Sustainable bioethanol production combining biorefinery principles using combined raw materials from wheat undersown with clover-grass

  • Mette Hedegaard ThomsenEmail author
  • Henrik Haugaard-Nielsen
Original Paper


To obtain the best possible net energy balance of the bioethanol production the biomass raw materials used need to be produced with limited use of non-renewable fossil fuels. Intercropping strategies are known to maximize growth and productivity by including more than one species in the crop stand, very often with legumes as one of the components. In the present study clover-grass is undersown in a traditional wheat crop. Thereby, it is possible to increase input of symbiotic fixation of atmospheric nitrogen into the cropping systems and reduce the need for fertilizer applications. Furthermore, when using such wheat and clover-grass mixtures as raw material, addition of urea and other fermentation nutrients produced from fossil fuels can be reduced in the whole ethanol manufacturing chain. Using second generation ethanol technology mixtures of relative proportions of wheat straw and clover-grass (15:85, 50:50, and 85:15) were pretreated by wet oxidation. The results showed that supplementing wheat straw with clover-grass had a positive effect on the ethanol yield in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation experiments, and the effect was more pronounced in inhibitory substrates. The highest ethanol yield (80% of theoretical) was obtained in the experiment with high fraction (85%) of clover-grass. In order to improve the sugar recovery of clover-grass, it should be separated into a green juice (containing free sugars, fructan, amino acids, vitamins and soluble minerals) for direct fermentation and a fibre pulp for pretreatment together with wheat straw. Based on the obtained results a decentralized biorefinery concept for production of biofuel is suggested emphasizing sustainability, localness, and recycling principles.


Biomass Intercropping Bioethanol Wetoxidation Biorefinery 



We thank for technical assistance from Tomas Fernqvist, Risø-DTU.


  1. 1.
    Andersen M, Kiel P, Thomsen MH (2006) Use of plant juice as fermentation medium. In: Kamm B, Gruber PR, Kamm M (eds) Biorefineries—industrial processes and products, Wiley-VCH, Germany, pp 295–314Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bai FW, Anderson WA, Moo-Young M (2008) Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv, pp 89–105Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bjerre AB, Olesen AB, Fernqvist T, Plöger A, Schmidt AS (1996) Pretreatment of wheat straw using combined wet oxidation and alkaline hydrolysis resulting in convertible cellulose and hemicellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 49:568–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    EU (2007) Brussels European Council 8–9 March—Presidency conclusions (
  5. 5.
    Eurobserver (2006), Biofuels barometer May, pp 57–66Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galbe M, Zacchi G (2002) A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:618–628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hauggaard-Nielsen H, de Neergaard A, Jensen LS, Høgh-Jensen H, Magid J (1998) A field study of N dynamics and spring barley growth as affected by the quality of incorporated residues from white clover and ryegrass. Plant Soil 203:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Andersen MK, Jørnsgaard B, Jensen ES (2005) Density and relative frequency effects on competitive interactions and resource use in pea–barley intercrops. Field Crop Res 95:256–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirst EL (1957) Some aspects of the chemistry of the fructosans. Proceedings of the Chemical Society, pp 193–204Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horacio GP (1990) Fructans. Methods Plant Biochem 2:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Høgh-Jensen H, Schjoerring JK (1994) Measurement of biological dinitrogen fixation in grassland: comparison of the enriched 15N dilution and the natural 15N abundance methods at different N application rates and defoliation frequencies. Plant Soil 166:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Känkänen H, Eriksson C (2007) Effects of undersown crops on soil mineral N and grain yield of spring barley. Eur J Agron 27:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klinke HB, Olsson L, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK (2003) Potential inhibitors from wet oxidation of wheat straw and their effect on ethanol production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: wet oxidation and fermentation by yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 3–81:738–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Tengborg C, Stenberg K, Zacchi G, Nilvebrant NO (1999) The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb Technol 24:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martín C, Thomsen MH, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Thomsen AB (2007) Wet oxidation pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of clover-ryegrass mixtures. Bioresour Technol. Accepted paperGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McGinnis GD, Wilson WW, Prince SE, Chen CC (1983) Conversion of biomass into chemicals with high-temperature wet oxidation. Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 22:633–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olsson L, Hahn-Hagerdal B (1993) Fermentative performance of bacteria and yeasts in lignocellulose hydrolysates. Process Biochem 28:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reynolds MP, Sayre KD, Vivar HE (1994) Intercropping wheat and barley with N-fixing legume species—a method for improving ground cover, N-use efficiency and productivity in low-input systems. J Agric Sci 123:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmidt AS, Thomsen AB (1998) Optimization of wet oxidation pretreatment of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 64:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simpson R, Bonnet G (1992) Fructan exohydrolase from grasses. New Phytol 123:453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Somoza V (2005) Five years of research on health risks and benefits of Maillard reaction products: an update. Mol Nutr Food Res 49:663–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thomsen AB, Medina C, and Ahring BK (2003) Biotechnology in ethanol production. In: Larsen H, Kossmann J, Petersen LS (eds) 2, pp 40–44Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomsen MH, Thygesen A, Christensen BH, Larsen J, Jørgensen H, Thomsen AB (2006) Preliminary results on optimising hydrothermal pretreatment used in co-production of biofuels. Appl Biochem Biotech, 129–132: 448–460Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thorsted MD, Olesen JE, Weiner J (2006) Width of clover strips and wheat rows influence grain yield in winter wheat/white clover intercropping. Field Crops Res 95:280–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Varga E, Schmidt AS, Reczey K, Thomsen AB (2003) Pretreatment of corn stover using wet oxidation to enhance enzymatic digestibility. Appl Biochem Biotech 104:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mette Hedegaard Thomsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Henrik Haugaard-Nielsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Biosystems DepartmentRisø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy Technical University of Denmark-DTURoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations