for ethanol production. Bioenergy Res 1:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwietzke S, Kim Y, Ximenes E, Mosier N, Ladisch M (2009) Ethanol production from maize. In: Kriz AL, Larkins BA (eds) Molecular genetic approaches to maize improvement. Springer, Berlin, pp 347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Audubon Sugar InstituteLouisiana State University Agricultural CenterSt. GabrielUSA

Personalised recommendations