Sustainable bioethanol production combining biorefinery principles using combined raw materials from wheat undersown with clover-grass
- 431 Downloads
To obtain the best possible net energy balance of the bioethanol production the biomass raw materials used need to be produced with limited use of non-renewable fossil fuels. Intercropping strategies are known to maximize growth and productivity by including more than one species in the crop stand, very often with legumes as one of the components. In the present study clover-grass is undersown in a traditional wheat crop. Thereby, it is possible to increase input of symbiotic fixation of atmospheric nitrogen into the cropping systems and reduce the need for fertilizer applications. Furthermore, when using such wheat and clover-grass mixtures as raw material, addition of urea and other fermentation nutrients produced from fossil fuels can be reduced in the whole ethanol manufacturing chain. Using second generation ethanol technology mixtures of relative proportions of wheat straw and clover-grass (15:85, 50:50, and 85:15) were pretreated by wet oxidation. The results showed that supplementing wheat straw with clover-grass had a positive effect on the ethanol yield in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation experiments, and the effect was more pronounced in inhibitory substrates. The highest ethanol yield (80% of theoretical) was obtained in the experiment with high fraction (85%) of clover-grass. In order to improve the sugar recovery of clover-grass, it should be separated into a green juice (containing free sugars, fructan, amino acids, vitamins and soluble minerals) for direct fermentation and a fibre pulp for pretreatment together with wheat straw. Based on the obtained results a decentralized biorefinery concept for production of biofuel is suggested emphasizing sustainability, localness, and recycling principles.
KeywordsBiomass Intercropping Bioethanol Wetoxidation Biorefinery
We thank for technical assistance from Tomas Fernqvist, Risø-DTU.
- 1.Andersen M, Kiel P, Thomsen MH (2006) Use of plant juice as fermentation medium. In: Kamm B, Gruber PR, Kamm M (eds) Biorefineries—industrial processes and products, Wiley-VCH, Germany, pp 295–314Google Scholar
- 2.Bai FW, Anderson WA, Moo-Young M (2008) Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv, pp 89–105Google Scholar
- 4.EU (2007) Brussels European Council 8–9 March—Presidency conclusions (http://mediacontent.ig.publicus.com/PDF/IG35268339.PDF)
- 5.Eurobserver (2006), Biofuels barometer May, pp 57–66Google Scholar
- 9.Hirst EL (1957) Some aspects of the chemistry of the fructosans. Proceedings of the Chemical Society, pp 193–204Google Scholar
- 15.Martín C, Thomsen MH, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Thomsen AB (2007) Wet oxidation pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of clover-ryegrass mixtures. Bioresour Technol. Accepted paperGoogle Scholar
- 22.Thomsen AB, Medina C, and Ahring BK (2003) Biotechnology in ethanol production. In: Larsen H, Kossmann J, Petersen LS (eds) 2, pp 40–44Google Scholar
- 23.Thomsen MH, Thygesen A, Christensen BH, Larsen J, Jørgensen H, Thomsen AB (2006) Preliminary results on optimising hydrothermal pretreatment used in co-production of biofuels. Appl Biochem Biotech, 129–132: 448–460Google Scholar