Advertisement

Novel optimal temperature profile for acidification process of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus in yoghurt fermentation using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm

  • E. B. Gueguim-KanaEmail author
  • J. K. Oloke
  • A. Lateef
  • M. G. Zebaze-Kana
Original Paper

Abstract

The acidification behavior of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus for yoghurt production was investigated along temperature profiles within the optimal window of 38–44 °C. For the optimal acidification temperature profile search, an optimization engine module built on a modular artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA) was used. Fourteen batches of yoghurt fermentations were evaluated using different temperature profiles in order to train and validate the ANN sub-module. The ANN captured the nonlinear relationship between temperature profiles and acidification patterns on training data after 150 epochs. This served as an evaluation function for the GA. The acidification slope of the temperature profile was the performance index. The GA sub-module iteratively evolved better temperature profiles across generations using GA operations. The stopping criterion was met after 11 generations. The optimal profile showed an acidification slope of 0.06117 compared to an initial value of 0.0127 and at a set point sequence of 43, 38, 44, 43, and 39 °C. Laboratory evaluation of three replicates of the GA suggested optimum profile of 43, 38, 44, 43, and 39 °C gave an average slope of 0.04132. The optimization engine used (to be published elsewhere) could effectively search for optimal profiles of different physico-chemical parameters of fermentation processes.

Keywords

Process optimization Temperature profile Yoghurt acidification profile Artificial neural network Genetic algorithm 

References

  1. 1.
    Baishan F, Hongwen C, Xiaolan X, Ning W, Zongding H (2003) Using Genetic algorithms coupling neural networks in a study of xylitol production. Process Biochem 38:979–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen L, Nguang SK, Chen DX, Li XM (2004) Modelling and optimization of fed-batch fermentation processes using dynamic neural networks and Genetic algorithms. Biochem Eng J 22:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cimander C, Carlsson M, Madenius C (2002) Sensor fusion for online monitoring of yoghurt fermentation. J Biotechnol 99:237–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diaz C, Dieu P, Feuillerart C, Lelong P, Salome M (1996) Simultaneous adaptive predictive control of the partial pressure of dissolved oxygen and dissolved carbon dioxide in a laboratory scale bioreactor. J Biotechnol 52:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dutta RJ, Dutta PK, Banerjee R (2004) Optimization of culture parameters for extracellular protease production from a newly isolated Pseudomonas sp. using response surface and artificial neural networks models. Process Biochem 39:2193–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gueguim-Kana EB, Oloke JK, Zebaze-Kana MG, Lateef A (2003) Computer software for real time control and monitoring of fermentation processes. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci 5(4):415–419Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horiuchi J, Shimada T, Funahashi H, Tada K, Kobayashi M, Kanno T (2004) Artificial neural network model with a culture database for prediction of acidification step in cheese production. J Food Eng 63:459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katare S, Venkatasubramanian V (2001) An agent based learning framework for modelling microbial growth. Eng Appl Artif Intell 14:715–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kristo E, Biliaderis GC, Tzanetakis N (2003) Modelling of rheological, microbiological and acidification properties of a fermented milk product containing a probiotic strain of Lactobacillus paracasei. Int Dairy J 13:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laligant A, Famelart M, Brule G, Piot M, Paquet D (2002) Fermentation by lactic acid bacteria at two temperatures of preheated reconstituted milk. 1-A behavior of proteins and minerals. Lait 83:181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rani KY, Rao VR (1999) Control of fermenters—a review. Bioprocess Eng 21:77–88Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schugerl K (2001) Progress in monitoring, modelling and control of bioprocesses during the last 20 years. J Biotechnol 85:149–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silva RG, Cruz AJG, Hokka CO, Giordano RL, Giordano RC (2000) A hybrid feed forward neural network for the cephalosporin C production process. Braz J Chem Eng 17:4–7Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tamine AY, Deeth HC (1980) Yogurt: technology and biochemistry. J Food Prot 43:939Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zuo K, Wu WT (2000) Semi-real optimization and control of fed-batch fermentation system. Comput Chem Eng 24:1105–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Industrial Microbiology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. B. Gueguim-Kana
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. K. Oloke
    • 1
  • A. Lateef
    • 1
  • M. G. Zebaze-Kana
    • 2
  1. 1.Biotechnology CentreLadoke Akintola University of TechnologyOgbomosoNigeria
  2. 2.Italian National Research Council (CNR)Institute of Microelectronics and Microsystems (IMM)BolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations