Advertisement

Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture

  • Muhammad Saleem
  • Muhammad ArshadEmail author
  • Sarfraz Hussain
  • Ahmad Saeed Bhatti
Review

Abstract

Ethylene is a gaseous plant growth hormone produced endogenously by almost all plants. It is also produced in soil through a variety of biotic and abiotic mechanisms, and plays a key role in inducing multifarious physiological changes in plants at molecular level. Apart from being a plant growth regulator, ethylene has also been established as a stress hormone. Under stress conditions like those generated by salinity, drought, waterlogging, heavy metals and pathogenicity, the endogenous production of ethylene is accelerated substantially which adversely affects the root growth and consequently the growth of the plant as a whole. Certain plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) contain a vital enzyme, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, which regulates ethylene production by metabolizing ACC (an immediate precursor of ethylene biosynthesis in higher plants) into α-ketobutyrate and ammonia. Inoculation with PGPR containing ACC deaminase activity could be helpful in sustaining plant growth and development under stress conditions by reducing stress-induced ethylene production. Lately, efforts have been made to introduce ACC deaminase genes into plants to regulate ethylene level in the plants for optimum growth, particularly under stressed conditions. In this review, the primary focus is on giving account of all aspects of PGPR containing ACC deaminase regarding alleviation of impact of both biotic and abiotic stresses onto plants and of recent trends in terms of introduction of ACC deaminase genes into plant and microbial species.

Keywords

1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase Ethylene Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Stresses 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial support for this study was provided by Higher Education Commission (HEC), Islamabad, Pakistan. We are also thankful to Dr. Maria L.W. Sels for editing this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME (1992) Ethylene in Plant Biology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adam G, Duncan HJ (1999) Effect of diesel fuel on growth of selected plant species. Environ Geochem Health 21:353–357Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arshad M, Shaharoona B, Mahmood T (2007) Inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase partially eliminates the effects of water stress on growth, yield and ripening of Pisum sativum L. Pedosphere (in press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arshad M, Saleem M, Hussain S (2007) Perspectives of bacterial ACC deaminase in phytoremediation. Trends Biotechnol (in press)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (1990) Ethylene accumulation in soil in response to organic amendments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1026–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (1990) Production and stability of ethylene in soil. Biol Fert Soils 10:29–34Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (1991) Effects of soil properties and trace elements on ethylene production in soils. Soil Science 151:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (1991) Microbial production of plant hormones. In: Keister DL, Cregan PB (eds) The rhizosphere and plant growth. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 327–334Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (1998) Plant growth regulating substances in the rhizosphere: microbial production and functions. Advances in Agronomy 62:146–151Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (2002) Ethylene: agricultural sources and applications. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Babalola OO, Osir EO, Sanni AI, Odhaimbo GD, Bulimo WD (2003) Amplification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic (ACC) deaminase from plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in Striga-infested soils. Afr J Biotechnol 2:157–160Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barka EA, NowakJ, Clément C (2006) Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Burkholderia phytofirmans Strain PsJN. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7246–7252Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bashan Y (1994) Symptom expression and ethylene production in leaf blight of cotton caused by Alternaria macrospora and Alternaria alternata alone and combined. Can J Bot 72:1574–1579Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Belimov AA, Hontzeas N, Safronova VI, Demchinskaya SV, Piluzza G, Bullitta S, Glick BR (2005) Cadmium-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with the roots of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern.). Soil Biol Biochem 37:241–250Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Belimov AA, Safronova VI, Mimura T (2002) Response of spring rape (Brassica napus var. oleifera L.) to inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase depends on nutrient status of the plant. Can J Microbiol/Rev Can Microbiol 48:189–199Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belimov AA, Safronova VI, Sergeyeva TA, Egorova TN, Matveyeva VA, Tsyganov VE, Borisov AY, Tikhonovich IA, Kluge C, Preisfeld A, Dietz KJ, Stepanok VV (2001) Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from polluted soils and containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. Can J Microbiol 47:242–252Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Belimov AA, Dodd IC, Safronova VI, Hontzeas N, Davies WJ (2007) Pseudomonas brassicacearum strain Am3 containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase can show both pathogenic and growth-promoting properties in its interaction with tomato. J Exp Bot (doi:10.1093/jxb/erm010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bensalim S, Nowak J, Asiedu S K (1998) A plant growth promoting rhizobacterium and temperature effects on performance of 18 clones of potato. Am J Potato Res 75:145–152Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blaha D, Combaret CP, Mirza MS, LoccozYM (2006) Phylogeny of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase-encoding gene acdS in phytobeneficial and pathogenic Proteobacteria and relation with strain biogeography. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 56:455–470Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ (2001) Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Cur Opin Plant Biol 4:343–350Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blumwald E (2000) Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:431–434Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bradford KJ, Yang SF (1980) Xylem transport of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, an ethylene precursor, in waterlogged tomato plants. Plant Physiol 65:322–326Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bray EA (1997) Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci 2:48–54Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burd GI, Dixon DG, Glick BR (1998) A plant growth-promoting bacterium that decreases nickel toxicity in seedlings. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3663–3668Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burd GI, Dixon DG, Glick BR (2000) Plant growth-promoting bacteria that decrease heavy metal toxicity in plants. Can J Microbiol 46:237–245Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cattelana AJ, Hartela PG, Fuhrmann JJ (1999) Screening for plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria to promote early soybean growth. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1670–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chao Q, Rothenberg M, Solano R, Roman G, Terzaghi W, Ecker JR (1997) Activation of the ethylene gas response pathway in Arabidopsis by the nuclear protein and related proteins. Cell 89:1133–1144Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cheikh N, Jones RJ (1994) Disruption of maize kernel growth and development by heat stress (role of cytokinin/abscisic acid balance). Plant Physiol 106:45–51Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheng Z, Park E, Glick BR (2007) 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase from Pseudomonas putida UW4 facilitates the growth of canola in the presence of salt. Can J Microbiol (in press)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coupland D, Jackson MB (1991) Effects of mecoprop (an auxin analogue) on ethylene evolution and epinasty in two biotypes of stellaria media. Ann Bot 68:167–172Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cuartero J, Fernandez-Munoz R (1999) Tomato and salinity. Sci Hortic 78:83–125Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Prado JL, de Prado RA, Shimabukuro RH (1999) The effect of diclofop on membrane potential, ethylene induction, and herbicide phytotoxicity in resistant and susceptible biotypes of grasses. Pestic Biochem Physiol 63:1–14Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dey R, Pal KK, Bhatt DM, Chauhan SM (2004) Growth promotion and yield enhancement of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 159:371–94Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y (2003) Plant growth-promoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Crit Rev Plant Sci 22:107–149Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Domenech J, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, Ramos B, Gutierrez-Mañero J (2006) Combined application of the biological product LS213 with Bacillus, Pseudomonas or Chryseobacterium for growth promotion and biological control of soil-borne diseases in pepper and tomato. Biocontrol 51:245–258Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dodd IC, Belimov AA, Sobeih WY, Safronova VI, Grierson D, Davies WJ (2005) Will modifying plant ethylene status improve plant productivity in water-limited environments? 4th International Crop Science Congress. http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/poster/1/3/4/510_doddicref.htm (Accessed at June 17, 2007)
  38. 38.
    Donate-Correa J, Leon-Barrios M, Perez-Galdona R (2005) Screening for plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Chamaecytisus proliferus (tagasaste), a forage tree-shrub legume endemic to the Canary Islands. Plant Soil 266:261–272Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Elad Y (1988) Involvement of ethylene in the disease caused by Botrytis cinerea on rose and carnation flowers and the possibility of control. Ann Appl Biol 113:589–598Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Else MA, Hall KC, Arnold GM, Davies WJ, Jackson MB (1995) Export of abscisic acid, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, phosphate, and nitrate from roots to shoots of flooded tomato plants. Plant Physiol 107:377–384Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ernst WHO (1998) Effects of heavy metals in plants at the cellular and organismic level. In: Schüürmann G, Markert B (eds) Ecotoxicology. Wiley, New York, pp 587–620Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fallik E, Sarig S, Okon Y (1994) Morphology and physiology of plant roots associated with Azospirillum. In: Okon Y (ed) Azospirillum/plant associations. CRC Press, London, pp 77–86Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Feng J, Barker AV (1993) Ethylene evolution and ammonium accumulation by tomato plants under water and salinity stresses. J Plant Nutr 15:2471–2490Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ferro AJ, Bestwick RK, Brown LR (1995) Inventors; agritope, assignee. 1995/05/16. Genetic control of ethylene biosynthesis in plants using S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase. US Patent # 05416250; 1995Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Frankenberger WT, Arshad M (1995) Phytohormones in soil: microbial production and function. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ghosh S, Penterman JN, Little RD, Chavez R, Glick BR (2003) Three newly isolated plant growth-promoting bacilli facilitate the seedling growth of canola, Brassica campestris. Plant Physiol Biochem 41:277–281Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Glick BR Bashan Y 1997 Genetic manipulation of plant growth-promoting bacteria to enhance biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens. Biotechnol Adv 15:353–378Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Glick BR (2005) Modulation of plant ethylene levels by the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 251:1–7Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li J (1998) A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190:63–68Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Grichko VP, Filby B, Glick BR (2000) Increased ability of transgenic plants expressing the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase to accumulate Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn. J Biotechnol 81:45–53Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Grichko VP, Glick BR (2001) Amelioration of flooding stress by ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting bacteria. Plant Physiol Biochem 39:11–17Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Grichko VP, Glick BR (2001) Flooding tolerance of transgenic tomato plants expressing the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase controlled by the 35S, rolD or PRB-1b promoter. Plant Physiol Biochem 39:19–25Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Grichko VP, Glick BR, Grishko VI, Pauls KP (2005) Evaluation of tomato plants with constitutive, root-specific, and stress-induced ACC deaminase gene expression. Russ J Plant Physiol 52:359–364Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hewitt K (1997) Regions at risk: a geographical introduction to disasters. Addision Wesley Longman Limited, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Higgins JD, Newbury HJ, Barbara1 DJ, Muthumeenakshi S, Puddephat IJ (2006) The production of marker-free genetically engineered broccoli with sense and antisense ACC synthase 1 and ACC oxidases 1 and 2 to extend shelf-life. Mole Breed 17:7–20Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hong Y, Glick BR, Pasternak JJ (1991) Plant-microbial interaction under gnotobiotic conditions: a scanning electron microscope study. Curr Microbiol 23:111–114Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Honma M (1985) Chemically reactive sulfhydryl groups of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. Agric Biol Chem 49:567–571Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Honma M, Shimomura T (1978) Metabolism of 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Agric Biol Chem 42:1825–1831Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hontzeas N, Hontzeas CE, Glick BR (2006) Reaction mechanisms of the bacterial enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. Biotechnol Adv 24:420–426Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hontzeas N, Zoidakis J, Glick BR, Abu-Omar MM (2004) Expression and characterization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase from the rhizobacterium P. putida UW4: a key enzyme in bacterial plant growth promotion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1703:11–19Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ingram J, Bartels D (1996) The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:377–403Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jackson MB (1997) Hormones from roots as signal for the shoots of stressed plants. Trends Plant Sci 2:22–28Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jacobson CB, Pasternak JJ, Glick BR (1994) Partial purification and characterization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase from the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12–2. Can J Microbiol/Rev Can Microbiol 40:1019–1025Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ji P, Campbell HL, Kloepper JW, Jones JB, Suslow TV, Wilson M (2006) Integrated biological control of bacterial speck and spot of tomato under field conditions using foliar biological control agents and plant growth- promoting rhizobacteria. Biol Control 36:358–367Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Jia YJ, Kakuta Y, Sugawara M, Igarashi T, Oki N, Kisaki M, Shoji T, Kanetuna Y, Horita T, Matsui H, Honma M (1999) Synthesis and degradation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid by Penicillium citrinum. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 63:542–549Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Jackson RW, Selengut J, Dodson R, Brinkac LM et al (2005) Whole-genome sequence analysis of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola 1448A reveals divergence among pathovars in genes involved in virulence and transposition. J Bacteriol 187:6488–6498Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Johnson PR, Ecker JR (1998) The ethylene gas signal transduction pathway: a molecular perspective. Annu Rev Genet 32:227–254Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Karthikeyan S, Zhao Z, Kao C, Zhou Q, Tao Z, Zhang H, Liu H (2004) Structural analysis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase: observation of an aminyl intermediate and identification of Tyr294 as the active-site nucleophile. Angew Chem Int Ed 43:3425–3429Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Karthikeyan S, Zhou Q, Zhao Z, Kao CL, Tao Z, Robinson H, Liu HW, Zhang H (2004) Structural analysis of Pseudomonas 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase complexes: insight into the mechanism of a unique pyridoxal-5′-phosphate dependent cyclopropane ring-opening reaction. Biochemistry 43:13328–13339Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kende H (1993) Ethylene biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44:283–307Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Klee HJ, Hayford MB, Kretzmer KA, Barry GE, Kishore GM (1991) Control of ethylene synthesis by expression of a bacterial enzyme in transgenic tomato plants. Plant Cell 3:1187–1193Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Klee HJ, Kishore GM (1992) Control of fruit ripening and senescence in plants. International Patent No.WO92/12249. European Patent Office, World Intellectuall Property OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kogan FN (1997) Global drought watch from space. Bull Bridge Univ Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kumar A, Taylor MA, Mad Arif SA, Davies HV (1996) Potato plants expressing antisense and sense S-adenosylme-thionine decarboxylase (SAMDC) transgenes show altered levels of polyamines and ethylene: antisense plants display abnormal phenotypes. Plant J9:47–58Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lasserre E, Bouquin T, Hernandez JA, Bull J, Pech JC, Balagua C (1996) Structure and expression of three genes encoding ACC oxidase homologs from melon (Cucumis melo L). Mol Gen Genet 251:81–90Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lee KH, LaRue TA (1992) Exogenous ethylene inhibits nodulation of Pisum sativum L. cv Sparkle. Plant Physiol 100:1759–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lei CH, Lindstrom JT, Woodson WR (1996) Reduction of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in pollen by expression of ACC deaminase in transgenic petunias. Plant Physiol 149(Suppl):111Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Li Q, Saleh-Lakha S, Glick BR (2005) The effect of native and ACC deaminase-containing Azospirillum brasilense Cd1843 on the rooting of carnation cuttings. Can J Microbiol 51:511–514Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lugtenberg BJJ, Dekkers L, Bloemberg GV (2001) Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:461–490Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ma W, Charles TC, Glick BR (2004) Expression of an exogenous 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase gene in Sinorhizobium meliloti increases its ability to nodulate alfalfa. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5891–5897Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ma W, Guinel FC, Glick BR (2003) Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase promotes nodulation of pea plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4396–4402Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ma W, Sebestianova SB, Sebestian J, Burd GI, Guinel FC, Glick BR (2003) Prevalence of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase in Rhizobium spp. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 83:285–291Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Ryu J, Sa T (2006) Regulation of ethylene levels in canola (Brassica campestris) by 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase-containing Methylobacterium fujisawaense. Planta 224:268–78Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Mattoo AK, Suttle JC (1991) The Plant Hormone Ethylene. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:565–572Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria that confer resistance to water stress in tomato and pepper. Plant Sci 166:525–530Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Mayak S, Tivosh T, Glick BR (1999) Effect of wild type and mutant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the rooting of mungbeen cuttings. J Plant Growth Regul 18:49–53Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    McCune JM (1975) Definition of invisible injury in plants. In: Treshow M (ed) Interaction of air pollutants and plant diseases. 122:307–334Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    McGarvey DJ, Yu H, Chrlstoffenen RE (1990) Nucleotide sequence of a ripening related cDNA from avocado fruit. Plant Mol Biol 15:165–167Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Mehlhorn H, Wellburn AR (1987) Stress ethylene formation determines plant sensitivity to ozone. Nature 327:417–418Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Mendelsohn R, Rosenberg NJ (1994) Framework for integrated assessments of global warming impacts. Clim Change 28:15–44Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Minami R., Uchiyama K, Murakami T, Kawai J, Mikami K, Yamada T, Yokoi D, Ito H, Matsui H, Honma M (1998) Properties, sequence, and synthesis in Escherichia coli of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase from Hansenula saturnus. J Biochem (Tokyo) 123:1112–1118Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Moeder W, Barry CS, Tauriainen AA, Betz C, Tuomainen J, Utriainen M, Grierson D, Sandermann H, Langebartels C, Kangasjärvi J (2002) Ethylene synthesis regulated by bi-phasic induction of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase genes is required for hydrogen peroxide accumulation and cell death in ozone-exposed tomato. Plant Physiol 130:1918–1926Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Nadeem SM., Hussain I, Naveed M, Ashgar HN, Zahir ZA, Arshad M (2006) Performance of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase activity for improving growth of maize under salt-stressed conditions. Pak J Agri Sci 43:114–121Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Nadeem SM., Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Arshad M, Shahzad SM (2006) Variation in growth and ion uptake of maize due to inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under salt stress. Soil Environ 25:78–84Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Nayani S, Mayak S, Glick BR (1998) The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on the senescence of flower petals. Ind J Exp Biol 36:836–839Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Neljubow D (1901) Ueber die horizontale nutation der stengel von Pisum sativum und einiger anderer. Pflanzen Beih Bot Zentralbl 10:128–139Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Nie L, Shah S, Burd GI, Dixon DG, Glick BR (2002) Phytoremediation of arsenate contaminated soil by transgenic canola and the plant growth-promoting bacterium Enterobacter cloacae CAL2. Plant Physiol Biochem 40:355–361Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Nukui N, Ezura H, Yuhashi K, Yasuta T, Minamisawa K (2000) Effects of ethylene precursor and inhibitors for ethylene biosynthesis and perception on nodulation in Lotus japonicus and Macroptilium atropurpureum. Plant Cell Physiol 41:893–897Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    O’Donnell PJ, Calvert CM, Atzorn R, Wasternack C, Leyser HMO, Bowles DJ (1996) Ethylene as a signal mediating the wound response of tomato plants. Science 274:1914–17Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Okazaki S, Nukui N, Sugawara M, Minamisawa K (2004) Rhizobial strategies to enhance symbiotic interactions: rhizobitoxine and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. Microbes Environ 19:99–111Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Oldroyd GED, Engstrom EM, Long SR (2001) Ethylene inhibits the Nod factor signal transduction pathway of Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 13:1835–1849Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Olson DC, Oetiker JH, Yang SF (1995) Analysis of LE-ACS3, a 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene expressed during flooding in the roots of tomato plants. J Biol Chem 270:14056–14061Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Pandey P, Kang SC, Maheshwari DK (2005) Isolation of endophytic plant growth promoting Burkholderia sp. MSSP from root nodules of Mimosa pudica. Curr Sci 89:170–180Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Patten CL, Glick BR (2002) The role of bacterial indoleacetic acid in the development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3795–3801Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Penrose DM, Glick BR (2001) Levels of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in exudates and extracts of canola seeds treated with plant growth-promoting bacteria. Can J Microbiol 47:368–372Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Prasad MNV, Strazalka K (2000) Physiology and biochemistry of metal toxicity and tolerance in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 153–160Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Rasche F, Velvis H, Zachow C, Berg G, Van Elsas JD, Sessitsch A (2006) Impact of transgenic potatoes expressing anti-bacterial agents on bacterial endophytes is comparable with the effects of plant genotype, soil type and pathogen infection. J Appl Ecol 43:555–566Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Rasche F, Marco-Noales E, Velvis H, Overbeek LS, López MM, Elsas JD, Sessitsch A (2006) Structural characteristics and plant-beneficial effects of bacteria colonizing the shoots of field grown conventional and genetically modified T4-lysozyme producing potatoes. Plant Soil 298:123–140Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Reed AJ, Magin KM, Anderson JS, Austin GD, Rangwala T, Linde DC, Love JN, Rogers SG, Fuchs RL (1995) Delayed ripening tomato plants expressing the enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase. 1. Molecular characterization, enzyme expression, and fruit ripening traits. J Agric Food Chem 43:1954–1962Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Reed MLE, Warner BG, Glick BR (2005) Plant growth-promoting bacteria facilitate the growth of the common reed Phragmites australis in the presence of copper or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Curr Microbiol 51:425–429Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Reed MLE, Glick BR (2005) Growth of canola (Brassica napus) in the presence of plant growth-promoting bacteria and either copper or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Can J Microbiol 51:1061–1069Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Reid MS, Wu MJ (1992) Ethylene and flower senescence. Plant Growth Regul 11:37–43Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Robertson GP, Paul EA, Harwood RR (2000) Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:1922–1924Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Robison MM, Griffith M, Pauls KP, Glick BR (2001) Dual role of ethylene in susceptibility of tomato to Verticillium wilt. J Phytopathol 2:385–388Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Robison MM, Shah S, Tamot B, Pauls KP, Mott BA, Glick BR (2001) Reduced symptoms of Verticillium wilt in transgenic tomato expressing a bacterial ACC deaminase. Mol Plant Pathol 2:135–145Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Rodecap KD, Tingey DT, Tibbs JH (1981) Cadmium-induced ethylene production in bean plants. Z Pflanzenphysiol 105:65–74Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Ross GS, Knighton ML, Yee ML (1992) An ethylene-related cDNA from ripening apples. Plant Mol Biol 19:231–238Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Safronova VI, Stepanok VV, Engqvist GL, Alekseyev YV, Belimov AA (2006) Root-associated bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase improve growth and nutrient uptake by pea genotypes cultivated in cadmium supplemented soil. Biol Fert Soils 42:267–272Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Saleh SS, Glick BR (2001) Involvement of gacS and rpoS in enhancement of the plant growth-promoting capabilities of Enterobacter cloacae CAL2 and Pseudomonas putida UW4. Can J Microbiol/Rev Can Microbiol 47:698–705Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Saravanakumar D, Samiyappan R (2007) ACC deaminase from Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated saline resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogea) plants. J Appl Microbiol 102:1283–1292Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Sergeeva E, Shah S, Glick BR (2006) Growth of transgenic canola (Brassica napus cv. Westar) expressing a bacterial 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase gene on high concentrations of salt. World J Microbiol Biotech 22:277–282Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Sessitsch A, Coenye T, Sturz AV, Vandamme P, Barka E, Wang-Pruski G, Faure D, Reiter B, Glick BR, Nowak J (2005) Burkholderia phytofirmins sp. Nov., a novel plant-associated bacterium with plant beneficial properties. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1187–1192Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Shaharoona B, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2006) Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase on maize (Zea mays L.) growth under axenic conditions and on nodulation in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Lett Appl Microbiol 42:155–159Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Shaharoona B, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2006) Performance of Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the presence of nitrogenous fertilizer. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2971–2975Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Shan XC, Goodwin PH (2006) Silencing an ACC oxidase gene affects the susceptible host response of Nicotiana benthamiana to infection by Colletotrichum orbiculare. Plant Cell Rep 25:241–247Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Sheehy RE, Honma M, Yamada M, Sasaki T, Martineau B, Hiatt WR (1991) Isolation, sequence, and expression in Escherichia coli of the Pseudomonas sp. strain ACP gene encoding 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. J Bacteriol 173:5260–5265Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (1999) Molecular responses to drought stress. In: Shinozaki K, Shinozaki YK (ed) Molecular responses to cold, drought, heat and salt stress in higher plants. RG Landes, Austin, pp 11–28Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Sikorski J, Jahr H, Wackernagel W (2001) The structure of a local population of phytopathogenic Pseudomonas brassicacearum from agricultural soil indicates development under purifying selection pressure. Environ Microbiol 3:176–186Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Sisler EC, Serek M (1997) Inhibitors of ethylene responses in plants at the receptor level: recent developments. Physiol Plant 100:577–582Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Stearns JC, Shah S, Greenberg BM, Dixon DG, Glick BR (2005) Tolerance of transgenic canola expressing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase to growth inhibition by nickel. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:701–708Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Stiens M, Schneiker S, Keller M, Kuhn S, Pühler A, Schlüter A (2006) Sequence analysis of the 144-kilobase accessory plasmid psmesm11a, isolated from a dominant Sinorhizobium meliloti strain identified during a long-term field release experiment. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3662–3672Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Strzelczyk E, Kampert M, Pachlewski R (1994) The influence of pH and temperature on ethylene production by mycorrhizal fungi of pine. Mycorrhiza 4:193–196Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Tabor CW, Tabor H (1985) Polyamines in microorganisms. Microbiol Rev 49:81–99Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Tamot` BK, Pauls KP, Glick BR (2003) Regulation of expression of the prb-1b/ACC deaminase gene by UV-B in transgenic tomatoes. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 12:25–29Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Tilak KVBR, Ranganayaki N, Manoharachari C (2006) Synergistic effects of plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria and Rhizobium on nodulation and nitrogen fixation by pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Eur J Soil Sci 57:67–71Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Tuomainen J, Betz C, Kangasjarvi J, Ernst D, Yin ZH, Langebartels C, Sandermann H Jr (1997) Ozone induction of ethylene emission in tomato plants: Regulation by differential transcript accumulation for the biosynthetic enzymes. Plant J 12:1151–1162Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Uchiumi T, Oowada T, Itakura M, Mitsui H, Nukui N, Dawadi P, Kaneko T, Tabata S, Yokoyama T, Tejima T, Saeki K, Oomori H, Hayashi M, Maekawa T, Sriprang R, Murooka Y, Tajima S, Simomura K, Nomura M, Suzuki A, Shimoda S, Sioya K, Abe M, Minamisawa K (2004) Expression islands clustered on symbiosis island of Mesorhizobium loti genome. J Bacteriol 186:2439–2448Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Vahala J, Ruonala R, Keinanen M, Tuominen H, Kangasjarvi J (2003) Ethylene insensitivity modulates ozone-induced cell death in birch. Plant Physiol 132:185–195Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Wang C, Ramette A, Punjasamarnwong P, Zala M, Natsch A, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Defago G (2001) Cosmopolitan distribution of phlD-containing dicotyledonous crop associated biological control Pseudomonads of worldwide origin. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 37:105–116Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Wang CKE, Glick BR, Defago G (2000) Effect of transferring 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase genes into pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 and its gacA derivative CHA96 on their growth-promoting and disease-suppressive capacities. Can J Microbiol 46:898–907Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Wang CY (1987) Changes of polyamines and ethylene in cucumber seedlings in response to chilling stress. Physiol Plantarum 69:253–257Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Wang KL, Li H, Ecker JR (2002) Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell 14:131–151Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Whipp JM (1990) Carbon utilization. In: Lynch JM (ed) The rhizosphere. Wiley, Chichester, pp 59–97Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Wilhite DA (2000) Drought as a natural hazard. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment. Routledge, London, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Woltering EJ, van Doorn WG (1988) Role of ethylene in senescence of petals—morphological and taxonomical relationships. J Expl Bot 39:1605–1616Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Yuquan X, Rong S, Zhixing L (1999) Quickly screening a strain of Pseudomonas B8 with both ACC deaminase activity and antagonism against Fusarium oxysporum. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/qikan/periodical.articles/shjtdxxb/shjt99/shjt9902/990223.htm (Accessed at June 11, 2007)
  149. 149.
    Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Frankenberger WT (2004) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: applications and perspectives in agriculture. Adv Agron 81:97–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Saleem
    • 1
  • Muhammad Arshad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sarfraz Hussain
    • 1
  • Ahmad Saeed Bhatti
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Soil and Environmental SciencesUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations